ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013009
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of her case by an administrative separation board if she receives an honorable characterization of service, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issue she submitted, the analyst found no mitigating...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013010
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013011
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 5 Mos, 22 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 10 September 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (you received a Field Grade article 15 for use of cocaine), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 25 Septembe 2002, the separation authority waived further...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013013
Current ENL Service: 04 Yrs, 00 Mos, 12 Days The applicant's ETS was adjusted to make up lost time due to 3 months confinement as a result of his special court-martial. Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (found guilty of two specifications of false statements, and three specifications of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013020
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. On 25 July 2000, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) accepted the applicant's resignation, approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board, and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The appropriate authority approved the applicant's request and issuance of a general, under than honorable conditions characterization of service.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013023
Board Decision The discharge was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The characterization of service was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable DRB voting record: Change 0 No change 5 - Character Change 0 No change 5 - Reason (Board member names available upon request) IX. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: ????? ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013024
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant stated that he was young and not very mature; while attending basic training to become a infantryman he excelled in all areas except physical training; therefore, he was re-cycled; upon arriving at his new unit, he was criticized by his new chain of command for being physical fit. The unit commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a under other...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013025
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 30 June 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct, disobeying a lawful order from a Superior NCO, an Article 15 for wrongful use of Cocaine and Summary Court Martial for a second offense of wrongful use of Cocaine, with an under other than honorable discharge. The applicant consulted with legal...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013026
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct (he was disrespectful in language and deportment toward noncommissioned officers, failed to obey lawful orders, and failed to to be at his appointed place of duty on numerous occasions), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013027
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 08 Mos, 23 Days ????? Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: None Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: PFC/E3 XI. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 5 November 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013028
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 14 December 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12c AR 635-200, by reason of Misconduct, Commission of a Serious Offense, (wrongfully using a controlled substance, marijuana) with a general under honorable condition discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013029
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony, and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is inequitable. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013030
Application Receipt Date: 060914 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013031
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 11Mos, 08Days ????? On 6 January 1992, the separation authority approved the bar to reenlistment and directed the applicant be advised that should he feel he will be unable to overcome the bar to reenlistment, he may request immediate discharge under the provisions of Chapter 16, AR 635-200. On 15 January 1992, the applicant requested discharge under the provisions of Chapter 16, AR 635-200, locally imposed bar to reenlistment.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013032
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013033
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: None Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013034
Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is inequitable. The Board found that the applicant's length of service to include his combat service, mitigated the discrediting entry in his service record. Certification Signature and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013036
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The characterization of service for Soldiers separated under this provision of the regulation will normally be honorable, unless the Soldier is in entry-level status. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 5 November 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD -...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013039
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge and referred the case to an administrative separation board. On 14 October 2003, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions and that he be reduced to private/E1. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E....
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013040
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 04 Mos, 07 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 11 September 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance (failed two consecutive record Army Physical Fitness Tests on 1 July and 29 September), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013142
Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 041013 Chapter: 12 AR: 135-178 Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: NA Unit/Location: 311th Theater Signal Command USAR Element, Fort Meade, MD 20755 Time Lost: NIF Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. In the absence of corroborated evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013152
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 with four (4) attachments II. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013153
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 25 May 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense , Absent Without Leave from 17 July 2001 to 5 April 2004, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013155
Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013158
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 12 December 1996, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (uttered six worthless checks totaling $1700.00 and failed to place sufficient funds in Pentagon Federal Credit Union for payment of such checks between 4 October 1996 and 21 October 1996; disobeyed a lawful command from a noncommissioned...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013162
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 01 Mos, 14 Days ????? On 7 January 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013166
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 09 Mos, 25 Days ????? On 29 June 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 22 October 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013169
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 09 Mos, 17 Days ????? By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 071019 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013204
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. On 4 March 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental conditions (diagnosed by a psychiatrist with a depressive disorder, not otherwise specified and recurrent occupational problem), with a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service. Board Discussion,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013207
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 17 December 2001, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013208
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 05 Mos, 01 Days ????? By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 071019 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013209
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 02 Mos, 22 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 September 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for wrongful use of LSD (000324-000326), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013210
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 04 Mos, 03 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (violations of the UCMJ), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013212
Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013218
Application Receipt Date: 2006/09/15 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a soldier is in an entry-level status if the soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. A soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013221
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013344
On 7 August 2006, after a records review by the Army Discharge Review Board the applicant's discharge was upgraded to fully honorable. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: None Exhibits Submitted: None VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013346
Current ENL Service: 3 Yrs, 6 Mos, 10 Days ????? On 10 March 1992, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013350
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 10 Mos, 24 Days ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval with a general discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013352
11 March 2004, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013353
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel) provides for the separation of enlisted personnel of the Army Reserve and Army National Guard. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013354
Application Receipt Date: 060918 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293 and supporting documents. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service-in lieu of court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013356
Application Receipt Date: 2006/09/08 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013358
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Each case is decided on its own merits when an applicant submits a DD Form 293 requesting a change in discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013360
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKQ (i.e. misconduct - commission of a serious offense). That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013361
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 October 1991, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l3, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance (you will not develop sufficiently to become a satisfactory soldier; received a field grade article 15, and repeated counseling statements), with a general discharge. On 15 October 1991, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013362
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 30 August 2006, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The Board found that the overall length and quality of the applicant's service, to include his combat service, and the circumstances surrounding his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013365
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013366
On 28 June 2006, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 21 June 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013367
Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 11 Mos, 4Days The applicant was placed on excess leave for a total of 104 days from (050708-051019). Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the...