ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016078C070206
The applicant requested correction of his records to show award of the Silver Star. There are no orders or other evidence authorizing award of this decoration. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows award of the Vietnam Service Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016082C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 August 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050016082 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. There are no orders in the applicant's records to show the Combat Infantryman Badge. The Certificate of Award for the Combat Infantryman Badge shows that the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge on 19...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016088C070206
Jonathan Rost | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that her records be corrected by showing she was promoted to the pay grade of E-5, with back pay and allowances. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant was promoted to the pay grade of E-5, with entitlement to pay and allowances from 15...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016091C070206
The applicant's name appears on the 27 March 1990 Department of the Army (DA) 555th Military Police Company memorandum which authorized members of the command to wear the right shoulder sleeve insignia and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for wartime service from 20 December 1989 through 31 January 1990 during Operation Just Cause in Panama. The evidence of record indicates that while serving in Panama during Operation Just Cause the applicant was injured as the result of being hit by a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016097C070206
The applicant requests that his records be corrected by upgrading his discharge to honorable. However, his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) indicates he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 10, on 10 March 1975, under conditions other than honorable, and issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. Army Regulation 635-200 also states that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016104C070206
A Retirement Credits Report from the Maryland ARNG on file shows that between 1975 and 1987, the applicant completed 12 years of qualifying service for non-regular retirement. On 21 December 1988, the applicant was informed that he had been twice non-selected for promotion, and that he had the options of requesting retention to complete 20 years of qualifying service, requesting discharge from the USAR, or requesting transfer to the Retired Reserve. It further indicates that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016105C070206
There were no medical records available to the Board and the applicant provided no medical records. The applicant’s contention that because she had a physical profile throughout her military career and she should have been medically discharged is without foundation. The evidence of record indicates that in spite of the profile, the applicant was promoted and continued to perform her military duties until she was released from active duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016116C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 July 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050016116 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be corrected to show the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device and the Purple Heart. The applicant requested correction of his records to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016118C070206
The Memorandum of Record states the applicant's effective date of promotion to 1LT was 2 October 2004 when the APFT and MAW promotion qualifications were met IAW Army Regulation 135- 155, paragraph 4-8. The applicant completed the AMEDD Officer Basic Course (Reserve Component) on 13 June 2003 and her DA Form 1059 indicates she met the height and weight standard at that time. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016128C070206
He states that having his discharge upgraded and his reason and authority for discharge changed will make his life complete. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. While the Board has taken cognizance of the applicant's age at the time of his offense, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016139C070206
Qawly Sabree | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He cited as the basis for the GOMOR that the applicant had regularly violated security procedures and exhibited unprofessional and embarrassing behavior, that he exposed an intelligence source’s identity to foreign government attaches’, that he frequently kept classified material outside the office where it could not be secured, that he compromised physical...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016141C070206
A 25 August 2003 memorandum from the 82nd Soldier Support Battalion, Fort Bragg, North Carolina states that it confirmed that the applicant had been over charged 69 days leave while on temporary duty (TDY). The Chief, Policy Liaison and Procedures Branch stated that based on the orders and statements the Soldier provided the applicant should not have been charged with leave for the period in question. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016149C070206
The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation) to show his service in Okinawa. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Unfortunately, the applicant's service record is not available.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016150C070206
The applicant requests that his 1991 separation document be corrected to reflect completion of Noncommissioned Officer Development Course, Primary Leadership Development Course, Hybrid Maintenance Course, Bus Driver Course, and Fiber Optics Communications Course. All of the courses were completed in Germany and none of the courses were recorded on his separation document. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016151C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, removal of a Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ (DA Form 2627) from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Paragraph 3-43 of the military justice regulation contains guidance on the transfer or removal of records of nonjudicial punishment (DA Form 2627) from the OMPF. It states, in pertinent part, applications for removal of an Article 15 from the OMPF based on an error or injustice will be made to the Army Board for Correction of Military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016162C070206
On 5 November 1973, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he be issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. On 20 April 1979, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) determined that the applicant’s discharge was proper and equitable and voted to deny the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016166C070206
On 14 June 2005, the applicant was recommended for discharge from the ARNG for having received a 30 percent disability rating from the DVA. The law that authorizes a 15-year retirement for Reserve members specifically applies only to members with physical disabilities not incurred in line of duty. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. voiding his 31 July 2005...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016174C070206
