ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063971C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063973C070421
The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 November 1985. The applicant’s separation authority on his DD Form 214 was listed as “to be determined.” The conversion of the QMP from a Headquarters Department of the Army bar to reenlistment to a Headquarters Department of the Army administrative separation program was approved around early 1998. The appropriate selection boards evaluate past performances and estimate the potential of each soldier to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063974C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063980C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In the first letter, the FSM informs his mother that he was wounded, “. The 1967 letters written by the FSM to his mother and to the applicant refer to his treatment for multiple wounds arising out of one action that occurred on 13 May 1967 in the Mekong Delta region of Vietnam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063982C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063983C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. It was recommended that he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063984C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Chapter 16-5b of that regulation establishes policy and procedures, and provides authority for the voluntary separation of soldiers denied reenlistment due to a locally imposed bar to reenlistment. Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063985C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The character of the discharge is commensurate with the applicant's overall record of military service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063987C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The DD Form 214, issued to and signed by the applicant on the date of his separation, 1 September 1972, shows that he held the rank and pay grade of sergeant first class/E-7 (SFC/E-7) and Item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) confirms that on the date of his separation, he held and was serving in MOS 57G40...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063988C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063989C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Given that the applicant became a first lieutenant in 1990 and had served as a commissioned officer in the ARNG and Army Reserve since 1986 he knew, or should have known, that he would be considered for promotion during the time period of 1993 to 1994.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063994C070421
This document shows the unit, to which the applicant was assigned, was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation for actions during the period 24 August to 5 September 1969 by Department of the Army General Orders Number 32, dated 1973. The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant was wounded in action on 22 September 1969 and is entitled to award of the PH and his records should be corrected accordingly. The evidence of record also shows his entitlement to award of the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063995C070421
The applicant requests that his locally imposed bar to reenlistment be removed and that his Reentry Eligibility (RE) Code be changed from RE-4 to a more favorable RE code. Paragraph 16-5 applies to personnel denied reenlistment and provides that soldiers who receive DA imposed or locally imposed bars to reenlistment, and who perceive that they will be unable to overcome the bar may apply for immediate discharge. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063996C070421
There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal. The Board also noted that the applicant’s discharge document does not show entitlement to any unit awards. The Board also noted the applicant’s service personnel records were not present at the separation station when he was discharged from active duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064000C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant’s RE Code is appropriate considering the basis for his separation, and the Board finds no basis to correct the existing code. Contrary to the applicant’s contention, his RE Code is not a reflection on his honorable service, but rather merely reflects that he was not eligible to reenlist at the time of his separation from active duty because of a locally...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064002C070421
The Board considered the following evidence: The applicant’s military records show that she was retired under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 12, for sufficient service for retirement. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by changing the applicant’s DD Form 214, item 23 to show “Retirement,” instead of Discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064005C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. There is no evidence in available records that the applicant ever submitted an application for a hardship discharge. The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064006C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : His wife put him in debt and led to his discharge. On 11 January 1995, the applicant's commander initiated action to separate the applicant for misconduct (pattern of misconduct) under the provisions of chapter 14, Army Regulation (AR) 635-200.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064011C070421
The evidence of record shows that he is entitled to the Korean Service Medal with two bronze service stars and the United Nations Medal Service Medal based on award of the Korean Service Medal. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show these awards. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case for the individual concerned be corrected by showing in item 27 (Decorations and Awards) of his DD Form 214, dated 10 July 1952, that he was awarded the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064014C070421
On 24 March 1976, court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant for being AWOL from 25 March 1971 to 18 March 1976. On 19 May 1976, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service. There is no evidence in the applicant’s record that indicated he was suffering from PTSD.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064019C070421
The applicant’s commanding officer recommended to the separation authority that the applicant be discharged for misconduct and that he receive an under honorable conditions discharge. Paragraph 4-9 states in effect that a waiver is required for any applicant who was discharged for misconduct. However, paragraph 4-24 states in effect that a waiver cannot be granted for persons with prior service last discharged from any component of the Armed Forces for drug or alcohol abuse.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064021C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. He was discharged on 28 July 1971 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unsuitability, and issued a general discharge under honorable conditions. In view of the applicant's overall record for his period of service from 20 September 1969 to 28 July 1971, it does not appear that his general discharge was too severe.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064022C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064023C070421
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, correction of item 12b (Separation Date This Period) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty) to show 17 May 1993 instead of 4 January 1993; award of the Humanitarian Service Medal, two awards of the Army Achievement Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Parachute Badge (correctly known as the Parachutist Badge) and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar; correction of item 11 (Primary Specialty)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064024C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: __iw___ ___gw_ ____ ___rw____DENY APPLICATION
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064025C070421
