Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2011/01/25 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states. I was discharged from the army due to an injury that i sustained during basic training, at the end of course. also when i was hurt they found records from my past of mental history from 2001, when i watched my grandmother get dismembered by a car. PTSD. also while in basic my mother became ill, along with the injury, i was discharged. i am still seking help for stated injury, that the VA says they wont help me with. please consider me for an upgrade so that i may one day return to our armed forces!"
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 090908
Discharge Received: Date: 090917 Chapter: 5-11 AR: 635-200
Reason: Failed Medical Physical Procurement Standards RE: SPD: JFW Unit/Location: Fort Benning, GA
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 26
Current ENL Date: 090709 Current ENL Term: 3 Years 16 weeks
Current ENL Service: 0 Yrs, 2 Mos, 9 Days ?????
Total Service: 0 Yrs, 2 Mos, 9 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-1 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: None GT: 102 EDU: GED Certif Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 31 August 2009, an Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) convened and determined that the applicants medical condition, which was diagnosed as: a depressive disorder NOS Axis II, and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the condition(s) existed prior to service. On 1 September 2009, the medical approving authority approved the findings. On 8 September 2009, the applicant was informed of the medical findings and concurred with the findings of the Entrance Physical Standard Board (EPSB) proceedings, was advised of his rights and requested to be discharged from the US Army without delay. The applicant waived his right to consult with legal counsel and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 8 September 2009, the unit commander recommended that the applicant be discharged from the service under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-11, AR 635-200, by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards with an uncharacterized discharge. On 8 September 2009, the intermediate commander concurred with the unit commander.
On 9 September 2009, the separation authority directed that the applicants be discharged from the Army with an uncharacterized separation of service.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-11 specifically provides that Soldiers who were not medically qualified under procurement medical fitness standards, when accepted for enlistment, or who became medically disqualified under these standards prior to entry on active duty or active duty training or initial entry training will be separated. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldiers initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at that time, and the medical condition does not disqualify the Soldier from retention in the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 40-501, Chapter 3. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable. However for Soldiers in entry-level status, it will be uncharacterized. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The proceedings of the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) revealed that the applicant had a medical condition which was disqualifying for enlistment and that it existed prior to entry on active duty. Subsequently, these findings were approved by competent medical authority. The applicant agreed with these findings and the proposed action for administrative separation from the Army. The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected through the separation process.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue that when he got hurt they found records from his in reference to his mental history from 2001, when he watched his grandmother get dismembered by a car; PTSD. The record does not support the issue that the applicant suffers from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, but was diagnosed by competent medical authority; Axis I, a depressive disorder NOS Axis II. Deferred.
Further, a Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status. Further, a general, under honorable conditions discharge is not authorized under ELS conditions. The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and that the rights of the applicant were fully protected through the separation process.
The applicant further contends that he would like to return to the military someday. If the applicant desires to reenlist, he should contact the local recruiter to determine his eligibility to reenlist. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes.
In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 24 August 2011 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: Online application dated 20 January 2011.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20110001611
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090002383
Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2009/02/10 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20090002383 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 2 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080018966
Applicant Name: ????? The record contains a document, subject: Counseling Reference EPSBD Proceedings, in which the Applicant stated he had been counseled about his rights in connection with processing of an Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) and had been informed he did not meet procurement medical fitness standards at the time of his enlistment. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the Applicants record and his service did not warrant an...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015344
Applicant Name: ????? On 11 August 2008, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged from the Army with an uncharacterized separation of service. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a soldier is in an entry-level status if the soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001220
Applicant Name: ????? The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the Soldier is in an entry-level status. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090005290
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008133
Applicant Name: ????? The characterization of service for soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the soldier is in an entry-level status. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a soldier is in an entry-level status if the soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080017907
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the Applicants record and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000489
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and supporting documentation submitted by the Applicant in which he states, "Because of the Uncharacterized Discharge, I am having problems with VA Benefits & employment." Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012488
However, the record shows that on 29 April 2008, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards, he was diagnosed with a right shoulder instability, and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the condition existed prior to service. The characterization of service for Soldiers...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100017072
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 November 2009, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards, in that he was diagnosed as having a bipolar disorder, and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the condition existed prior to service. Army Regulation...