| Mr. Carl W. S. Chun | Director | |
| Mrs. Nancy Amos | Analyst |
| Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr. | Chairperson | |
| Ms. Regan K. Smith | Member | |
| Mr. Donald P. Hupman, Jr. | Member |
APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, DD Form 214, be corrected to show he was medically retired.
APPLICANT STATES: That he was on convalescent leave at the time of his discharge recovering from an attack of diverticulitis. He was never advised of his rights to a medical retirement or given due process. The authority and reason for discharge is shown as paragraph 8-26I, National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200. This regulation is talking about a bar to reenlistment due to overweight, Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) failure, or a positive urinalysis. He had failed a part of the APFT but he was on a medical profile during the period the APFT re-test was an issue.
EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records are not available. Information contained herein was obtained from alternate sources.
The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard on 27 May 1983. He entered active duty apparently in an active guard/reserve (AGR) status on 16 May 1985.
The applicant was hospitalized from 7 – 14 May 1998 with a discharge diagnosis of acute diverticulitis with probable localized contained small perforation.
On 26 May 1998, the applicant was released from active duty (REFRAD) upon the completion of his required active service. The separation authorities listed on his DD Form 214 were Army Regulation 635-200 and NGR 600-5.
On 26 May 1998, the applicant was discharged from the Army National Guard and as a Reserve of the Army. The Report of Separation, NGB Form 22, shows the separation authority and reason for discharge as NGR 600-200, paragraph 8-26i.
A medical document dated 26 June 2000 indicates that the applicant was being followed for bipolar disorder and he reported that he was treated in service for depression.
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 4 states that a soldier enlisted or ordered to active duty normally will be discharged or REFRAD on the date he or she completes the period for which enlisted or ordered to active duty.
NGR 600-200, paragraph 8-26i refers to Army Regulation 135-178 (Reserve Component Enlisted Separations), chapter 11. Chapter 11 discusses separations for expiration of service obligation or expiration of term of service which includes soldiers who are barred from reenlistment or flagged or otherwise not eligible for reenlistment.
NGR 600-5 prescribes policies and procedures for the management of Army National Guard soldiers in the AGR Program who serve on Full-Time National Guard Duty.
Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation of physical fitness of soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. The regulation defines “physically unfit” as unfitness due to physical disability. The unfitness is of such a degree that a soldier is unable to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating in such a way as to reasonably fulfill the purposes of his employment on active duty. It states that the mere presence of an impairment does not, of itself, justify a finding of unfitness because of physical disability. To ensure all soldiers are physically qualified to perform their duties in a reasonable manner, medical retention qualification standards have been established in Army Regulation 40-501, chapter 3. These guidelines are used to refer soldiers to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB).
Army Regulation 40-501 governs medical fitness standards for enlistment, retention, and separation. Paragraph 3-5 lists the causes for referral to an MEB for abdominal and gastrointestinal defects and diseases. Diverticulitis is not listed as a cause for referral to an MEB. Paragraph 3-32 lists the causes for referral to an MEB for affective disorders (mood disorders). It states that the causes for referral to an MEB are persistence or recurrence of symptoms sufficient to require extended or recurrent hospitalization, necessity for limitations of duty or duty in protected environment or resulting in interference with effective military performance.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition classifies depression and bipolar disorders as mood disorders.
DISCUSSION: Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:
1. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
2. Neither diverticulitis nor depression (or bipolar disorder) disqualify a soldier from retention in the service. There is no evidence to show the applicant’s depression resulted in extended or recurrent hospitalization for treatment while on active duty or that it prevented him from effectively performing his military duties. Therefore, he was not eligible for referral to an MEB or a medical separation.
3. Normally, a soldier will be discharged or REFRAD on the date he or she completes the period for which enlisted or ordered to active duty. Reenlistment is a privilege, not a right. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, the Board presumes that the applicant was properly REFRAD and separated by the Army National Guard upon the completion of his expiration term of service.
4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.
DETERMINATION: The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__rvo___ __rks___ __dph___ DENY APPLICATION
| CASE ID | AR2001060424 |
| SUFFIX | |
| RECON | |
| DATE BOARDED | 20011016 |
| TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
| DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
| DISCHARGE REASON | |
| BOARD DECISION | (DENY) |
| REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
| ISSUES 1. | 108.00 |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. |
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020596
The applicant had multiple medical conditions (hypertension, diverticulitis, and anxiety disorder) that were diagnosed while he was on active duty in support of OIF during the period 9 November 2004 to 27 November 2005, and he was granted VA compensation for these conditions within 1 year of his release from active duty. a. Paragraph 6-35l states to refer to Army Regulation 135-178 (Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 15, for discharge on the basis of a Soldier being medically...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002588
Chapter 3 lists the various medical conditions and physical defects which, if incurred or aggravated by an Army National Guard Soldier during an active duty period, may render a Soldier unfit for further military service and require referral to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) and further referral to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) for determination of fitness or unfitness. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical condition, although not considered medically...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070718C070402
On 22 September 2000 the applicant’s squad leader counseled him concerning his performance, stating that he had not improved since being diagnosed with bipolar disorder, and that it would be in his and the Army’s best interest that he be separated because of his personality disorder. On 23 October 2000 the applicant’s commanding officer notified the applicant that he was initiating action to separate him from the Army for a personality disorder under the provisions of Army Regulation...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00120
The bipolar disorder II and the meniscus tear conditions, characterized as “bipolar type II disorder” and “non-displaced tear, lateral meniscus, right knee,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.The MEB also identified and forwarded three other conditions (see rating chart below) for PEB adjudication.The PEB adjudicated “bipolar disorder type II”and “non-displaced meniscus tear, lateral, right knee”as unfitting, rated 10% and 0%.The remaining conditions were...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006380
Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his office, grade, rank, or rating. Once a determination of physical unfitness is made, the Physical Evaluation Board rates all disabilities using the VA Schedule of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004190C070205
The PA stated that the applicant was currently undergoing a MEB by the Army to determine his fitness for duty status. Evidence of record shows that the applicant experienced medical issues as early as 1982 when he attempted suicide. Evidence of record shows that the applicant's medical condition did not prevent him from performing his military duties.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022475
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show he was medically retired. His discharge contradicts Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), which states the PEB is the sole body within the Army that can determine a Soldier's fitness. This form shows a further review was requested because the applicant was using Zoloft.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009918
On 3 August 1995, an informal PEB convened and found the applicant's condition prevented her from performing the duties required of her grade and military specialty and determined that she was physically unfit due to Major Depression, recurrent, treated, partially improved, manifested by depressed mood, tearfulness, insomnia, and suicidal ideation. The PEB considered her other conditions but found them not to be unfitting and therefore not rated. The PEB rated her Major Depression...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002888
He would like the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to consider his case since the AFBCMR is sticking with their decision that his disabilities were caused while on active duty in the Army and must be considered by the Army. g. A letter from the Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA), dated 6 August 2013, wherein he was advised that if he would like the ABCMR to review his discharge from the Army active service (7 April 1993 through 28 February 2006) and change it to a medical...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012584
He provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 March 2012 * DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) for the period ending 31 March 2012 * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter), dated 26 February 2009 * CAARNG memorandum, dated 1 August 2011, subject: Non-Selection for Retention under the Provisions of National Guard Regulation 635-102 (Officers and Warrant Officers Selective Retention) * DA Form...