ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021038
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 September 1997, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for altering an official document, being disrespect to a noncommissioned officer, failing to report to her appointed place of duty at the prescribed time, and making a false statement, with an under other than...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021088
On 3 February 2011, the separation authority, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was separated on 1 March 2011, under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14-12b (Pattern of Misconduct), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge, a SPD code of JKA and a RE code of 3. Records show the proper discharge and separation authority procedures were followed in this case.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021126
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized service separation. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Entry Level Performance and Conduct," and the separation code is "JGA." Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated 9 October 2012; DD Form 214 for service under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021236
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 041025 Discharge Received: Date: 041117 Chapter: 14-12c(2) AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: HHC, 19th Support Center, APO AE 09096 Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 040929, wrongfully used marijuana (040711-040811); reduction to E-1; forfeiture of $597 pay x 2 months, extra duty for 30 days and restriction for 30 days, (FG). Yes No Counsel:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021246
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 7 May 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200 by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs for testing positive (111208) for amphetamines. The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions....
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021251
The evidence of the applicants service record indicates that on 17 November 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, for misconduct (serious offense). EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided with his online application, DD Form 214 for service under current review; a defense counsel memorandum, dated 5 November 2010; 2 support statements, dated 5 and 10 November...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021283
Applicant Name: ????? On 2 June 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst acknowledges the applicant's in service accomplishments to include his combat service as stated in his application.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021287
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 May 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120021287 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the characterization of service was too harsh based on the overall length and quality of the applicant's service, to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021388
The evidence shows that on 23 April 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, for Misconduct-Abuse of Illegal Drugs for wrongfully used Amphetamines and Methamphetamines (between 120101-120104). On 4 May 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021449
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 April 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120021449 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the enclosed Discussion and Recommendation that follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The applicant requests an upgrade of her...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021465
On 3 February 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, specifically for the commission of the following serious offenses: a. Based on the above misconduct, the commander recommended an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 12 March 1999, the separation authority approved the applicants request to waive his administrative separation board and directed the issuance of an under other than...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021504
The applicant requests to upgrade his characterization of service from a Bad Conduct discharge to fully honorable. The record shows that on 20 May 2002, the applicant was found guilty by a special court-martial empowered to adjudge a bad conduct discharge for the following offenses: a. through neglect, missed movement (011116) b. through design, missed movement (011117) He was sentenced to be discharged with a Bad Conduct Discharge, confinement for 5 months, reduction to E-1, and forfeiture...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021512
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he was told, on the day of his discharge that it was supposed to be honorable and that had he waited a week or so it would have been changed. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available military records, and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021515
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 June 2006 for a period of 3 years and reenlisted 27 March 2009 for 5 years. On 9 November 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 15 July 2007, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021516
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 March 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for testing positive for marijuana (071121); and being a deserter until (071120), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021517
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the characterization of service was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. On 30 June 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021518
Discharge Received: General, under honorable conditions c. Date of Discharge: 3 May 2012 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Misconduct (Serious Offense) / AR 635-200 Paragraph 14-12c / JKQ / RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: B Co, 1st Bn, 12th Cavalry Regiment, 3rd BCT, 1st Cavalry Division, Fort Hood, TX f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 14 August 2008 / 4 years, 9 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 3 years, 8 months, 20 days h. Total Service: 5 years, 11 months, 2 days i. The DD Form 214 also...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021519
EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided DD Form 293, dated 15 November 2012; DD Form 214 for service under current review; VA summary medical message, dated 13 November 2012. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. However, the fact the Veterans Administration has granted the applicant service connection for medical conditions the applicant suffered while on active duty does not...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021524
EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided DD Form 293, dated 11 November 2012; DD Form 214 for service under current review. The applicants statements alone do not overcome the presumption of government regularity in this case and the application contains no documentation or further evidence in support of this request for an upgrade of the discharge. Therefore, based on the available evidence and the presumption of government regularity, it appears the reason for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021525
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 10 July 2012 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Misconduct (Drug Abuse), AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), JKK, RE-4 e. Unit of Assignment: 977th Military Police Company, 97th Military Police Battalion, United States Army Garrison, Fort Riley, KS f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 31 March 2008, 5 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 4 year, 3 months, 10 days h. Total Service: 4 year, 3 months, 10 days i. On 13 June...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021548
Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 9 October 2003 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial/AR-635-200/ Chapter 10/KFS/RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: 626th Forward Support Battalion, Fort Campbell, KY f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 14 November 2000, 4 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 2 years, 10 months, 26 days h. Total Service: 2 years, 10 months, 26 days i. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021570
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 16 April 1996 for 6 years. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. Therefore, based on the available evidence and the presumption of government regularity, it appears that based on the discharge order the characterization of service was both proper and equitable, thus recommend the Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021582
