ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | 20070007618
Legal Basis for Separation: The Board carefully examined the applicant's record of service for the period of enlistment under review. The applicant's request for separation was subsequently approved and the applicant was honorably discharged. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Yes Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: "Enlisted-Retirement - Disability, Permanent-Sfj" Other: RE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070000074
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he is not guilty of the charges. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070000098
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070000098aC071031
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070000367
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 6 October 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070000367aC071031
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 6 October 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070000421
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 03 Mos, 06 Days ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an adminstrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070000421aC071031
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an adminstrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070000481aC071031
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge and did submit a statement in his own behalf, which was not found in the available record. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070000509aC071031
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293. On 4 December 2002, the separation authority approved the discharge with a under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony, and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070000708aC071031
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 30 June 2005, the Commander, United States Army Europe and Seventh Army, APO AE 09014, notified the applicant of initiation of elimination proceedings under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 600-8-24, by reason of misconduct, moral or professional dereliction (acts of personal misconduct as substantiated by an Article 15 dated 13 October 2004 and a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand). Board Decision The discharge was: Proper...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070000753
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 December 1995, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance (he received numerous counselling statements for failing to perform his duties in a satisfactory manner, had trouble honoring his financial obligations, failed the APFT on two separate occasions for admission to BNOC, and was given ample opportunities...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070000753aC071031
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 December 1995, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance (he received numerous counselling statements for failing to perform his duties in a satisfactory manner, had trouble honoring his financial obligations, failed the APFT on two separate occasions for admission to BNOC, and was given ample opportunities...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070000768
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 16 January 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (committed a series of disciplinary infractions since his arrival in this unit, , to include disrespect, dereliction of duty, absent from place of duty, refusing to participate in training, and disobeying lawful orders from commissioned and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070000768aC071031
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 16 January 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—pattern of misconduct (committed a series of disciplinary infractions since his arrival in this unit, , to include disrespect, dereliction of duty, absent from place of duty, refusing to participate in training, and disobeying lawful orders from commissioned and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001084
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony, and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh and as a result, it is inequitable. In essence the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001084aC071031
Yes No Counsel: No Witnesses/Observers: No Exhibits Submitted: None VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony, and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh and as a result, it is inequitable. In essence the applicant’s separation action was initiated while the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001091
Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 050128 Discharge Received: Date: 050216 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Company B, 1st Battalion, 329th Infantry, Fort Benning, GA 31905 Time Lost: AWOL, for a total of 202 days from (040705-050121). Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001091aC071031
Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 050128 Discharge Received: Date: 050216 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Company B, 1st Battalion, 329th Infantry, Fort Benning, GA 31905 Time Lost: AWOL, for a total of 202 days from (040705-050121). Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001159
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 03 Mos, 28 Days ????? The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. The applicant was charged with AWOL and while still in an entry-level status voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001159aC071031
The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. Notwithstanding the propriety of the applicant’s discharge, the analyst found that the circumstances surrounding the AWOL, and the time that has elasped since his discharge mitigated the discrediting entry in his service record, and the applicant’s service should now be described as uncharacterized. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001179aC071031
However, the separation authority's documentation approving the applicant's discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge is not part of the available record and the analyst presumes Government regularity in the discharge process. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant partial relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001430aC071031
On 14 December 2005, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001435
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst noted that the unit commander used Board Procedures when notifying the applicant that he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct. Board Decision The discharge was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The characterization of service was:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001435aC071031
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst noted that the unit commander used “Board Procedures” when notifying the applicant that he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001441
Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: Secretarial Authority under Chapter 5, AR 635-200. Remarks: The Board recommends that the Adjutant General, State of Virginia, consider changing the applicants characterization of service to Honorable and the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority, and issue the applicant a new NGB Form 22. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001441aC071031
That NGB Form 22 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-27x, NGR 600-200, by reason of interstate transfer who failed to report, with a characterization of service of uncharacterized and a reenlistment eligibility code of (RE) "3." Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: Secretarial Authority under Chapter 5, AR 635-200. Remarks: The Board recommends that the Adjutant General, State...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001697aC071031
Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 911112 Discharge Received: Date: 920206 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: For The Good of Service-In Lieu of Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: 612th Quartermaster Company, Fort Bragg, NC Time Lost: Absent without leave for a total of 109 days (910620-911006). The unit commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a under other than honorable conditions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001718
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst noted that the unit commander used Board Procedures when notifying the applicant that he was initiating action...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001718aC071031
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 25 May 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001876
Previous Discharges: Total service on DD Form 214, is incorrect, should read 02 yrs, 00 mos, 08 days. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001876aC071031
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001878
Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 11 Mos, 28 Days ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 21 September 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070001878aC071031
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 13 February 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense (for disrespect toward an NCO and illegal use of marijuana), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002020aC071031
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 1 February 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense (disobeying a lawful command from a (SGT), driving while drunk on or about 14 October 2000, drunk while on duty 1 November 2000, wrongful use of marijuana between on or about 12 November 2000 and 11 December 2000, and driving while driving...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002049aC071031
On 28 September 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents he submitted, the analyst recommends that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002051
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293. Previous Discharges: USAR-860108-860123/NA ADT-860124-860509/UNC Highest Grade: E3 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No MOS: 76X10 (Subsistence Supply Specialist) GT: 86 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None Decorations/Awards: ASR, NDSM V. Post-Discharge Activity Home of Record: Current Address: Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed VI. Certification Signature and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002051aC071031
Application Receipt Date: 070209 Prior Review Prior Review Date: 960214/Records Review I. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002054
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293 and supporting documents. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation The Board found the discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002054aC071031
The separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. Yes No Counsel: Witnesses/Observers: Exhibits Submitted: VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002270aC071031
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 August 2006, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Physical Evaluation Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the conditions(s) existed prior to service. Army Regulation 635-200, provides that a soldier is in an entry-level status if...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002278
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant's military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002278aC071031
The unit commander recommended approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002280
On 11 March 2003 the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002280aC071031
On 11 March 2003 the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Yes No Counsel: N/A Witnesses/Observers: N/A Exhibits Submitted: N/A VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002285aC071031
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293. This document identifies the Army Regulation governing the separation of enlisted members from the United States Army Reserve and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s available record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002288
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Decision The discharge was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The characterization of service was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The narrative reasons were:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002288aC071031
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Decision The discharge was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The characterization of service was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The narrative reasons were:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002322
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293 and letter of support. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002322aC071031
The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Yes No Counsel: Witnesses/Observers: Exhibits Submitted: VIII.