Application Receipt Date: 060906
Prior Review Prior Review Date: None
I. Applicant Request
Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Yes No Tender Offer: ?????
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 020814
Discharge Received: Date: 020819
Chapter: 5 AR: 635-200
Reason: Physical Condition, Not A Disability
RE: SPD: JFV
Unit/Location: Retraining and Holding Unit, Training Support Battalion, USAMANSCEN&FLW, Fort Leonard Wood, MO 65473
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
DOB: 830908
Current ENL Date: 020702/OAD Current ENL Term: 18 Weeks ?????
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 01Mos, 18Days ?????
Total Service: 00 Yrs, 01Mos, 18Days ?????
Previous Discharges: USAR-011024-020701/NA
Highest Grade: E2
Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: None GT: NIF EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: None
V. Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record:
Current Address:
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The applicant's documentation indicating he was diagnosed by competent medical authority is not a part of the available military records and the analyst presumed Government Regularity in the discharge process. The evidence of record shows that on 14 August 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of "Other Medical Conditions," (for emotional control, behavioral problems incompatible with military service), with an uncharacterized separation of service. He was advised of his rights. The applicant waived consultation with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and wavier of further rehabilitative efforts. On 15 August 2002, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized separation of service.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-17 provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, that interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. The regulation requires that the condition interferes with the Soldiers ability to perform duty, and requires that the diagnosis be so severe that the Soldiers ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired. Army policy states that the service of personnel separated under this paragraph will be characterized as honorable, general, under honorable conditions, or uncharacterized if in entry-level status. A general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally inappropriate for individuals separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-17.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants available military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issue he submitted, the analyst recommends that relief be denied in this case. The analyst noted from the evidence of record that the applicant received an uncharacterized separation of service while in an entry level status (ELS). The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as physical condition, not a disability, with the characterization of service as uncharacterized. A Soldier is in ELS for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period. Army Regulation 635-40, Chapter 5-5b, provides, that a Soldiers service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status. A fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicants record and his service did not warrant an honorable characterization of service. The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and that the rights of the applicant were fully protected through the separation process. Therefore, the the analyst determined that reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 3 October 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Decision
The discharge was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The characterization of service was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable
DRB voting record: Change 0 No change 5 - Character
Change 0 No change 5 - Reason
(Board member names available upon request)
IX. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief.
Case report reviewed and verified by: Eric S. Moore, Examiner
X. Board Action Directed
No Change
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
XI. Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority:
MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
Official:
CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 11 October 2007
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20060012761
Applicant Name: Mr.
______________________________________________________________________
Page 5 of 5 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014818
Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as physical condition, not a disability, with the characterization of service as uncharacterized. An RE Code of 3 indicates that the applicant requires a waiver prior to being allowed to reenlist.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006016
The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it. Certification Signature and Date Approval...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011277
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 November 1995, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards, he was diagnosed with asthma and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the condition existed prior to service. Board Action Directed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006269
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 December 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of involuntary separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of condition, not a disability with an uncharacterized discharge. On 10 Dec 2008, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized separation of service. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014939
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 March 1997, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for writing checks without sufficient funds, for failure to pay debts, and for failure to report, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 9 July 1997, the separation authority notified the applicant that he was initiating action to vacate...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014551
On 14 April 2004, the General Court Martial Convening Authority directed that only the sentence as provided for a Bad Conduct Discharge, confinement for 9 months, and reduction to the grade of E-1 is approved and, except for the part of the sentence extending to a BCD, will be executed. After a thorough review of the applicant's record and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board no clemency. Certification Signature and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009428
The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with an uncharacterized separation of service. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 25 June 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010072
Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 961011 Discharge Received: Date: 961023 Chapter: 11 AR: 635-200 Reason: Entry Level Performance and Conduct. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010455
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The analyst recommends to the Board that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remain both proper and equitable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012693
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2)(e), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of marijuana on three occasions between (010128-010228, 010924-011024 and 011111-011211), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 16 August 2002, the applicant consulted with legal counsel again...