The applicant states, in effect, that he is respectfully requesting his military record be corrected to remove his separation under AR 635-200, Chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge and a separation code of KFS and Reentry Code 4. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 April 1999 for a period of 4 years. A review of the service record does not reveal any...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021593
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 3 June 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120021593 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board found no cause for clemency and voted to deny relief. Special Court-Martial Order 4, dated 4 February 2008 which directed the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021623
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of Misconduct, (Drug Abuse) with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), Misconduct, Drug Abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The burden of proof remains with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021628
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable. On 8 October 2002, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge and did not submit a statement on his behalf. On 12...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021643
The applicant requests an upgrade of his general, under honorable conditions discharge to honorable. On 18 November 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct (drug abuse), specifically for testing positive for cocaine (between 100528-100601). On 7 February 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021644
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 6 November 2012 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Misconduct (Serious Offense), AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, JKQ, RE-3 e. Unit of Assignment: D Company, 526th Brigade Support Battalion (Rear)(Provisional), 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), Fort Campbell, KY f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 5 May 2010, 3 years and 23 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 2 years, 6 months, 2 days h. Total Service: 2 years, 6...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021647
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 15 November 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021648
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 January 1996 for a period of 4 years. He was discharged as a PVT/E-1. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a DD Form 293 dated 13 November 2012, DD Form 214 for the period of service under review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021652
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 10 April 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120021652 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The applicant requests to upgrade his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021653
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 10 April 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120021653 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and notwithstanding the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the characterization of service is now inequitable based on the applicants length and quality of his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021765
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: NIF Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 061226 Chapter: 13 AR: 135-178 Reason: Unsatisfactory Participation RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: HHC, 7-6th AV Bn, Conroe TX Time Lost: NIF Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021767
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 April 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120021767 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Presiding Officer I certify that herein is...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021866
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct (drug abuse), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct-drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicable Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021899
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, the discharge and reenlistment codes were generalized and not specific. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 April 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for his inability to adjust to a structured military environment as...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021929
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 15 July 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120021929 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The reasons for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021997
The applicants record contains a pertinent piece of the separation packet which shows that on 20 April 2012, the separation authority approved and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization. The DD Form 214 shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022053
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 2 February 2012 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Misconduct (Drug Abuse), AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), JKK, RE-4 e. Unit of Assignment: C Troop, 1st Squadron, 4th Cavalry Regiment, 4th Infantry Brigade Combat Team, Fort Riley, KS f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 31 March 2009, 04 years and 16 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 02 year, 10 months, 02 days h. Total Service: 02 year, 10 months, 02 days i. On 4...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022072
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD: There are no counseling statements or UCMJ actions in the record. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided DD Form 293, dated 20 November 2012; DD Form 214 for service under current review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022082
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 17 April 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120022082 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022085
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 13 May 2010 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Pattern of Misconduct, AR 635-200, 14-12b, JKA RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: 4th ARB, TRP AIR CA P1, Schofield, Barracks, HI f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 15 May 2007, 3 years, 19 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 2 years, 11 months, 29 days h. Total Service: 2 years, 11 months, 29 days i. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a DD Form 293, a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022092
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable. The record shows that on 19 April 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, for misconduct (serious offense), specifically for wrongfully using ecstasy, a controlled substance. The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022095
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 July 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for willfully disobeying a commissioned officer, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 26 July 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022097
The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The applicant was discharged under the provisions of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022119
The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. However, the service record contains no evidence of a diagnosis of depression and the applicant did not submit any evidence to support the contention that the discharge was the result of any...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022122
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, for a pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. There is no record of any UCMJ action, although the applicant was discharged as a PVT/E-1. The DD Form 214 also indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct, with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022125
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 27 September 2010 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Pattern of Misconduct , AR 635-200, 14-12b, JKA, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: HHB, 1-319th FA Regt, Fort Bragg, NC f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 6 October 2009, 4 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 0 year, 11 months, 14 days/ to account for period of AWOL h. Total Service: 3 years, 10 months, 4 days i. The evidence contained in the applicants service record...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022130
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 26 April 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120022130 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the applicants length and quality of his service to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022133
The DD Form 214 indicates that on 28 September 2012, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form...