ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110002781
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 October 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense and for having been convicted by a civil court. The unit commander recommended separation with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The board recommended that the applicant be discharged with issuance...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110002814
Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110002846
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110002963
Applicant Name: ????? Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 24 January 2011. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003026
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 060131 Discharge Received: Date: 060222 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Troop E, 5th Battalion, 15th Cavalry, Fort Knox, KY Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (051114-060122) for 70 days. Additionally, the analyst noted the applicant's issue requesting a change to the narrative reason for separation; however, the narrative reason for separation is governed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003074
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 23 July 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12(b), AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he went AWOL from (090510-090511), wrongfully possessed a rat in his barracks room which violated a lawful order issued by a CPT (090511), and failed to report to his appointed place of duty, with a general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003166
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003214
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003375
On 3 June 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The separation approving authority's recommendation directing the applicant's separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts are not part of the available record and the analyst presumed government regularity in the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003463
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149 dated 12 February 2011 in lieu of a DD Form 293. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003547
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 March 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he received a Field Grade Article 15 on (100223), for being Absent Without Leave from 091106-091109), on the following dates he failed to at his appointed place of duty x 7 (100202), (100106), (091117), (091019), (091030),...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003550
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized separation of service. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Entry Level Performance and Conduct)", the separation code is "JGA", and the reentry code is "RE 3".
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003552
Applicant Name: ????? Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 16 February 2011. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003609
Applicant Name: ????? The analyst noted the applicant's issue requesting that his narrative reason for separation be changed. However, in review of the applicants entire service record, the analyst found that these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003658
Applicant Name: ????? Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 14 February 2011. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: SPC/E-4 Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003663
On 19 December 2000, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 20 December 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003746
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 19 February 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003751
Applicant Name: ????? On 8 June 2004, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Post-9/11...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003758
On 29 December 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of her service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003864
On 15 April 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003868
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 August 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he violated a lawful general regulation by drinking underage on several occasions, committing assault, violating a unit policy regarding curfew, and being drunk and disorderly, with a general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003882
Applicant Name: ????? By the unsatisfactory performance, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable characterization of service. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003911
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that the incident which resulted in him receiving a general discharge was disappointing and he apologizes for his immature actions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct-serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions discharge. The DD Form 214...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003949
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander and intermediate commander's recommended approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue she submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003955
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 31 August 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct; in that he cannot or will not meet the minimum standards for successful completion of training due to a lack of aptitude, ability, motivation, or self discipline, with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004004
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c (2) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004065
Applicant Name: ????? On 26 October 2004, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004072
Applicant Name: ????? On 30 November 2009, the intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004074
On 22 September 1998, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004080
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 980603 Discharge Received: Date: 980710 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: HQ & HQ Company, 1st Battalion, 67th Armor, Fort Hood, TX Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (980209-980325) for 45 days. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004172
Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004173
On 19 November 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The evidence of record shows that the applicant consulted with legal counsel and and was entitled to consideration of his case by an administrative separation board because he had over 6 years of total active and reserve military service at the time of initiation of separation action. Board Action...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004177
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 090818 Discharge Received: Date: 091001 Chapter: 14-12b AR: 635-200 Reason: Pattern of Misconduct RE: SPD: JKA Unit/Location: 41st Trans Co, 18th CSSB, Vilseck, GE Time Lost: AWOL x 1 for 6 days (090109-090114), surrendered. On 8 September 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004300
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander and intermediate commander's recommended approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004309
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, serious offense with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004376
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 October 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that she wrongfully used an illegal drug, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: Online application dated 3 March 2011 and a copy of her Bachelor...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004397
Applicant Name: ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available records for the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004447
Applicant Name: ????? Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 24 February 2011. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004712
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 24 January 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he has consistently behaved in a manner that was not conducive to the standards of good order and discipline maintained by the United States Army; received numerous counseling statements for misconduct varying from...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004713
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 November 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct; in that he has been counseled numerous times for failing to report, disobeying a lawful order, damaging government property, and receiving two Article 15's, one Field Grade and one Company Grade. On 21 November 2010, the separation authority waived...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004766
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 091002 Discharge Received: Date: 091109 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Company E, 369th Signal Battalion, Fort Gordon, GA Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (090515-090818) for 96 days. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004795
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The analyst determined no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and the applicant's service did not warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110005001
Applicant Name: ?? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110005024
Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110005141
On 4 August 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 5 August 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110005158
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 February 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs; in that he abused illegal drugs and received multiple charges for drinking while under the legal age of 21, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 5 April 2010, the separation authority waived...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110005168
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he would like to be able to use his VA Benefits and that he was a good soldier.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110005177
Applicant Name: ????? On 24 January 2007, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110005311
Applicant Name: ????? On 9 June 2010, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110005352
Facts and Circumstances: On 13 May 2005, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was disenrolled as a cadet from the ROTC program. Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-178 govern procedures for the administrative separation of enlisted personnel of the Army National Guard and Army Reserve. The NGB Form 22 shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, paragraph 8-26b(1), NGR 600-200, by reason of...