The applicant states, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) does not show the PH he was authorized for being wounded in action in Korea on 21 September 1952. Thus, the Board concludes the applicant should be awarded the PH. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by awarding the individual concerned the Purple Heart for being wounded in action on 21 September 1952, while serving as a private first class in Korea; and by awarding him...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064026C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The character of the discharge was lenient considering the applicant's overall record of military service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064027C070421
On 31 July 1970, the applicant was discharged with a discharge UOTHC, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The Board is cognizant of the applicant’s Vietnam service and the fact that counseling and group sessions enabled...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064029C070421
The applicant requests reconsideration of his request that he be advanced on the retired list to the highest grade he satisfactorily held, i.e., pay grade E-6. The AGDRB determined he served satisfactorily in grade E-5 for the purpose of computation of retired pay. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064032C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. On 18 September 1967, the applicant was discharged, with an undesirable discharge under other than honorable conditions, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064034C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In regards to the accusation that she threatened DS B___, she believed she had been subjected to unfair and harsh treatment under DS B___’s supervision. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064039C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. His Record of Induction, DD Form 47,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064041C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Failure to file within 3 years may be...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064042C070421
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show entitlement to award of the Purple Heart (PH). The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant has been awarded the PH with 1 OLC, based on wounds received in action on 15 August 1943 and 20 November 1944. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was awarded the PH with 1 OLC, based on wounds received in action on 15 August 1943 and 20 November 1944.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064043C070421
Army Regulation (AR) 600-8-22 (Military Awards) sets forth Department of the Army criteria, policy and instructions concerning individual military awards, the Good Conduct Medal, service medals and service ribbons, combat and special skill badges and tabs, unit decorations, and trophies and similar devices awarded in recognition of accomplishments. The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show these awards as authorized awards because they were awarded to his unit after he had been discharged. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064048C070421
Evidence of record shows the applicant served in Korea from 14 December 1960 through 30 August 1962. Since he did not have an active Army status on or after 1 August 1981, he is not eligible for retroactive award of the Overseas Service Ribbon for his service Korea. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was awarded the National Defense Service Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064053C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064058C070421
His DD Form 214 also does not show award of the Good Conduct Medal or any unit awards. There are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing the individual concerned was awarded the Good Conduct Medal for the period 31 August 1967 through 29 August 1969, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064064C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064067C070421
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, two awards of the Purple Heart (correctly known as the Purple Heart (First Oak Leaf Cluster)), the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Automatic Rifle Bar, two bronze service stars to be affixed to his Vietnam Service Medal, the Meritorious Service Medal and the Vietnam Campaign Medal. There...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064071C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064074C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The applicant’s personnel records contain a letter, dated 1 November 1968, which states that the applicant escaped from confinement on 21 October 1968 and was returned to the Post Stockade on 30 October 1968.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064076C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. He was released from active duty and discharged as a Reserve of the Army and returned to the ARNG on 18 November 1976. The applicant has not presented and the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064080C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file. She believes that the “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell“ homosexual policy enacted by President Clinton should be applied retroactively. The applicant has not presented...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064083C070421
On 3 March 1998, the appropriate separation authority approved his discharge and indicated that the authority for his discharge would be Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-11 (Entry Level Separation) with a characterization of service of “uncharacterized.” On 10 March 1998, he was discharged with a characterization of service of uncharacterized under the above-cited regulation. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed Military Police training and was awarded MOS 95B and his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064087C070421
The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show that he was awarded the PH. His DD Form 214 also does not show award of the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) and there is no evidence that he was ever denied the award. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing to the individual concerned a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) to show award of the PH, the GCMDL, the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal, First...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064092C070421
He states he was wounded in action and his report of discharge (DD Form 214) does not list the Purple Heart. The awards listed on the applicant’s DD Form 214 include the Vietnam Service Medal w/1 Bronze Service Star, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, National Defense Service Medal and the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant’s DA Form 20 indicates he was wounded while assigned to Vietnam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064095C070421
At the time of the Board’s 19 July 2001 decision in this case (AR2001058580), it was the intent of the Board to make the FSM’s record as administratively correct as possible to provide equitable relief to the applicant in accordance with applicable laws. In view of the additional factors in this case, it would be appropriate to amend the Recommendation of the Board’s 19 July 2001 action to show the FSM changed his SBP coverage to former spouse coverage (full base amount) on 24 September...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064097C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064101C070421
The Army Reserve Personnel Command (AR-PERCOM), Military Personnel Actions Branch expressed the opinion that under the ROPMA unit officers selected by a mandatory board will have a promotion date and effective date no earlier than approval date of the board or the date of Senate confirmation (if required), provided they are assigned to a position in the next higher grade. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the...