Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110000866
Original file (AR20110000866.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/01/11	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he was discharged over mental issues and since his discharge, he has been unable to hold down a job.  He has been in prison for two years and in jail for 11 months.  He feels that going to school is his only hope for becoming a productive member of society again, and with his current discharge, he is unable to receive his GI Bill.  

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 060905   Chapter: 5-17       AR: 635-200
Reason: Condition, Not a Disability	   RE:     SPD: JFV   Unit/Location: 13th Maintenance Company, 3rd Battalion, 2nd Air Defense Artillery, 31st Air Defense Artillery Brigade, Fort Bliss, TX. 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  24
Current ENL Date: 050823    Current ENL Term: 3 Years  27 weeks
Current ENL Service: 	1 Yrs, 0 Mos, 13 Days ?????
Total Service:  		1 Yrs, 0 Mos, 13 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 63M10 BFV SYS MNT   GT: 106   EDU: GEC Certif   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The specific facts and circumstances leading to the applicant's discharge from the Army are not contained in the available records.  However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214, (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature.  
       
       The DD Form 214 indicates he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, for a physical condition, not a disability, with a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service.  Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JFV (i.e., physical condition, not a disability), with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3.  On 30 August 2006, DA, HQ, US Army Air Defense Artillery Center, Fort Bliss, TX, issued Orders 242-0017, discharging the applicant from the Regular Army with an effective date of separation: 5 September 2006.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty.  The regulation requires that the condition interferes with the Soldiers’ ability to perform duty, and requires that the diagnosis be so severe that the Soldier’s ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired.  Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status.  A general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally inappropriate for individuals separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-17 unless properly notified of the specific factors in the service that warrant such characterization

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant’s discharge.  
       
       The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to the applicant's discharge from the Army.  However, the applicant’s record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process.   
       
       The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, AR 635-200, paragraph 5-17 by reason of a physical condition, not a disability, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.   
       
       The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  However, the analyst is unable to determine whether these contentions have merit because the facts and circumstances leading to the discharge are unknown.  The burden of proof remains with the applicant to provide the appropriate documents such as the discharge packet or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration.  If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will still be his responsibility to meet the burden of proof since the discharge packet is not available in the official record. 
       
       Additionally, Army Regulation 635-200 provides in part that a fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue wherein he states that with his current discharge, he is unable to receive his GI Bill.  However, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.
       
       Therefore, based on what is available in the applicant’s record, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
       
       
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 24 August 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 3 January 2011.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change


















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110000866
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006801

    Original file (AR20060006801.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 00 Mos, 01Days ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100011385

    Original file (AR20100011385.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028745

    Original file (AR20100028745.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 100709 Chapter: 5-17 AR: 635-200 Reason: Condition, Not a Disability RE: SPD: JFV Unit/Location: Company H, 232nd Trainee MC, Fort Sam Houston, TX Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. A Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070004894

    Original file (AR20070004894.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 05Mos, 17Days ????? His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5-17, by reason of physical condition, not a disability, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge and a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "3." Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 12 October 2007 Lieutenant...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014601

    Original file (AR20080014601.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant II. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, AR 635-200, paragraph 5-17 by reason of a physical condition, not a disability with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070004894aC071121

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5-17, by reason of physical condition, not a disability, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge and a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "3." Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony, and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090020270

    Original file (AR20090020270.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that his character of service should read Honorable. Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110010499

    Original file (AR20110010499.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: On 25 June 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition for being diagnosed by competent medical authority as having an Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Disturbance of Emotions and Conduct as well as having Cluster B Personality Traits with Antisocial Features, which were incompatible with...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004783

    Original file (AR20080004783.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100011892

    Original file (AR20100011892.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. The analyst noted the applicant's issue of not receiving campaign medals for his service in Iraq; however, the correction the applicant requests to be made to the DD Form 214, does not fall within the purview of this Board. Therefore, the analyst determined the...