ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060365C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Carl W. S. Chun Director, Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsINDEXCASE IDAR2001060365SUFFIXRECONYYYYMMDDDATE BOARDED20011120TYPE OF DISCHARGE(HD)DATE OF DISCHARGE19690717DISCHARGE...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060366C070421
APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he did not cancel his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage but instead changed it to former spouse coverage. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060368C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. A military medical doctor gave the applicant a physical examination and determined, according to regulation and medical findings, that the applicant was not medically qualified for further retention in the military service. Additionally, since the asthma condition, which resulted in the applicant being medically unfit for retention, was EPTS and not incurred in the line...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060369C070421
The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show the rank of sergeant first class (SFC) as the highest rank he held while on active duty, his correct unit of assignment, and all awards and decorations to which he is entitled. While the Board wishes to congratulate the applicant on his outstanding World War II service, it finds the available evidence confirms only that he held the rank of TEC 5 on the date of his separation and that the highest rank he held...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060370C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Notwithstanding the applicant’s contention that he is unable to reenter the military with a RE code “4”; he has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that the reenlistment code issued to him was administratively incorrect, or in error or...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060372C070421
As with all personal decorations, to support awarding the BSM and adding it to a member’s service record, a formal recommendation must have been made for the award, it must have been approved by the proper authority, and the award must have been announced in orders. The Board notes the applicant’s contention that he is entitled to the PH and the BSM. Lacking a specific disqualifying action from any of his unit commanders, the Board finds the evidence of record confirms that the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060374C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. There is no evidence of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060375C070421
In support of his application, he submits a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Evidence of record shows the applicant completed training in MOS 67N; therefore, he is entitled to award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge and correction of his records to show this badge. Evidence of record shows the applicant is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; therefore, he is entitled to correction...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060376C070421
The Board considered the following evidence: Therefore, based on his participation in 3 campaigns while serving in the ETO, the Board concludes that the applicant’s record should be corrected to show he earned 3 bronze service stars for his European-African-Middle Eastern Service Medal. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the PH; the European-African-Middle Eastern Service Medal, with 3 bronze...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060378C070421
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Accordingly, it would be in the interest of justice to award him the NDSM at this time and to correct his records accordingly.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060381C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states that he was awarded the PH, but it was never entered on his DD Form 214. As such, the Board must conclude that the PH was awarded to the applicant but the orders were never entered into his records, which resulted in the decoration not being included on his DD Form 214.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060382C070421
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his records be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart (PH). EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show these awards as authorized awards because they were awarded to his unit after he had been discharged.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060383C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his Report of Separation, DD Form 214, be amended to add the Army Good Conduct Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, and, apparently, the Bronze Star Medal. Since it appears the applicant was not recommended for award of the Bronze Star Medal, the Board finds no inequity in not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060384C070421
The applicant’s military records show that he entered active duty on 30 December 1948. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 shows that the 162d Aviation Company was awarded the Valorous Unit Award for the period 4 through 20 November 1966, the Meritorious Unit Citation for the period 1 January through 31 December 1967, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm for the period 1 March 1966 through 26 March 1967, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060388C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060389C070421
EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show any entry in item 40 (Wounds) or list the Purple Heart in item 41 (Awards and Decorations). There is no evidence nor has the applicant presented any evidence in support of his allegation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060390C070421
The applicant states that she was a SGT, but her DD Form 256A and her discharge order show her rank as specialist (SPC). In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected, but only as recommended below. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the discharge orders of the individual concerned to show that she was separated as a SGT, not a SPC.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060391C070421
The applicant states that his DD Form 214 does not show that he was awarded the Purple Heart three times and the CIB. The applicant records do not reflect the dates that he served as an 11B in a combat unit in Vietnam, requirements for award of the CIB. b. showing that he was awarded the Good Conduct Medal for the period of 29 June 1967 to 10 February 1969.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060392C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that while he was pending retirement he was charged with being absent without leave (AWOL), was administratively separated with a general, under honorable conditions discharge (GD), and lost his entitlement to retirement benefits. He was formally charged with being AWOL and processed out of the Army without retirement benefits.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060394C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: The separation document confirms that the applicant was discharged for the good of the service/in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060395C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060400C070421
The applicant requests, in effect, removal of his second non-selection for promotion to captain. The applicant was erroneously considered for promotion to captain by the 1998 RCSB. The applicant’s records clearly show he was discharged from the IDARNG and the Reserve before the promotion board convened.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060401C070421
The applicant's statement indicates that his home of record (HOR) is San Antonio, Texas; however, he is a German National and he was forced to pay $900.00 for travel to Germany for both his wife and himself after he was discharged. A member traveling to a different location is entitled to allowances for travel performed up to the amount payable for travel from the last permanent duty station to the HOR or PLEAD, whichever is greater. That all of the Department of the Army records related...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060407C070421
Paragraph 3-13 outlines the criteria for the award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) and it states, in pertinent part, that the award is authorized in time of war for heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service. In addition, given that the record is void of any derogatory information or a specific unit commander’s disqualifying recommendation for award of the AGCM, the Board concludes that the applicant is entitled to the first award of the AGCM for his qualifying period of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060408C070421
The applicant’s Record of Military Processing, DD Form 1966/4, indicates that she renegotiated her contract at the Reception Station from training in MOS 68D to training in MOS 54B and from a 6-year commitment to a 2-year commitment. The evidence of record shows the applicant originally enlisted for 6 years and 00 weeks but renegotiated her contract to change her training option and enlistment commitment. That the applicant’s DD Form 4/1 dated 31 May 2001, item 8a be corrected to show she...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060411C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant requests...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060421C070421
