Applicant Name:
Application Receipt Date: 2007/11/27 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, "I feel that i should have my discharge changed to an honorable discharge. i made a stupid mistake once. During my time in Korea i volunteered my time to teach Korean children english for 2 months. In return i received the military outstanding volunteer service medal. I was a crewchief for the uh-60 helicopter and during an exercise i worked for 12 hours a day from 2 am to 2 pm flying generals around Korea for 3 weeks straight. For doing so i recieved the army achievement medal. I was an outstanding soldier in basic training I was top ten percent and my companies best shooter. I graduated AIT with a 93.3%. I currently am holding a very good and well paid job. If you could please find it in my favor to upgrade my discharge to Honorable. Thank you for your time i greatly appreciate it."
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 050314
Discharge Received: Date: 050326 Chapter: 14-12c AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKQ Unit/Location: 1/52 AVN, Korea
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 050217, false official statement (050130), wrongfully possess psilocybin (hallucinogenic mushrooms) X 2, wrongfully use psilocybin (hallucinogenic mushrooms), wrongfully distribute psilocybin (hallucinogenic mushrooms), reduction to E-1, $617 X 2, 14 days of extra duty and restriction (FG).
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): none
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 20
Current ENL Date: 030115 Current ENL Term: 6 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 02 Mos, 12 Days ?????
Total Service: 02 Yrs, 02 Mos, 12 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-4 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 15T10/Helicopter Repairer GT: NIF EDU: HS Overseas: Korea Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR, GWOTSM
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Puyallup, WA
Post Service Accomplishments: None listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 14 March 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct in that he received a Field Grade Article 15 for use and possession of Psilocybin (Hallucinogenic Mushrooms), a Schedule I controlled substance, and making a false official statement dated 17 February 2005, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. The applicant waived his right to consult with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his rights and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 19 March 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By his misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance. Furthermore, the analyst noted that even though a single incident, the discrediting entry constituted a departure from the standards of conduct expected of soldiers in the Army. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. The analyst having examined all the circumstances determined that the applicant's single incident of misconduct did indeed adversely affect the quality of service, brings discredit on the Army, and was prejudicial to good order and discipline. This single incident of misconduct clearly diminished the quality of the applicant's service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 15 October 2008 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NQ
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20070017657
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100026847
Applicant Name: ????? On 9 February 2006, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110020121
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states in effect he was unjustly discharged, that out of 3 other people everyone received a punishment different than the other with him being the only one to receive a discharge. On 26 June 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011969
Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 080730 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in her own behalf.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009686
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 31 August 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense, for wrongfully using marijuana (100617), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007025
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 10Mos, 04Days ????? Board Decision The discharge was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The characterization of service was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable DRB voting record: Change No change (Character) Change No change (Reason) (Board member names available upon request) IX. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004492
Applicant Name: ????? On 7 July 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, contingent upon his receiving a characterization of service of no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014022
On 20 June 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014139
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 30 January 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the Applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012691
Applicant Name: ???? By abusing illegal drugs, he knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015129
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 15 July 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.