ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012038
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 06 Mos, 21 Days ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issues she submitted, the analyst recommends that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012039
Current ENL Service: 3 Yrs, 8 Mos, 6 Days The net active service this period on the applicant's DD Form 214, item 12c is incorrect, the applicant has a period of AWOL, and civil confinement, that is not shown on the DD Form 214, item 29, time lost. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue he submitted, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012040
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? On 29 December 1994, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 11 May 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012042
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issue he...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012043
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 30 September 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012045
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 9 May 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (receiving two field grade Article 15's; wrongful use of marijuana and absent without leave, and a second for disobeying lawful ordes from his chain of command) with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012046
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 18 May 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense/abuse of illegal drugs, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 27 June 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012048
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 11 January 1995, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance (FTRs, Company Grade Article 15, and making a false statement on an individual sick slip, DD Form 689 ), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012049
Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 040908 Discharge Received: Date: 041028 Chapter: 14 AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKQ Unit/Location: 403rd Transportation Company, 7th Transportation Battalion, Fort Bragg, NC 28310-5000 Time Lost: Absent without leave for a total of 147 days (040317-040810). Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 8 September 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012051
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 9 April 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (you have been counseled in writing for possession of tobacco product in violation of Battalion policy, wrongfully writing bad checks in the amount of $1737.00 to several different agencies, and failing to be at your appointed place of duty. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012060
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 20 May 2006, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012062
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 28 November 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (absent himself from his unit between on or about 15 August 2005 and 16 August 2005, failure to go to his place of duty X 6, on or about 23 January 2005, 23 February 2005, 15 March 2005, 16 March 2005, and 2 August 2005, wrongfully used a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012063
Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 7 Mos, 13 Days ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 1 May 2001, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012064
This would change his "Total Service" from 2 yrs, 4 mos, and 18 days, to 2 yrs, 2 mos, and 18 days. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012065
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 02 Mos, 15 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 9 September 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (court-martialed for for being AWOL four times and failure to report twice), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012067
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 06 Mos, 27 Days ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available military records for the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst recommends that relief be denied in this case. In the absence of corroborated evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012069
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst recommends that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012070
The Ad Hoc Review Board met, and on 28 April 1998, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board, and directed that the applicant be discharge from the United States Army Reserve with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 600-8-24, by reason of unacceptable conduct, with a characterization of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012072
Application Receipt Date: 060823 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 October 1996, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Entrance Physical Standards Board (EPSBD) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the conditions(s) existed prior to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012074
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 20 November 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (physically abused his spouse on several occasions and disobeyed a NCO), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 6 Dcember 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012075
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 06Mos, 15Days ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 20 September 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012076
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012078
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 0 Mos, 26 Days ????? That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012079
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 8 April 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (absent without leave from 27 December 2000 to 8 January 2001, testing positive for marijuana X 2, 11 January 2001 and 19 December 2001, which he received Field Grade Article 15's), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012080
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 00 Mos, 01 Days ????? Accordingly, relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority is recommended to the Board. Board Decision The discharge was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The characterization of service was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable DRB voting record: Change 5 No change 0...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012082
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 03 Mos, 13 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 November 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct (he cannot or will not adapt socially or emotionally to military life), with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012093
On 2 April 1992, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial. On 14 April 1992, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue he submitted, the analyst found several...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012095
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012195
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The board recommended that the applicant be separated from the U.S. Army with a characterization of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012197
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached document. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c, by reason of misconduct-awol, with a characterization of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012200
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The board recommended that the applicant be separated from the service with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 26 September...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012202
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 4 Mos, 24 Days ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Accordingly, full relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012203
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012205
Current ENL Service: 0 Yrs, 4 Mos, 2 Days ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 28 September 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012207
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012209
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 09 Mos, 26 Days ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review, the evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was adjudged guilty by court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the convening authority. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012210
On 12 December 1991, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: None Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: SGT/E5 XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012211
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 26 September 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012214
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 06 Mos, 04 Days ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012216
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 08 Mos, 27 Days ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 18 March 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012218
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012220
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service-in lieu of court-martial, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012222
Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 060227 Discharge Received: Date: 060421 Chapter: 14 AR: AR 635-200 Reason: Misconduct (AWOL) RE: SPD: JKD Unit/Location: Company P, 266th Quartermaster Battalion, Fort Lee, VA Time Lost: The applicant was AWOL for a total of 17 days from (060128-060131), and (060202-060216). On 11 April 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012224
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 10 Mos, 26 Days ????? The senior commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 17 December 1999, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012225
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 30 January 2006 , the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense/awol on two separate occasions, failure to repair x 4, and disobaying an order from the company commander), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012236
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 22 May 2005, the applicant was notified of initiation of elimination proceedings under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 600-8-24, by reason of substandard performance of duty. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the term of service under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the narrative reason for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012243
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents. Current ENL Service: 04 Yrs, 05 Mos, 04 Days ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh and as a result it is inequitable, based...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012250
The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 24 November 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012253
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012257
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 11 Mos, 22 Days ????? Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: None Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: SGT/E5 XI.