Application Receipt Date: 070209
Prior Review Prior Review Date: 960214/Records Review
I. Applicant Request
Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Yes No Tender Offer:
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date:
Discharge Received: Date: 930302
Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200
Reason: For the Good of the Service/In Lieu of Court-Martial
RE: SPD: KFS
Unit/Location:
Time Lost:
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment):
Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment):
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldier’s Overall Record
DOB: 660802
Current ENL Date: 891115 Current ENL Term: 04 Years
Current ENL Service: Yrs, Mos, Days
Total Service: Yrs, Mos, Days
Previous Discharges: USAR-860108-860123/NA
ADT-860124-860509/UNC
Highest Grade: E3
Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 76X10 (Subsistence Supply Specialist) GT: 86 EDU: HS Grad
Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ASR, NDSM
V. Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record: Georgetown, KY
Current Address: 420 Tibbs Lane
Lexington KY 40511
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the
separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides,
in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses
for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may
submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of
trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after
charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of
guilt. Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge
is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is
normally considered appropriate.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 19 September 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel:
Witnesses/Observers:
Exhibits Submitted:
VIII. Board Decision
The discharge was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The characterization of service was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable
DRB voting record: Change No change -
Character
Change No change -
Reason
(Board member names available upon
request)
IX. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
Case report reviewed and verified by: Eric S. Moore, Examiner
X. Board Action Directed
No Change
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to:
Other:
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:
XI. Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority:
MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
Official:
CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 21 September 2007
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011538
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Yes No Counsel: N/A Witnesses/Observers: N/A Exhibits Submitted: N/A VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010459
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 11 Mos, 20 Days ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is inequitable. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: None Other:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060002676
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009217
Application Receipt Date: 060627 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 07 Mos, 15 Days ????? On 15 February 2006, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008225
Application Receipt Date: 0606509 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006717
On 18 May 2005, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011694
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 10 Mos, 28 Days ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 11 September 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011519
Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 030807 Discharge Received: Date: 030827 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Troop B, 5th Battalion, 15th Cavalry, Fort Knox, KY 40121-5238 Time Lost: AWOL, for a total of 44 days, from (030620-030803). On 13 August 2003, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011426aC071121
Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 060125 Discharge Received: Date: 060215 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Company D, 1st Battalion, 222nd Aviation Regiment, Fort Eustis, VA 23604 Time Lost: AWOL, for a total of 133 days from (1 September 2005 to 11 January 2006). On 30 January 2006, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Yes...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070012357
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service-in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.