ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018428
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 20 November 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018431
On 8 March 2007, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 3 April 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018433
Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 040901 Discharge Received: Date: 041207 Chapter: 8-26g(3) AR: NGR 600-200 Reason: Defective Enlistment Agreement RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: TRP C 1-18th CAV, Ontario, CA Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018435
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 23 March 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct in that you failed to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty, failed to obey lawful orders, dereliction of duty and assault, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 5 April 2007, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018437
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018438
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: NA VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018440
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 31 March 1995, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct in that you received a Company Grade Article 15 for failing to go to your appointed place of duty (950120), and received numerous counseling statements for various other offenses; with a general, under honorable conditions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018441
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 16 March 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct in that you failed to go to your appointed place of duty x 2 (040917), (040927), wrongfully appropriated a vehicle, the property of a PVT (041004), and failed to obey a lawful order issued by an individual having the authority to do so (041011), which...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018443
Applicant Name: ????? On 5 June 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: None VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018445
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when her separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018448
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 01Mos, 21Days Includes 21 days of excess leave from (990324-990413). Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018450
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 4Mos, 7Days ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. By her misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of her service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018460
Applicant Name: Application Receipt Date: 2007/12/04 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 29 October 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of involuntary separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5-11, AR 635-200, by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards with an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a soldier is in an entry-level status if the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018541
An enlisted member separated for misconduct which includes unsatisfactory participation will normally be furnished a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions in accordance with Army Regulation 135-178. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available records for the period of enlistment under review, and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018678
That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-40, paragraph 24b(5) by reason of disability, other, with an honorable characterization of service. That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(5) by reason of disability, other, with an honorable characterization of service. Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue; however, the narrative reason...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018701
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor commission of a serious offense (conspired to commit larceny of private funds and made a false official statement), with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018750
The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018751
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 11 April 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconductfor constant failures to report to his appointed place of duty, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 2 No change 3 Reason - Change 0 No change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018754
Applicant Name: ????? Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue, however, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include medical and educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018755
Applicant Name: ????? The regulation also directs that commanders will not take action prescribed in this chapter in lieu of disciplinary action; requires that the diagnosis concludes the disorder is so severe that the Soldiers ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired; and states that separation for personality disorder is not appropriate when separation is warranted under chapter 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, or 15; Army Regulation 604-10 or Army Regulation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018759
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018760
Applicant Name: ????? On 9 March 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018766
Applicant Name: ????? On 9 October 1997, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018767
Applicant Name: ????? Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 7 Mos, 21Days The net active service on the DD Form 214 item 12c is incorrect, should be: 1 Year, 7 Months, 21 Days Total Service: 2 Yrs, 3 Mos, 6 Days ????? Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018768
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 2 No change 3 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018777
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 December 1999, the applicant was charged with AWOL from (990803-991126). Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018781
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service-in lieu trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018783
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 23 September 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct in that you wrongfully drove in a reckless manner (060310), assaulted a female (060310), and assaulted a PVT (E-2) (060310), broke restriction (060723), disobeyed a SGT x 2 (060912), (060913), and wrongfully fell asleep while...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018784
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 29 August 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018786
Applicant Name: ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018892
Applicant Name: ????? The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and her service did not warrant an honorable discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018908
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states in effect that "I beleive that enough time has passed for me to have a clean record. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was adjudged guilty by a court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the convening authority. After a thorough review of the applicants record and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommend to the Board no clemency.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018910
He even gave me an AR-15 once for swearing.I believe that he focused his hate on me and was determined to get me out of the Army. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 September 1993, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (Minor Disciplinary Infractions), for failure to report to your appointed place of duty X 3 with a general under honorable conditions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018913
Applicant Name: ????? However, the record does show that on 22 January 1996, the unit commander recommended separation from the service under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct; in that the applicant wrongfully used marijuana. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018914
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 February 1995, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for being counseled on numerous occasions for writing checks with insufficient funds, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018915
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: None Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: SGT/E-5 XI. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 7 February...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018916
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018918
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018920
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 12 July 1993, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018921
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived her right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. On 9 June 1997, the separation authority approved the applicant's waiver of her administrative separation board, waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018923
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 30 January 2004, the separation authority approved the findings and recommendation of the administrative separation board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018927
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 6 December 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for missing two toes on his right foot, which is not disqualifying for enlistment IAW AR 40-501, paragraph 2-10b, if function of the foot is not impaired. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018945
Applicant Name: ????? On 6 September 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018948
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 071030 Chapter: 8-35L (8) AR: NGR 600-200 Reason: Medically Unfit for Retention Per AR 40-501 RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: 623rd Pers Det, Springfield, IL Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 0 No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018951
On 31 March 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, by reason of personality disorder, diagnosed with a depressive disorder and a borderline personality disorder. On 28 April 2004, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of fully honorable. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018956
Applicant Name: ????? There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as well as the incidents of unsatisfactory performance. By his unsatisfactory performance, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable characterization of service.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018995
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 July 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct for from AWOL (020617-030715), wrongful possession and use of marijuana x 2 (031224) and (020318), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070019017
Id served as an enlisted soldier for approximately three years active and four years US Army Reserve and SC Army National Guard. On 9 July 2001, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board and directed that the applicant be discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070019019
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, by reason of a personality disorder, with service uncharacterized. Army Regulation 635-200 provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when her separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry-level status.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070019021
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 submitted by the Applicant II. The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was adjudged guilty by a court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the convening authority. After a thorough review of the applicants record and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommend to the Board no clemency.