Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070017714
Original file (AR20070017714.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 071130	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See enclosed DD Form 293 submitted by the applicant. 

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 060831
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 061004   Chapter: 14       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: 126th Trans Co, Fort Bragg, NC 

Time Lost: AWOL x 2 for 29 days (060331-060403) and (060713-060808), mode of return unknown. 

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 060829, AWOL (060713-060808), however, the continuation sheet is not part of the available record,  forfeiture of $636 x 2, extra duty for 45 days and restriction for 45 days (FG).

060421, AWOL (060331-060404), and failure to report (060330), reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $636 x 2, extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG).

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  23
Current ENL Date: 040609    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  20 Weeks
Current ENL Service: 	02 Yrs, 02Mos, 22Days ?????
Total Service:  		02 Yrs, 02Mos, 22Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 88M1P Motor Transport Operator   GT: 112   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Southwest Asia   Combat: Iraq (050226-051206)
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ICM, GWOTSM, ASR, OSR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Harleyville, SC
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed 

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       Evidence of record shows that on 31 August 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense/abuse of illegal drugs for wrongful use of cocaine (060810), and AWOL (060331-060404) and (060713-060809), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  On 11 Septemberl 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issues he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue, however, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.  In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 15 October 2008         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.













  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
								         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 									 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: None
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20070017714
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002080

    Original file (AR20080002080.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 December 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense – on 19 October 2006, you received a Field Grade Article 15 for drug use, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 21 December 2006, the separation authority approved the unconditional waiver...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011267

    Original file (AR20080011267.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 25 September 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080004290

    Original file (AR20080004290.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, "I was told six months after I had gotten discharged that I could change my other than honorable into a general under honorable conditions. On 1 February 2007, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions discharge. Accordingly, the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080006293

    Original file (AR20080006293.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct, Drug Abuse" and the separation code is "JKK." Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000625

    Original file (AR20080000625.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 7 October 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for receiving a Summary Court-Martial (070902), for failure to report, disrespect towards an officer, assaulted an NCO, dereliction of duty, consuming alcohol, resisted apprehension, and wrongfully communicated a threat towards a CPT x 3...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018945

    Original file (AR20070018945.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 6 September 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015699

    Original file (AR20080015699.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080020067

    Original file (AR20080020067.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    I had just got married to my wife and was station in korea for a year. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120020994

    Original file (AR20120020994.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 27 April 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The analyst noted the applicant met entrance qualification standards to include age.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016095

    Original file (AR20080016095.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 29 November 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...