ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012258
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 7 April 1993, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (receiving a company grade Article 15 on 4 February 1993 for assault; receiving a company grade Article 15 on 22 February 1993, failing to go to extra duty; and receiving several counseling statements X 4, 24 February 1993, 25 February 1993, 9 March...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012260
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 25 October 1991, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012262
The evidence of record shows that on 24 October 1994, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (she was diagnosed as having an adjustment disorder with depressed mood), with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records for the period of enlistment under review,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012263
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012265
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 02 Mos, 06 Days ????? His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5-11, AR 635-200 by reason of failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards, with service uncharacterized. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012266
Current ENL Service: 05 Yrs, 05 Mos, 00 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 3 August 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductabuse of illegal drugs (tested positive for illegal use of drugs (marijuana), between on or about 25 May 1998 and 25 June 1998), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012267
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012268
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of KFS (i.e., in lieu of trial by court-martial) with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "4."
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012270
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012272
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 8 June 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (receiving two field grade Article 15's (sexual harassing two different Soldiers, two counts of providing false official statements, assault, unlawful entry with the intent to commit a criminal offense and adultery), counseled for lack of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012423
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012477
On 28 July 2006, the separation authority approved the discharge with a under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 29...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012489
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 with two (2) attachments. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 28 September 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012651
On 060316 the unit commander requested legal action in the form of a Filed Grade Article 15. On 3 May 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 11 April 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012652
Current ENL Service: 08 Yrs, 06 Mos, 24 Days ????? Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-91 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 12 October 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012653
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 09 Mos, 14 Days ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: None Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012654
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293 and supporting documents. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents he submitted, the analyst recommends that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012657
Current ENL Service: 0 Yrs, 9 Mos, 16 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 July 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l3, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance (you failed three Army Physical Fitness Test's, on 23 April, 1999, and two make-up record APFTs on 4 June 1999 and 17 June 1999), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012667
The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012668
She stated also that she would like to return to military service and needs an upgrade of her characterization of service in order for her to do so. Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 9 Mos, 9 Days ????? Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 11 April 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012678
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012748
On 18 April 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual admission (he had the propensity to engage in sexual activity with members of the same sex), with an honorable discharge. Subsequent to the applicant's admission, the unit commander properly initiated discharge proceedings under the provisions of Chapter 15, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual admission, with an honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012761
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 01Mos, 18Days ????? The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as physical condition, not a disability, with the characterization of service as uncharacterized. Army Regulation 635-40, Chapter 5-5b, provides, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012811
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012917
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 09 Mos, 20 Days ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012926
On 19 September 1996, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial. The unit commander's recommendation for approval of the requested separtation action was not found in the available record and the analyst presumed Government Regularity in the discharge process. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012930
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 05 Mos, 06 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 December 1991, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct (he received two Company Grade Article 15s for theft and not going to his appointed place of duty), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012932
On 25 May 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony, and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012935
On 24 August 2004, the separation authority approved the discharge and directed issuance of an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions Discharge. Board Decision The discharge was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The characterization of service was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable DRB voting record: Change No change (Character) Change No change (Reason) (Board member names available upon request) IX. Board Action Directed No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012936
Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 980831 Discharge Received: Date: 980928 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: D Company, 2nd Battalion, 5th Cavalry, Fort Hood, TX Time Lost: Absent without leave for a total of 31 days (980515-980614). Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012940
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 11 July 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (making false official statements and sexual harassment against another Soldier), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 26 July 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012944
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? The overall length and quality of the applicant's service , his post service accomplishments, and the unit commander's recommendation for retention mitigated the single discrediting entry in his service record. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012945
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 April 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense (use of cocaine, 29 days AWOL, disrespect to a commissioned officer, and overindulgence of alcohol), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012946
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 15 August 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for failing to obey a regulation, disobeying a lawful order from an NCO, domestic disturbance, and simple assault. The unit commander recommended the applicant be discharged from the Army with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012948
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 9 December 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012949
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 05 Mos, 24 Days ????? On 19 July 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony, and considering the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012951
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, the analyst found several mitigating factors that would merit a partial upgrade of the applicant's characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. The analyst found that the length and quality of the applicant's service, to include his combat service, and the circumstances surrounding his discharge mitigated the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012954
This document identifies the Army Regulation governing the separation of enlisted members from the United States Army Reserve and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel) provides for the separation of enlisted personnel of the Army Reserve and Army National Guard. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and his service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012964
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 12 April 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct (receiving a General Letter of Reprimand; Field Grade Article 15; and a Company Grade Article 15), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012965
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 2 August 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductwrongful use of marijuana, which resulted in company grade Article 15, with a general discharge. On 21 September 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012967
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 04 Mos, 29 Days ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 12 October 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20060012967 Applicant Name:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012998
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 26 January 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 18 February 2004,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012999
Total time lost 34 days. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013001
Application Receipt Date: 060911 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. On 16 May 2005, the separation authority approved the separation action and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions with an SPD code of "JKB" an a reentry eligibility code (RE) of "4." Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013002
Current ENL Service: 3 Yrs, 0 Mos, 28 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 2 July 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (you tested positive for cocaine between on or about 9 December 2004 and between on or about 14 December 2004 for which you received an Article 15, and you tested positive for Methamphetamine...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013003
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: E3 XI. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 8 May 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013005
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant stated, "I request for the Army Review Boards Agency to change my Reentry code on my DD214 from a 4 to a 3, and change my discharge from General Under Honorable Conditions to a Full Honorable discharge. On 28 May 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013006
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013007
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293. Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was released from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, with a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 2...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013008
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of this prior to requesting discharge. Board...