AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01497
The Board finds no impropriety in the characterization of applicant's discharge. It appears that responsible officials applied appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and we do not find persuasive evidence that pertinent regulations were violated or that applicant was not afforded all the rights to which entitled at the time of discharge. Accordingly, we find that corrective action is appropriate on the basis of clemency and recommend the records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01499
On 7 March 1977, after consulting with counsel, the applicant filed her request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Air Force Manual 39-12, Chapter 2, Section F. She indicated that if her request for discharge was approved, she understood it may result in her receiving a UOTHC discharge. On 23 March 1978 and 8 December 1980, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicants request to upgrade her discharge. Furthermore,...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01505
The BCMR Medical Consultant states that no evidence is presented to show the applicant was unable to reasonably perform his military duties, by reason of an illness or injury; or that he had a medical condition that posed a safety or mission risk. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01507
On 31 July 2007, the commander notified the member that he was being discharged from the ANG under the provisions of AFI 36-3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members, Substandard (Unsatisfactory) Performance. On 31 July 2007, the applicant was honorably discharged from the MI ANG because he failed his end-of-course examination for his CDC twice. ___________________________________________________________ _____ The following members of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01511
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01511 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal for a service-connected wound in Nadzab, New Guinea. As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01514
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE defers to the recommendation of AFLOA/JAJM regarding the Article 15 and restoration of the applicants former rank of master sergeant. A complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01515
INDEX CODE: 100.00 AFBCMR BC-2010-01515 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01516
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Taiwan from 1957 1959. In accordance with the DoD 1348.33-M, C6.5.1.1., Personnel Eligible, states the AFEM may be awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who after 1 July 1958: a. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-01516 in Executive Session on 10 November...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01517
INDEX CODE: 100.00 AFBCMR BC-2010-01517 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01529 ADDENDUM
In an earlier finding, the Board determined there was insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action. After thoroughly reviewing the additional documentation submitted in support of this appeal and the evidence of record, we are not persuaded that his inability to qualify for ACP constitutes an error or an injustice. The requirement that original orders be cut for sufficient time to qualify for ACP participation without having to amend or cobble additional sets of orders to meet...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01535
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01535 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded. c. He exhibited disorderly conduct, for this misconduct he received an Article 15. We have considered the available evidence of record; however, considering his overall record of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01536 ADDENDUM
The Board also determined the evidence presented by the applicant relative to his activities since leaving the service was not sufficient to upgrade his discharge in the interest of justice on the basis of clemency. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants original request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F. By application, dated 30 Jan 12 and 6 Feb 12, the applicant requests reconsideration,...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01540
____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His Sleep Apnea with CPAP was not included in the original package that went before the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB)/Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The complete APFC/DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. ____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant does not recall waiving his option for an FPEB, but believes if he did it was directly...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01541
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force effective 23 July 1962 in the grade of airman basic (E-1). DPSIDRA indicates the applicant has not provided a recommendation from someone within his chain of command who has firsthand knowledge of the incident, proposed citation, chain of command endorsements, or eyewitness statements. The complete DPSIDRA evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01542
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01542 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: The majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01543
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01543 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The decedent be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: The majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01546
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01546 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, impaired hearing and tinnitus be assessed as combat-related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. This number is far more generous than the 40 Hz the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01547
On 24 July 2000, the commander notified the applicant that he was recommending him for discharge for erroneous enlistment under the authority of Air Force Personnel Directive 36-32 and Air Force Instruction 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section C, Defective Enlistments, paragraph 5.14 under Basis for Erroneous Enlistment. The applicant did not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing; nor, did he provide any facts warranting a change to his...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01548
He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The DPSIDR complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 29 Oct 10 for review and response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01549
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01549 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be promoted to the grade of technical sergeant (TSgt/E-6) and that he be entitled to the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). DPSOE notes that they were unable to verify whether the applicant was considered or selected for promotion to TSgt because...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01551
DPSIDEP states the applicant did not file an appeal through the Evaluation Reports and Appeals Board (ERAB) under the provisions of Air Force Instruction 36- 2401, Correcting Officer and Enlisted Evaluation Reports; however, the ERAB reviewed the applicants request and recommended denial as they were not convinced the contested report was inaccurate or unjust. Since the EPR is not completed in accordance with Air Force Instruction 36-2406 and the applicant has failed to provide the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01552
INDEX CODE: 100.00 AFBCMR BC-2010-01552 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01555
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01555 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM). The complete HQ AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01556
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01556 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His officer performance report (OPR) rendered for the period from 3 Dec 06 2 Dec 07 be removed from his record. ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) and...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01559
