ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017649
Applicant Name: ????? In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017652
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 25 April 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017654
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017657
In return i received the military outstanding volunteer service medal. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 19 March 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions b.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017664
Applicant Name: ????? After a thorough review of the applicants record and the issues he submitted, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board that clemency is not warranted. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017665
It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-27(f), NGR 600-200, by reason of unsatisfactory participation with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) Code of " 3." Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-91 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. The evidence of record shows the applicant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017668
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 24 June 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor having failed to make it to your appointed place of duty at the prescribed time on numerous occasions, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017671
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 June 2003, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the condition (right shoulder instability) existed prior to service. On 23 June 2003, the separation authority approved the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017673
Applicant Name: ????? On 12 April 2001, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017675
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After careful review of all the applicant's military records for the term of service under review, the issues and documents he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit a change to the narrative reason for discharge on the applicant's DD Form 214. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the term of service under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017681
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(1) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017684
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 11Mos, 21Days Includes 485 days of excess leave (991110-010308). The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017685
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? On 16 November 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017691
The intermediate and senior commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 22 July 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017709
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service in lieu trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017710
Applicant Name: ????? On 18 October 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The Board determined that the overall length and quality of the applicants service, to include his combat service, mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017712
The applicant consulted with legal counsel and was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The regulation also directs that commanders will not take action prescribed in this chapter in lieu of disciplinary action; requires that the diagnosis concludes the disorder is so severe that the Soldiers ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired; and states that separation for personality disorder is not appropriate...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017714
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017715
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017716
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 21 October 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017717
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017719
Applicant Name: ????? However, on 2 May 2006, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017720
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 2 No change 3 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017721
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 980501 Chapter: 8-26e (1) AR: NGR 600-200 Reason: Conviction by Civil Court RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: 82nd Maint Co, Columbus, GA Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): The applicant was reduced from "E-4" to "E-3" effective 5 May 1996. Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 00Mos, 05 Days ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017723
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 March 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for Patterns of Misconduct for repeatedly writing worthless checks, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017724
On 3 January 1996, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst found that the overall length and quality of the applicant's service; to include his combat service, his post service accomplishments (serving in the State of Oregon Army National Guard as a SSG/E-6; earned Associate Degrees in General Studies and Nursing), and the unit commander's recommendation for a honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017725
Applicant Name: ????? Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 07Mos, 24Days includes 95 days of excess leave from (061201-070305). Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017727
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 6 August 2003, the applicant was notified of initiation of elimination proceedings under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 600-8-24, paragraphs 4-2 and 4-20 by reason of substandard performannce of duty, moral and professional dereliction, and misconduct. The Ad Hoc Review Board met, and on 19 December 2003, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board, and directed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017785
On 3 October 2002, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Yes No Counsel: N/A Witnesses/Observers: N/A Exhibits Submitted: 1 VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017787
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017788
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 13 April 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017789
Applicant Name: ????? Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 5 No change 0 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017790
The Board recommended separation with a under other than honorable conditions discharge. The record contains a Army Board of Review for Elimination case dated 070409. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 080208 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20070017790 Applicant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017791
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017794
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 July 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, pattern of misconduct for drunken operation of a vehicle on two occasions with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 8 November 2006, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017810
Further, for soldiers in entry-level status, a fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Separation Because of Personality Disorder", and the separation code is "JFX." Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017816
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 July 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconductfor conduct unbecoming of a soldier, intentionally missing movement to Germany, deliberately missing three levy briefings, disrespectful and disobeyed orders from his NCO's, and countless negative counselling statements for failure to report to appointed place...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017819
On 27 February 2007, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017822
Applicant Name: ????? On 31 August 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017829
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017832
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017833
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 4 May 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct in that you received a Field Grade Article 15 for disobeying a superior commissioned officer and two alleged charges of driving under the influence of alcohol, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant waived legal counsel, was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017840
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 22 August 1997, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct for adultery, bad checks, underage drinking and several failure to repairs; with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, Paragraph...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017869
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 22 January 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct for failure to go to his appointed place of duty (060221), willfully disobeyed a lawful command from a Major General not to have contact with his spouse, drunk and disorderly, and breaking restriction (060217), and failure to go to his appointed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017872
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service-in lieu of court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018321
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 011208 Discharge Received: Date: 020212 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: A Company, 1st Battalion, 6th Infantry Regiment, Baumholder, Germany, APO, AE 09034. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018326
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-178 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel of the U.S. Army Reserve. The applicant indicated that he appeared before an administrative separation board and that the board recommended that he be discharged with issuance of a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The documentation in which the separation authority would have approved the recommendation of the administrative...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018339
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 27 November 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct in that you slept on duty while on combat patrol (050801), illegally shipped a Glock 9mm pistol from Kuwait back to the US, which resulted in a Summary Court-Martial (060126), disrespectful to a non-commissioned officer (060830), made a false...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018353
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 19 October 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense in that you were found guilty by a Summary Court-Martial for absent without leave on (990923) and you received a Field Grade Article 15 for wrongful use of marijuana on (990805), with a general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018427
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 26 April 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.