Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2011/09/12 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he has been diagnosed with having Bi-Polar and believes that if that had been diagnosed while he was in the service and treated with medicine, he would still be in the Army. Since getting out and being on medication he has been enjoying a different type of life and has stayed out of trouble. He is also assisting his parents and his father is a 100% disabled veteran from the Viet Nam era and needs extra help in getting around.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 050807
Discharge Received: Date: 050909 Chapter: 14-12c (2) AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse) RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: Company E, 801st Brigade Support Battalion, 506th Infantry Regiment, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), Fort Campbell, KY
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 050617, wrongfully used cocaine between (050304-050308), reduction to Private (E-1), forfeiture of $617.00 pay per month for two months, extra duty and restriction for 45 days, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (050817), (FG).
041117, failed to go to his appointed place of duty x 2 (041101), (041027); reduction to private (E-1), forfeiture of $312.00 pay for one month, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (050317), (CG)
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 21
Current ENL Date: 040128 Current ENL Term: 4 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 7 Mos, 12 Days ?????
Total Service: 1 Yrs, 7 Mos, 12 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-3 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 92G10 Food Service Spec GT: 122 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 12 August 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he was arrested for driving under the influence by the Oak Grove Police Department (050719), and received a Field Grade Article 15 for wrongfully using cocaine (050617), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
He was advised of his rights. On 17 August 2005, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 24 August 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
The record contains a CID Report of Investigation in reference to the applicant's offense of wrongfully possessing marijuana dated 8 April 2005.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he has been diagnosed with having Bi-Polar and believes that if he had been diagnosed while he was in the service and treated with medicine, he would still be in the Army. There is no evidence of record and the applicant has submitted no probative medical evidence that he had a medical problem which rendered him disqualified for further military service and that he was not able to perform his duties, with either medical limitation or medication. The applicant was administratively separated from the Army due to having committed serious acts of misconduct.
Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 9 March 2012 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 31 August 2011.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
X. Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change
XI. Certification Signature
Approval Authority:
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
?????
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20110018776
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007611
The unit commander recommended approval of the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 3 December 2001, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the applicant produced any evidence to support the contention that a bi-polar disorder was the underlying cause of his misconduct.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013474
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 06 Mos, 05 Days ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 4 August 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016533
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 22 November 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-for wrongfully using marijuana and AWOL between 5 October 2004 and 7 October 2004, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 18 January 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025694
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge. The applicant's DD...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015007
The chain of command recommended approval of the resignation for the good of the service with issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 13 October 2005, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board and directed that the Applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014060
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 September 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconductabuse of illegal drugs, for wrongfully importing and using cocaine, wrongful using marijuana, and for failing to report to his designated place of duty, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Action...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028028
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 23 August 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for on 11 February 2007, the applicant was found inhaling from a can of Dust Off and received a Field Grade Article 15. On 28 August 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004128
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 6 April 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of patter of misconduct for failing to report to formations on multiple occasions, being counseled without change in his lateness, and being charged with wrongfully possessing marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016132
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 19 April 2007 , the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004017
Saying he would have me discharged within a week if I tried to request a board! Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...