In accordance with Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to change a discharge due to matters which should have been raised in the appellate process, rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process if clemency is determined to be appropriate. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016175C070206
It states, in pertinent part, that the information contained on the DD Form 214 will apply only to the period of service covered by the DD Form 214, unless otherwise specified, and that only those specialties that have been awarded in accordance with Army Regulation 611- 201 and that have been held for at least 1 year, are authorized for entry on the DD Form 214. In accordance with the applicable regulation, the USAR service that was completed after the period covered should not be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016181C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 AUGUST 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050016181 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant should be awarded the CIB. Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or injustice now under consideration on 10 June...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016182C070206
The applicant continued to serve in the USAR until he was released from his TPU effective 1 August 1996, at the age of 49 years, 5 months, and 18 days, and was transferred to the Retired Reserve, due to completion of maximum authorized years of service, in the rank of SFC. For USAR, the Soldier must have at least 20 years of qualifying service for retired pay at age 60, is a SFC/PLT (platoon sergeant) or below, and has completed 21 years of total military service. Therefore, his request...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016183C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, that both of his awards for the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and his military education be added to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). However, his record will not be corrected to show his service in Afghanistan under item 12f "Foreign Service" on of his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected as follows: a. by adding the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016189C070206
The application submitted in this case is dated 9 September 2005. The DD Form 214 issued at the time of the applicant's discharge shows that he was separated under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) for the good of the service in lieu of general court martial. However, there is no evidence and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence showing that his acts of indiscipline were as a result of the head injury.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016195C070206
The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant's separation document shows that he entered active duty as a commissioned officer on 16 October 1942. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year statute of limitations prescribed by law.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016198C070206
The applicant provides two applications. On 16 March 1988, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) notified the applicant that his request for an upgrade of his discharge to that of a general or honorable discharge was denied. Good post service conduct alone is not a basis for upgrading a discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016199C070206
On 10 November 1976, after consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted a request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge on 12 January 1977 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service. Since the applicant’s record of service included one nonjudicial punishment and a serious drug offense that led to referral...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016202C070206
William F. Crain | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. That paragraph states that there are basically three requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016203C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, award of two Army Commendation Medals (ARCOM), Combat Infantry Badge (CIB), and all medals and awards associated with deployment in support of Operation Desert Spring and Operation Iraqi Freedom. There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant should be awarded the CIB. There is no evidence and the applicant did not provide any to show he served in support of specific operations that would qualify him for the award of the Kosovo...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016205C070206
The applicant requests that the Record of Proceedings under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice be set aside, that her rank of sergeant (SGT), E-5 be restored, and her disability severance pay be paid at her last rank successfully held which was SGT, E-5. The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); a Certificate To Return To Work Or School; her Medical Appointment Reminder Cards; an Adult Placement Form; her Honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016217C070206
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that: a. the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, it is appropriate to award the applicant the Good Conduct Medal for his period of service from 15 September 1966 through 26 June 1968. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016231C070206
The applicant requests, in effect, transfer to the Retired Reserve with entitlement to retired pay. Soldiers removed from an active status will be discharged or, if qualified and if they so request, will be transferred to the Retired Reserve. The evidence of records shows that the applicant was qualified for transfer to the Retired Reserve in view of his completion of 28 qualifying years of service for Reserve retirement.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016237C070206
Rea Nuppenau | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 8 January 1980, he was commissioned as a United States Army Reserve (USAR) Judge Advocate General (JAG) captain and was ordered to active duty on 13 January 1980 for a period of 3 years. He had over 32 years of commissioned service at the time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016245C070206
On 9 September 1980, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and be reduced to Private/pay grade E-1. The evidence of record shows that the applicant had accepted NJP and was convicted by a civil court for theft in the first degree. The evidence provides sufficient basis for an under other than honorable conditions discharge for misconduct and conviction by civil court.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016249C070206
It also shows the SPD code with a corresponding RE code and states that more than one RE code could apply. The regulation shows that the SPD "JCC", as shown on the applicant's DD Form 214, is appropriate for discharge when the narrative reason for discharge is "reduction in force" due to a HQDA bar to reenlistment. The evidence shows that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 16, paragraph 16-8, due to reduction in force.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016253C070206
