RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01562
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reentry (RE) code and separation code be changed to allow him
to reenter the military.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He believes he was misdiagnosed by the Air Force as having
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). ADHD is
something you develop early in life and would still affect a
person throughout their life. However, he did well in high
school, graduating with honors and received the Presidential
Academic Excellence Award. While attending technical school he
drank 3-4 energy drinks to stay awake in class and failed two
academic tests. Because he drank these drinks, he became
jittery; unfocused, and wired. After he failed these tests, he
was referred to the mental health clinic for an evaluation. It
was determined he had severe ADHD and was recommended for
discharge. Upon returning home, he spoke with a recruiter about
reenlisting; however, the recruiter told him he would have to be
reevaluated and seek proper treatment, if needed. After a
civilian doctor tested him, the tests results did not show any
signs of him having ADHD. The test results stated that the
original diagnosis was likely due to caffeine. As such, he
believes his discharge was invalid. He has held and maintained
two jobs over the past four years; at times working both jobs in
the same day.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal
statement, a copy of a letter from his supervisor, excerpts of
his civilian medical records, excerpts from his master personnel
records, and a copy of his congressional request.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 19 May 09 in
the grade of airman first class (E-3). He received an honorable
discharge on 17 Dec 09 after serving 6 months and 29 days on
active duty.
On 21 Apr 10, the applicant sent a letter to his Congressman
requesting assistance in changing his RE code.
Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the BCMR Medical Consultant.
Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this
Record of Proceedings.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. The Medical
Consultant states the applicant was prescribed at least a single
daily dosage of medication, which he elected to discontinue and
replaced it with his own treatment strategy of high-energy
drinks. This would lead one to believe that the applicant has
observed disorder symptoms preceding the caffeine usage. The
applicant has been discharged from the Air Force for
26 cumulative months. The Medical Consultant is unaware of any
post-service education pursuits or whether he has been further
prescribed medications for a cumulative period of 24 months. The
applicant was a member of the service and did not complete the
Service-specific training period although he was prescribed
medication for ADHD. Therefore, the Medical Consultant struggles
with returning him to duty so soon after leaving military
service, during a period in which he did not follow his doctors
recommended treatment; his commanders orders to follow-up, and
he disclosed difficulty adjusting to military life.
Nevertheless, the Medical Consultant opines the applicants
character of service of Mental Disorder overstates his
condition and ADHD does not fall under Mental Disorders.
Therefore, the Medical Consultant recommends changing it to
Secretarial Authority. However, the applicant has not met the
burden of proof of an error or injustice that warrants a change
of his RE code.
The BCMR Medical Consultants complete evaluation is at Exhibit
C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant responded by requesting his reason for separation
be changed to Secretarial Authority because he feels he has made
a convincing argument that his RE code should be changed to
something that will allow him to reenlist into at least a Reserve
Component. His doctors statement shows that he did not have
ADHD, at least from birth to 18 years of age. He believes the
Air Force physicians did not accomplish appropriate ADHD testing.
When testing for ADHD the person must have had at least 6 hours
of sleep. Other information must be considered when diagnosing
ADHD, such as data on ones developmental, educational,
behavioral functioning, third-party observation (e.g., parent or
teacher reports), and additional testing that rules out other
mental health problems (e.g., depression and anxiety) as causes
for the attention and impulsive difficulties; none of this was
accomplished when they diagnosed him with ADHD. He notes the
Medical Consultants advisory points out he had a hard time
adjusting to military life. However, the only way that could
have been misinterpreted is when he said Im not happy with
working all night, sleeping during the day and just being sent
around to appointments in his off duty time for months on end is
insane and the comment was just a personal comment and cant be
held to me as a personal label. He does not believe his family
problems should be held against him as a reason for not being
able join the Armed Forces again; his family problems are under
control. He believes plenty of time has gone by since he was
discharged. He also believes his discharge was based on false
accusations and false labels of having ADHD. As for his post-
service education pursuits, he provides a transcript from UNCG
with a 3.5 grade point average that proves he can test well,
especially in a condensed 5-week semester during the summer while
maintaining a part-time job. He has not used any prescribed
drugs for ADHD because he does not have ADHD. He hopes his
request, along with the supporting documentation, will be looked
at based on what actually applies to him that will give him a
better chance at getting his RE code and reason for separation
changed.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends approval. In an Addendum
advisory, the Medical Consultant states he recommends changing
the applicants narrative reason for separation to Secretarial
Authority. The Medical Consultant did not originally recommend a
change in RE code largely based upon the relative short period of
time since the applicants discharge, notwithstanding the
potentially doubtful diagnosis he received. However, although
the applicant did not provide a more detailed mental health
evaluation, the Medical Consultant does not wish to hinder his
opportunity to re-apply for entry into the military, with a
possible waiver if required by AETC/SGP. Even if the applicants
RE code is changed, his entry into the military will ultimately
be determined by the Military Entrance processing Station
officials and most likely require the same or additional medical
documentation as presented in this forum.
