Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019432
Original file (AR20110019432.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/09/19	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, it has been three years since her discharge and she is in the process of getting her life back together.  She is currently extending her career in aviation by taking a class.  She is not qualified to receive tuition assistance from the Veterans Administration.  This is a one year course and she needs help.  She has corrected all of her wrongs since her time in service.  She believes she deserves another chance.  She  performed her duties as a 94L and a Soldier in Iraq to the best of her abilities.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 080102
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 980208   Chapter: 14-12b       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Serious Offense)	   RE:     SPD: JKQ   Unit/Location: C 123d Aviation Regiment, Fort Wainwright, AK 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 070205, AWOL, reduction to E-3, forfeiture of $380.00 x 1 (suspended),  (CG)

070727, suspension of punishment of $380.00 was vacated for a new failed to go to her appointed place offense, (070515)

070625, failed to go to her appointed place of duty x 3 (070515, 061016, and 061020); disrespectful in language towards a noncommissioned officer x 2 (061016 and 061016); and making a false official statement (061127), reduction to E-1 (suspended), forfeiture of $650.00 x 2 (suspended), and extra duty for 45 days, suspended. (FG)

071119, wrongfully used marijuana (070830-070928), reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $650.00 x 2 (suspended) restriction and extra duty for 30 days, suspended (FG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  19
Current ENL Date: 040806    Current ENL Term: 06 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	03 Yrs, 06 Mos, 04 Days ?????
Total Service:  		03 Yrs, 06 Mos, 04 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 94L10 Aviation Communication Equipment Repairer   GT: 99   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: SWA   Combat: Iraq (050417-051030)
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: Taking A & P Mechanic's Class.  

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 28 December 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of Commission of Serious Offense—for  wrongfully using marijuana (070830-070928) Failure to Report x 15 (060213, 060927, 061115, 061120, 070529 (2), 070531, 070626, 070706, 070710, 070730, 070808, 070815, 070828, and 071108); Company Grade Article 15 (070208); Field Grade Article 15 x 2 (070710 and 071119), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  She was advised of his rights.  
       
       On 2 January 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in her own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       On 23 January 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
             Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. 

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of her service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The applicant contends she performed her duties as a 94L and a Soldier in Iraq to the best of her abilities.  The analyst acknowledges the applicant’s in-service accomplishments and considered the quality of her service during the initial portion of the enlistment under review.  However, this service was determined not to be sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade to the characterization of discharge as shown by the repeated incidents of misconduct or by the multiple negative counseling statements, and the documented actions under Article 15 of the Uniformed Code of Military Justice.
       
             Furthermore, the applicant contends she would like to extend her career in aviation by taking an A & P Mechanics Class, but she needs to be able to receive tuition assistance from the Veterans Administration.  However, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 23 March 2012         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 and DD Form 214

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
?????



Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110019432
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 3 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013725

    Original file (AR20080013725.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015282

    Original file (AR20080015282.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016824

    Original file (AR20070016824.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 20 August 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—pattern of misconduct, in that you failed to report to formations, failed to obey orders and regulations, leaving your place of duty, insubordinate conduct towards a noncommissioned officer, AWOL from (070710-070715), breaking restriction, and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010589

    Original file (AR20080010589.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000277

    Original file (AR20080000277.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023699

    Original file (AR20100023699.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090002156

    Original file (AR20090002156.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 23 August 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of marijuana (070509-070531), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110006114

    Original file (AR20110006114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority vacated the suspended separation action, waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", the separation code is "JKK", and the reentry code is "RE 4". Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013721

    Original file (AR20080013721.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 15 October 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—pattern of misconduct for communicating two different threats between (060628 and 060725), failure to go to his appointed place of duty X 2 (061214 and 070127), making a false official statement (061214), disobeying a noncommissioned officer X 3 (070113, 070129, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110023984

    Original file (AR20110023984.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 30 January 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated (111130).