Application Receipt Date: 070209
Prior Review Prior Review Date: 040310
I. Applicant Request
Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293 and supporting documents.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Yes No Tender Offer: ?????
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF
Discharge Received: Date: 030606
Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200
Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial
RE: SPD: KFS
Unit/Location: 17th Military Police Detachment, Fort Jackson, SC
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
DOB: 750415
Current ENL Date: 001010 Current ENL Term: 03 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 07Mos, 27Days ?????
Total Service: 07 Yrs, 03Mos, 08Days ?????
Previous Discharges: ARNG-960229-960715/NA
ADT-960716-961206/HD
ARNG-961207-970319/NA
RA-970320-990321/HD
RA-990322-001009/HD
Highest Grade: E5
Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 95B10 (Military Police) GT: 105 EDU: 1 yr Coll Overseas: Korea Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: AAM (3d Award), Air Force Achievement Medal, AGCM, NDSM (2d Award), NCOPDR, ASR, OSR (2d Award)
V. Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record:
Current Address:
Post Service Accomplishments: Applicant states he is currently employed by the Florida Department of Juvenile Justice where he serves as a Juvenile Justice Detention Officer II, with an additional duty of Gang Intelligence Officer.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 6 May 2003, the applicant was charged with unlawfully striking a child under the age of 16 years on the buttocks and legs with a belt 12 March 2003 and maltreating a female Soldier, a person subject to his orders, by having sex with her 30 March 2003. On 14 May 2003, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial. In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser included offense. Further, the applicant indicated that he understood that he could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veterans benefits. The applicant did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant was to be reduced to the rank of private/E1.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the independent evidence he submitted, the analyst found several mitigating factors that would warrant an upgrade of the characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. This recommendation was made after full consideration of his faithful and honorable service, as well as his record of misconduct. The evidence in this case supports a conclusion that the applicants characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is inequitable. The analyst determined that the overall length and quality of the applicant's service and the circumstances surrounding the discharge, mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record. However, the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable. This action entails a restoration of grade to sergeant/E5.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 15 May 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: none
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Decision
The discharge was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The characterization of service was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable
DRB voting record: Change No change (Character)
Change No change (Reason)
(Board member names available upon request)
IX. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
The Board found the discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it.
Case report reviewed and verified by: Eric S. Moore, Examiner
X. Board Action Directed
No Change
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: ?????
Other: ?????
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: ?????
XI. Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority:
MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW DATE: 18 May 2007
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20070002054
Applicant Name: Mr.
______________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 4 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070002054aC071031
The separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. Yes No Counsel: Witnesses/Observers: Exhibits Submitted: VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012654
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293 and supporting documents. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents he submitted, the analyst recommends that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007740
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 02Mos, 15Days ????? Accordingly, the Board voted to grant partial relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: E5 XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007840
The Board determined that the applicant's overall length and quality of service to include his combat service, mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant partial relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: E4 XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011746
Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 930406 Discharge Received: Date: 930506 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: For the Good of the Service, In Lieu of Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: 13th United States Army Field Artillery Detachment, APO NY 09354 Time Lost: Absent without leave for a total of 1,047 days (900420-930301). On 13 April 1993, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008215
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S....
AF | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070007539
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The Board found that the applicant's overall length and quality of service, to include...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013365
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See enclosed DD Form 293 and attached documents (8) submitted by the Applicant. On 24 October 2003, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: ?????
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014934
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293 and supporting documents. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010459
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 11 Mos, 20 Days ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is inequitable. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: None Other:...