Application Receipt Date: 070209
Prior Review Prior Review Date: 960214/Records Review
I. Applicant Request
Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Yes No Tender Offer: ?????
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: ?????
Discharge Received: Date: 930302
Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200
Reason: For the Good of the Service/In Lieu of Court-Martial
RE: SPD: KFS
Unit/Location: ?????
Time Lost: ?????
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): ?????
Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): ?????
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
DOB: 660802
Current ENL Date: 891115 Current ENL Term: 04 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: ?? Yrs, ??Mos, ??Days ?????
Total Service: ?? Yrs, ??Mos, ??Days ?????
Previous Discharges: USAR-860108-860123/NA
ADT-860124-860509/UNC
Highest Grade: E3
Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 76X10 (Subsistence Supply Specialist) GT: 86 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ASR, NDSM
V. Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record:
Current Address:
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
?????
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
?????
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 19 September 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: ?????
Witnesses/Observers: ?????
Exhibits Submitted: ?????
VIII. Board Decision
The discharge was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The characterization of service was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable
DRB voting record: Change ????? No change ????? - Character
Change ????? No change ????? - Reason
(Board member names available upon request)
IX. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
?????
Case report reviewed and verified by: Eric S. Moore, Examiner
X. Board Action Directed
No Change
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: ?????
Other: ?????
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: ?????
XI. Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority:
MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
Official:
CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 21 September 2007
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20070002051
Applicant Name: Mr.
______________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002051aC071031
Application Receipt Date: 070209 Prior Review Prior Review Date: 960214/Records Review I. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008225
Application Receipt Date: 0606509 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000129C080324
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Yes No Counsel: N/A Witnesses/Observers: N/A Exhibits Submitted: N/A VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013372
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See attached DD Form 293 along with attached documents. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009448
It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007012
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009815
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016574
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011426aC071121
Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 060125 Discharge Received: Date: 060215 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Company D, 1st Battalion, 222nd Aviation Regiment, Fort Eustis, VA 23604 Time Lost: AWOL, for a total of 133 days from (1 September 2005 to 11 January 2006). On 30 January 2006, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Yes...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070006987aC071121
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issues he submitted, the analyst found that the characterization of service granted is inequitable. The applicant was charged with AWOL and while still in an entry-level status voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial. Yes No Counsel: Witnesses/Observers: Exhibits Submitted: VIII.