The Board considered the following evidence: By dividing 11 months (330 days) by 43 days, the Board can reasonably conclude the applicant was entitled to a total of seven AM’s. Since the applicant’s military records do not contain any evidence or indication of anything but exemplary service, and the applicant was awarded decorations for both heroism and wounds sustained in combat, it is apparent that his commander’s failure to award him the GCM was also an oversight.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060422C070421
In 1989, the FSM and the applicant divorced. The Board concludes that it would be appropriate to correct his records to show that he elected former spouse coverage on 1 January 1990, within one year of his divorce. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the FSM changed his SBP election from spouse to former spouse coverage on 1 January 1990 and that his request was received and processed by the appropriate office in a timely manner.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060423C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 2 March 1961, he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years and training as an aircraft mechanic. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application or the evidence of record, that he was recommended for or was awarded the DFC or the “V” device for an award of the Air Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060424C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: Normally, a soldier will be discharged or REFRAD on the date he or she completes the period for which enlisted or ordered to active duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060429C070421
Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: In accordance with Army Regulation 40-501, such a condition does not render an individual unfit because of physical disability but may be the basis...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060432C070421
The applicant requests that Block 33 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Report of Separation and Honorable Discharge) be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart and the World War II Victory Medal. The applicant states that the Purple Heart was left off of his WD AGO 53-55. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected, but only as recommended below.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060434C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060436C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On or about 2 September 1968, the company commander initiated action to separate the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unfitness. On 21 November 1968, the applicant was discharged, with a discharge UOTHC, in pay grade E-1 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unfitness.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060437C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Item 29 on the applicant's DD Form 214 show that on 9 July 1953, he was wounded as a result of action with enemy forces while assigned to Korea. He was evacuated to the 25 th Station
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060438C070421
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation and the Combat Engineer Badge. The applicant states that he is entitled to these awards for his service with his engineer unit in Vietnam. The pamphlet also shows that the applicant was assigned to a unit during the time that it was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, first class.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060439C070421
The VA records reflect that the applicant’s service medical records showed multiple fragment wounds sustained in Vietnam. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. The applicant is entitled to several other awards that are not listed on his DD Form 214, which include: three bronze service stars for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Presidential...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060440C070421
In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060443C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. This regulation establishes CCF as the agency responsible for adjudicating records to determine if a security clearances should be granted. In the opinion of the Board, the action taken by CCF to deny the applicant’s security clearance was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulation based on the derogatory information contained in his record.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060444C070421
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show he was promoted to captain prior to his separation. It provided that in order for an officer to have been promoted to captain, that officer must have been recommended by his commander as well as have served successfully in the position of a captain for at least three months. Although the applicant’s military records are not available, it appears from the available evidence that he met the eligibility requirements for promotion to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060445C070421
The Board considered the following evidence: The applicant states he was awarded the AM while assigned to Vietnam. United States Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided, in pertinent part, guidelines for award of the Air Medal (AM).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060446C070421
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 1 June 1994, the applicant’s request for an upgrade to his discharge was denied by the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) based on their finding that his discharge was both proper and equitable. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060447C070421
In support of his application, he submits the letter, dated 22 July 1953, from his platoon leader and a Letter of Commendation, dated 18 July 1953. However, there is no evidence in the applicant’s personnel service records which shows he was recommended for or awarded the Army Commendation Medal by his chain of command. Evidence of record shows the applicant received a Letter of Commendation, dated 18 July 1953, from a platoon leader of the 224th Infantry Regiment.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060448C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060466C070421
The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 1 December 1965 for a period of 2 years. For Vietnam service, one OSB is authorized for each period of 6 months' active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 15 September 1966 to 6 May 1967. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), in pertinent part, authorizes award of a bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed in Appendix B of this...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060468C070421
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL) is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record confirms the applicant’s honorable service in the American Theater and overseas from 26 July 1945 to 3 March 1947 entitles him to award of the ACM and the GCMDL. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060476C070421
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Thereafter, he was recommended for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 9, as a drug abuse rehabilitation failure. That NJP imposed upon the applicant on the date indicated was based solely on a positive drug urinalysis that cannot be scientifically or legally supported for use in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060477C070421
The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. Also on file is a military record finding report from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), dated 1 August 2001. The Board also finds the available evidence confirms that the applicant served with the 507 th Parachute Infantry Regiment in the ETO and that the unit listed in his separation document was likely a transitional unit to which he was assigned for movement and processing prior to his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060478C070421
DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: The evidence of record confirms that the applicant’s conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations in effect at the time and that his trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offenses with which he was charged. Carl W. S. Chun Director, Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060485C070421
The applicant states, in effect, that notwithstanding the original decision of the Board to deny his request for a second POW medal, a review of the correspondence and his request for reconsideration with his presentation of new evidence will substantiate his entitlement to this award and justify his resubmission. The applicant provided the enclosed third party statement from an individual whom he claims was the replacement unit commander that debriefed him upon his return to military...