The applicant states, in effect, that she is appealing her BCD as it presents an injustice to the individual she is. On 28 November 1989, the applicant was discharged from the Army pursuant to the sentence of the general court-martial and was issued a BCD. She was discharged pursuant to the sentence of a general court-martial and was issued a BCD.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016254C070206
The applicant requests correction to his records to show the award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant requests correction to his records to show the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant's records do show he was assigned to an Infantry unit; however, there is no evidence in the available records to show he was present under fire while engaged in ground combat with the enemy.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016255C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 August 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050016255 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016259C070206
The applicant initially requested, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he remained on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) when he was ordered to active duty on 1 May 2002; and that he be considered for promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC) by a Special Selection Board under Reserve Component Selection Board (RCSB) criteria. The applicant's contention that he should have been retained on the RASL at the time he was ordered to active duty under the provisions of 10 USC...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016278C070206
He had served 4 months and 2 days of active service during this enlistment. However, the applicant admits that he requested to be discharged rather than to await the results of the SMEB and his records do contain a duly authenticated NGB Form 22 which shows that he was honorably discharged on 7 May 2003, under the provisions of paragraph 8-26J(1), National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 due to being medically unfit for retention. Notwithstanding the decision of the SMEB, 4 months after his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016314C070206
The evidence shows the applicant served in Vietnam. The Bronze Star Medal is already shown on the applicant's DD Form 214; however, these orders show beyond a reasonable doubt the approximate time of his service in Vietnam and the unit to which the applicant was assigned at the time of his service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal, with one bronze service star, that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016318C070206
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 July 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050016318 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Edward E. Montgomery | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016321C070206
The applicant states he was initially appointed as a second lieutenant on 12 September 2004 in the Idaho Army National Guard (IDARNG) and, through no fault of his own and due to administrative error at the State Headquarters, the original documentation was not sent to the National Guard Bureau (NGB) for processing of his permanent Oath of Office for Federal Recognition. The evidence of records shows that the applicant was granted temporary Federal Recognition effective 12 September 2004...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016327C070206
The applicant requests correction of the date on his bonus addendum to show 10 September 2002. On an unknown date, the applicant signed a statement indicating he accepted the date error on his bonus addendum that was attached to his contract dated 3 September 2002. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016333C070206
The applicant provides old and new NGB Forms 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board) and NGB Forms 337 (Oaths of Office), copies of his DA Form 71 (Oath of Office - Military Personnel), State Appointment Orders, Federal Recognition Board Memo's, and new Federal Recognition Orders, in support of his request. Evidence shows the applicant was considered and approved by a Federal Recognition Examining Board on 10 September 2004, orders were published, and the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016340C070206
He states that he believes that the effective date of his antedated Enlistment Contract should be 21 February 2005 and not 3 August 2004. The director stated that the applicant's ETS date was 2 August 2004 according to his Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment dated 24 July 2003, and that the memorandum approving the antedated reenlistment directed that the Department of the Army authorized date of 3 August 2004 would be used when preparing the DD Form 4/1. The director indicated...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016343C070206
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's separation document does not include the PH in the list of authorized awards contained in Item 27, and Item 29 contains the entry "None", which indicates he was never wounded in action. However, absent any evidence of record confirming that the wound in question required medical treatment, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the PH has not been satisfied in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016350C070206
The applicant provides copies of a Request for Federal Recognition Board Action memorandum, dated 3 September 2004, his NGB Form 89, dated 3 September 2004; his appointment orders, dated 6 September 2004; his Oath of Office, dated 6 September 2004; his NGB Form 89, dated 12 September 2005; a Request for Federal Recognition Board Action memorandum, dated 13 September 2005; his appointment orders, dated 13 September 2005; his Oath of Office, dated 13 September 2005; and his Federal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016352C070206
However, should the initial period of temporary Federal Recognition expire due to administrative processing delays, through no fault of the member, a subsequent Federal Recognition Board should be convened to consider the request again and grant another new period of temporary Federal Recognition if warranted. If the member meets the qualifications and requirements for Federal Recognition, the Chief, NGB extends permanent Federal Recognition to the member in the grade and branch in which...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016357C070206
The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error which occurred on 15 July 1968, the date of his discharge from active duty. Evidence of records show that the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, there is no basis to grant award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal to the applicant in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016361C070206
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides 41 pages of a personal accounting of his personal history prior to his assignment to Korea, his actions of 16 – 17 June 1952, a recounting of the official after action report, his analysis of the "misrepresentation" of the facts in the after actions report, nine repetitious submissions of his own personal letters and statements, and five eyewitness statements. Therefore, no correction of the official records or...