The BCMR Medical Consultants evaluation is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the BCMR Medical Consultants evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant on 6 May 2011 for review and comment within 30
days. As of this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an injustice. After reviewing the
evidence of record, it appears the RE code assigned to the
applicant, at the time, was technically correct and in accordance
with regulation. However, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the BCMR Medical Consultant and adopt his
rationale expressed in his Addendum advisory as the basis for our
decision that the applicants separation (SPD) code with
corresponding narrative reason be changed to Secretarial
Authority and the RE code be changed to 3K. Whether or not
he is successful in rejoining the military will depend on the
needs of the respective military services at the time and our
recommendation in no way guarantees he will be allowed to serve
in the military again; this will simply afford him the
opportunity to apply for a waiver to enlist in the armed
services. Therefore, we recommend that his records be corrected
as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on December 17,
2009 he was honorably separated under the provisions of AFI 36-
3208, paragraph 1.2 (Secretarial Authority) with a separation
code of JFF and a reentry code (RE) code of 3K.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-01562 in Executive Session on 5 May 11, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Apr 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 17 Mar 11.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Mar 11.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, undated, w/atchs.
Exhibit F. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant Addendum, dated
28 Apr 11.
Exhibit G. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 6 May 11.
Panel Chair
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a personal statement (undated), a letter from a lawyer; documentation associated with his administrative discharge, which included a SF Form 93 (Report of Medical History), dated 10 April 1998, and a Mental Health Evaluation, dated 23 Jul 98; and copies of letters of admission from two universities. The reason for the proposed action was that applicant failed to indicate on his SF 93 [Report of Medical History] that he had been diagnosed...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01078
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01078 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with a honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to a 4C RE Code (separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-02473 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reinstated to active duty or his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to one that would allow him to reenlist in the service. Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 23 Sep 98. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02514
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02514 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to change his Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code JDA, Fraudulent Entry into Military Service and Re-entry (RE) code of 2C, Approved Honorable...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-00029
ADDENDUM RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00029-2 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 APRIL 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of “2Q” be changed so he may enlist in the military. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-00527
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00527 INDEX CODE: 100.03 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 AUG 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow him to reenter the military. However, the applicant has submitted evidence to support a change of...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 01-02264 INDEX CODE 100.06 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an entry level separation without characterization of service) to “1B” [sic – There is no “1B” RE code. A complete copy of the evaluation is at...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02794
On 4 February 2004, a new DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty was issued to the applicant changing the narrative reason for separation to “Secretarial Authority.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends changing the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority, but denial of the RE code change request. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03882
The reason for the commander’s recommendation was the applicant’s evaluation and diagnosis by the Behavioral Analysis Service with Axis I: Phase of Life Problem, maladjustment to military service, disqualifying severity. At the time the applicant was evaluated and diagnosed by mental health personnel with the unsuiting condition leading to his discharge, the evaluating psychiatrist noted that the applicant was “experiencing a temporary problem that should be “resolvable” within the next six...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 02696
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He had a medical condition (Graves Disease and Hyperthyroidism) prior to his discharge that the Air Force never treated him for nor followed-up on. In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal statement, and copies of his service and medical records. After considering the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and the BCMR Medical Consultant,...