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01559 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) debt be stopped and removed from the time he was selected as a Military Training Leader (MTL). He found out that the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) had sent him a letter; however,...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01562
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01562 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code and separation code be changed to allow him to reenter the military. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. He has not used any...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01566
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01566 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His debt in the amount of $2826.17 be forgiven. At the time of his discharge, he had fulfilled 37 months of a 72 month contract with an enlistment bonus entitlement of $15000.00. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Jul 10.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01568
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01568 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty, be changed from Erroneous Entry (Other) to Medical. On 17 Jul 10, her commander notified her that he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01569
INDEX CODE: 100.00 AFBCMR BC-2010-01569 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01576
Neither of these periods of time constitutes a break in service, based on applicable Air Force and DoD directives. A1K notes, IAW AFI 36-2604, Service Dates and Dates of Rank, para 4.6 and DoD Financial Management Regulation (DoDFMR) 7000.14-R, Military Pay Policy and Procedures Active Duty and Reserve Pay, an assignment to the Inactive Reserve or Retired Reserve is not considered a break in military service because the member is assigned to a military status and as such, is subject to...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01577
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The HHG shipment of his PBP&E was not annotated properly on his Descriptive Inventories Sheet, dated 6 Jun 07. JPPA-ECAFs adjudication section reviewed the case file and determined the debt was correct, advising that previous or subsequent shipment weights could not be used in determining the excess cost for the shipment in question. The applicant is requesting the 22 items in his HHG...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01578
DPSOE further notes even if the performance report were removed from his records, he would still be ineligible for promotion to A1C on 16 Aug 09, as he was no longer on active duty in the Air Force. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our decision that the applicant has failed to sustain his...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01585
In accordance with the 8 Dec 06 SAF/AA memo, Return to Active Duty of Air Reserve Component (ARC) Members Unable to Perform Military Duties, members are eligible for active duty orders for periods they are unable to perform military duty as a result of a service connected condition. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits C and...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01586
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01586 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) rendered for the period 2 Jan 09 through 1 Jan 10, Section III, Block 2, Performance Assessment, Standards, Conduct, Character & Military Bearing, be changed to match the wording on his Letter of Reprimand...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01587
Everyone received a medal but him. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. Additionally, the applicant cannot recommend himself for entitlement to a decoration.
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01594
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01594 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 6H (Drug Abuse) be changed to a 1 so she can reenlist. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01597
Members of the Board, considered this application on 4 June 2010. Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, AFPC/DPSOO/ dtd 5 May 2010 AFBCMR BC-2010-01597 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01603
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01603 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her former spouses DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to show that he was awarded: a. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01606
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01606 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. The Air Force never provided him with the appropriate diagnosis, education or treatment. On 1 October 1985, the discharge authority determined that a general discharge was...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01616
On 20 May 99, the applicant appeared before the AFDRB requesting an upgrade of his discharge and a change of his RE code. Based on a review of his record and the evidence provided, we do not find that a basis exists to provide him with a further change in his RE code or narrative reason. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2010-01616 in Executive Session on 15 February 2011, under the provisions of...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01619
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010- 01619 INDEX CODE: A29.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________ _____ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Entry Level Separation (ELS) be upgraded to an Honorable Discharge. ___________________________________________________________ _____ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01633
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01633 INDEX CODE: 111.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The AF Forms 707, Field Grade Officer Effectiveness Reports (OERs), rendered on him as a major be reviewed and he receive a direct promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel with a date of rank retroactive to the date he was first...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01638
On 28 Jul 04, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for Erroneous Enlistment. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01640
We considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient for us to recommend granting the relief sought on that basis. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to upgrade the applicants UOTHC discharge. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-01640 in Executive Session on 7 Dec 10,...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01645
The Air Force Special Operations Command SJA recommended the applicant be discharged in lieu of trial and directed that he be separated with a, general (under honorable conditions), or UOTHC discharge. A Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) considered the applicants case based on his diagnosis of PTSD and recommended the applicants case be referred to the IPEB. On 18 Mar 10, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the applicants request for an upgrade of his UOTHC discharge to...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01650
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01650 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-01650 in Executive Session on 26 Jan 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member ,...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01654
INDEX CODE: 100.00 AFBCMR BC-2010-01654 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board, Ms. Glenda H. Scheiner, Mr. Jay A. Aragon, and Ms. Cheri L. Cannon, considered this...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01668
The applicant was serving on active duty orders for more than 30 days, and the Air Force was required by law to continue him on active duty orders. The applicant served on active duty continuously from 2004 until 9 Oct 09, the date of his removal from active duty. The Counsel's complete response is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends granting the applicant relief by changing...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01669
AFBCMR BC-2010-01669 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01670
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01670 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His status be changed from non-combat related to combat related. DPSD states that a preponderance of evidence reflects that no error or injustice occurred during the disability process or at the time his of retirement. Upon review of the narrative...