Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064014C070421
Original file (2001064014C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION


         IN THE CASE OF:
        


         BOARD DATE: 21 March 2002
         DOCKET NUMBER: AR2001064014

         I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

Mr. Carl W. S. Chun Director
Mrs. Joyce A. Hall Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:

Mr. John N. Slone Chairperson
Ms. Linda D. Simmons Member
Mr. John T. Meixell Member

         The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

         The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

         The Board considered the following evidence:

         Exhibit A - Application for correction of military
records
         Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
         advisory opinion, if any)


APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his discharge under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) be upgraded to a general discharge (GD).

APPLICANT STATES: In effect, that due to his prior honorable service he is requesting a GD. He served the 6 months tours in Vietnam, prior to going absent without leave (AWOL) due to Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). He is still having flash backs and has trouble associating with people.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show:

The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 9 May 1968.
He completed the required training and was awarded military occupational specialty 13B4P (Field Artillery Crewman). On 27 January 1969, the applicant was honorably discharged and immediately reenlisted on 28 January 1969 for
3 years. His services were continuous through reenlistments. The highest pay grade he achieved was pay grade E-5.

The applicant arrived in the RVN on or about 5 June 1969. He was assigned to
Battery C, 3rd Battalion, 319th Artillery, 173rd Airborne Brigade, Vietnam.

On 22 August 1969, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice for dereliction of duty. His imposed punishment was a forfeiture of $40.00 pay and a reduction to pay grade E-3 (suspended for 1 month).

The applicant departed the RVN on or about 27 November 1970. On 25 March 1971, the applicant was reported for being AWOL from the United States Army Overseas Replacement Station, Oakland, California. He was dropped from the rolls on 28 April 1971.

On 18 March 1976, the applicant was apprehended by Federal authorities and confined to Franklin County Jail in Russellville, Alabama. On 22 March 1976, the applicant was released and placed in military control at Fort McClellan, Alabama. On 24 March 1976, the applicant was transferred to the United States Army Personnel Control Facility, Fort Campbell, Kentucky.

On 24 March 1976, court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant for being AWOL from 25 March 1971 to 18 March 1976.

On 26 March 1976, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested a discharge under the provision of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The applicant was advised of the effects of a discharge under other than honorable conditions and that he might be deprived of many or all Army and Veterans Administration benefits. He was afforded the opportunity to submit statements in his own behalf. He stated, in effect, that he wanted out of the Army. His family would suffer financially if he did not get out. His bills total over $300.00 each month and he has a mortgage and car payments to make. He felt if he stayed in the service he would lose everything.

On 31 March 1976, a physical evaluation found the applicant fit for retention.

On 15 April 1976, the appropriate authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed the issuance of a discharge UOTHC. On 19 May 1976, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service. He completed
3 years and 14 days of creditable active service and had 1824 days of lost time.

Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

2. There is no evidence in the applicant’s record that indicated he was suffering from PTSD. Nor has the applicant submitted any evidence to support his allegation of PTSD. In fact the statement that the applicant submitted in his own behalf, stated that his reason for going AWOL was due to financial obligations to his family.

3. The applicant’s voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations. There is no indication that the request was made under coercion or duress.

4. The type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate considering all the facts of the case.

5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

_______ ________ ________ GRANT

________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__jns___ __lds___ __jtm___ DENY APPLICATION



                  Carl W. S. Chun
                  Director, Army Board for Correction
of Military Records




INDEX

CASE ID AR2001064014
SUFFIX
RECON
DATE BOARDED 20020321
TYPE OF DISCHARGE UD
DATE OF DISCHARGE 19760519
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR635-200, Chapter 10
DISCHARGE REASON A70.00
BOARD DECISION DENY
REVIEW AUTHORITY
ISSUES 1. 144.7000
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080002C070215

    Original file (2002080002C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show he was inducted on 1 August 1968, as a field artilleryman. On 22 March 1971, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. The evidence of record shows that he was attached pending approval/disapproval of his request for a hardship discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057151C070420

    Original file (2001057151C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The Board considered the following evidence: The ADRB convened on 30 March 1983; however, neither the applicant nor his legal counsel appeared.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076496C070215

    Original file (2002076496C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: That the deceased former service member’s (FSM’s) undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. However, at the time of the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059206C070421

    Original file (2001059206C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Army policy states that although an honorable or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007788C080407

    Original file (20070007788C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests that the applicant's UD be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD); and that the applicant be awarded the Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR) and National Defense Service Medal (NDSM). On 20 November 1973, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB), after carefully considering the applicant's military records and all other available evidence, determined the applicant was properly discharged and as a result denied the applicant's request for an upgrade of his discharge. Counsel's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079813C070215

    Original file (2002079813C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 23 December 1971, the applicant was discharged accordingly.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052362C070420

    Original file (2001052362C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was honorably discharged from this period of service on 12 January 1968. The applicant was transferred from Fort Campbell to Fort Bragg, North Carolina where he served as a vehicle driver in the 82 nd Airborne Division until he was honorably discharged on 12 January 1968 in pay grade E-5. On 22 January 1970, while he was assigned to Fort Bragg, the applicant reenlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years in pay grade E-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076484C070215

    Original file (2002076484C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The fact his prior service was good does not warrant granting the relief requested for his last period of service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014984

    Original file (20110014984.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The record does include a properly-constituted DD Form 214 that shows the applicant was discharged for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations). There is no evidence of record showing the applicant suffered from PTSD or any other medical or mental condition that contributed to the misconduct that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074565C070403

    Original file (2002074565C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: On 26 March 1980, the Army Discharge Review Board determined the applicant’s discharge had been proper and equitable and it denied his request for an upgrade to his discharge. Carl W. S. Chun Director, Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsINDEXCASE IDAR2002077311SUFFIXRECONYYYYMMDDDATE BOARDED2003/01/14TYPE OF DISCHARGEUD BCD, DD, UNCHAR)DATE OF DISCHARGE19720915DISCHARGE AUTHORITYAR635-200 .