Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017789
Original file (AR20070017789.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 071204	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: Applicant states "I feel that I proved myself and my country by going to Iraq and fighting for our countries freedom. I think that I was young and dumb at the time I was enlisted and got what I deserved. I feel that I should have gotten a honorable condition even though I didnt fullfil my military obligation, but I am fulfilling my obligation now in the Active Reserves. I think that even though I havent completed a full two years by one month I think I should desire a honorable discharge."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 020903   Chapter: 9      AR: 635-200
Reason: Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure	   RE:     SPD: JPD   Unit/Location: 44R AD Bn 1 HHB HVY Div Ft. Hood, TX 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  19
Current ENL Date: 001002    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	1 Yrs, 11Mos, 02Days ?????
Total Service:  		3 Yrs, 3Mos, 13Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	The applicant received an HD for service 060501-070912
Highest Grade: E4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 31U10 Signal Support System SPC   GT: NIF   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Iraq   Combat: Iraq (060810-070807/USAR)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM,NDSM,GWOTSM, ICM,ASR,OSR,ARFRM

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Las Cruces
Post Service Accomplishments: Enlisted in USAR was ordered to Active Duty, and earned an HD after serving in Iraq

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The specific facts and circumstances leading to the applicant’s discharge from the Army are not contained in the available records. However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature.  The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of drug rehabilitation/ASAP failure.  Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JPD with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 4. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.   Chapter 9 contains the authority and outlines the procedures for discharging individuals because of alcohol or other drug abuse.  A member who has been referred to the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program (ADAPCP) for alcohol/drug abuse may be separated because of inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully complete such a program if there is a lack of potential for continued Army service and rehabilitation efforts are no longer practical.  Army policy states that an honorable or general discharge is authorized depending on the applicant’s overall record of service.  However, an honorable discharge is required if restricted use information is used in the discharge process.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The specific facts and circumstances leading to the applicant’s discharge from the Army are not contained in the available records. However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature.  The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of drug rehabilitation/ASAP failure.  Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JPD with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 4. In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: ?????         Location: Washington DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA



























VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable.  The Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program (ADAPCP) was aware of the consequences of any action which would demonstrate any inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully complete such a program.  The Board, being convinced that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable,
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 5    No change 0
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
								         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA										
RE Code: 									 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20070017789
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007386

    Original file (AR20100007386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100010329

    Original file (AR20100010329.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 September 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to fully honorable. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012959

    Original file (AR20100012959.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 21 March 2007, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090005206

    Original file (AR20090005206.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The analyst noted that on the applicant's DD Form 214 block 27, reentry eligibility (RE) code reads "3," however, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure, according to AR 635-5-1, Separation Program Designator (SPD)/Reentry (RE) Codes Cross-Reference Table, requires a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "4." Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110010156

    Original file (AR20110010156.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, “I respectfully request my DD 214, Separation Code: JPD; Reentry Code: 4; be changed to an honorable discharge with a RE 1 code So I can be restored to the U.S. Army, my Unit and proper rank. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003413

    Original file (AR20080003413.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 060515 Discharge Received: Date: 060630 Chapter: 9 AR: 635-200 Reason: Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure RE: SPD: JPD Unit/Location: A Trp, 2/4 Cav Regt., Ft Riley, KS Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 060310, Drunk on duty (060227), Reduction to E-1 (suspended), $297 (suspended), 14 days extra duty, 14 days restriction. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003705

    Original file (AR20080003705.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record indicates that on 23 July 2007, the unit commander in consultation with the Clinical Director, Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP), declared the applicant a rehabilitation failure. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005890

    Original file (AR20120005890.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record indicates that on 14 April 2011, the unit commander in consultation with the Clinical Director/Army Substance Abuse Program declared the applicant a rehabilitation failure. Certification Signature Approval Authority: ARCHIE L. DAVIS III Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001833

    Original file (AR20090001833.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004432

    Original file (AR20080004432 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? The separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...