Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01568
Original file (BC-2010-01568.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01568 

 INDEX CODE: 110.02 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty, be changed 
from Erroneous Entry (Other) to Medical. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

Her recruiter failed to mail her civilian medical documentation 
to the Surgeon General of the Air Force. 

 

In support of her request, the applicant provides copies of her 
DD Form 214, a Letter from her recruiter and civilian medical 
documentation. 

 

Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 1 Oct 09, she contracted her enlistment in the Regular Air 
Force. 

 

On 17 Jul 10, her commander notified her that he was recommending 
her discharge from the Air Force for erroneous enlistment. The 
specific reason for the discharge action was that she was 
diagnosed with an Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) repair. It 
was determined this condition existed prior to her enlistment. 
If the Air Force had known the severity of her condition prior to 
her enlistment, she would have not been cleared by the Military 
Entrance Processing Service (MEPS). 

 

Her commander advised her of her rights in this matter. 

 

On 17 Mar 10, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the 
notification and after consulting with legal counsel waived her 
right to submit statements in her own behalf. 

 


On 19 Mar 10, the legal office reviewed the case and found it 
legally sufficient to support separation and recommended an entry 
level separation. 

 

On 19 Mar 10, the discharge authority directed the applicant be 
discharged with an uncharacterized entry level separation. 

 

She was discharged on 24 Mar 10. She served 5 months and 24 days 
of active service. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AETC/SGPS recommends denial. AETC/SGPS indicates that at the 
time of her induction examination she met the induction criteria 
and was cleared for military service. Although she may have 
appeared to be asymptomatic in civilian life, her symptoms 
returned while in security forces training and became so severe 
that she could not continue her training and had to seek medical 
treatment. It is this new onset of symptoms which was aggravated 
by strenuous physical activity that rendered her unacceptable for 
military service. 

 

The complete AETC/SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
13 Aug 10 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or an injustice. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, the Board majority agrees with the 
opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary 
responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our 
decision that the applicant has failed to sustain her burden of 
proof of the existence of either an error or injustice. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 


basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: 

 

The majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or 
injustice and recommends the application be denied. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-01568 in Executive Session on 23 Sep 10, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

By majority vote, the Board voted to deny the application. 
voted to grant the relief requested but does not desire to submit 
a Minority Report. The following documentary evidence was 
considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Apr 10, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Military Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AETC/SGPS, dated 7 Jul 10. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Aug 10. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-01532

    Original file (BC-2009-01532.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her codes are unjust because she was told several times that her knee injury was not going to heal and she may have to go before a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) for discharge. On 1 Aug 07, her commander notified her that he was recommending her discharge from military service for Erroneous Enlistment. Although she was on active duty for 18 months, her medical records clearly reflect her symptoms first presented well within the first 180 days of military service.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01790

    Original file (BC 2013 01790.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 11 Apr 08, the applicant was furnished an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service with a narrative reason for separation of “Erroneous Entry (OTHER),” and an RE code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without characterization of service). In accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, chapter 5, the RE code 2C is required based on the entry-level separation with uncharacterized service and the applicant does not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03567

    Original file (BC-2010-03567.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03567 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her character of service be changed from “uncharacterized” to “honorable.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was counseled that she would receive an administrative discharge for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03479

    Original file (BC 2014 03479.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 Aug 07, she was discharged with a narrative reason for separation of “Erroneous entry (other)” and a RE code of “2C.” AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AETC/SGPS recommends denial of the applicant’s requests to change her separation and RE codes. It has been seven years since she was discharged from the service and she did not provide a reason why the application was not submitted within three years of her discharge. The applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02825

    Original file (BC-2012-02825.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02825 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her uncharacterized entry level separation be changed to honorable. DPSOS states that based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04700

    Original file (BC-2011-04700.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04700 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her character of service be changed from uncharacterized to honorable and her reentry (RE) code “2C” (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow her to reenter...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01441

    Original file (BC-2010-01441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01441 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her uncharacterized entry level separation, separation code of “JFW” which denotes failed medical/physical procurement standards, and reentry (RE) code of 4C (separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00559

    Original file (BC 2014 00559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It should be noted that the applicant completed Basic Military Training and was attending technical training school at the time she was identified as having asthma. On 20 Sep 13, the applicant’s examining provider entered the following comment in her medical record “Patient has a history of EPTE [existed prior to enlistment] asthma. While the Board notes the additional testing and associated documentation the applicant completed at Lackland Air Force Base, we concur with the opinion of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00607

    Original file (BC-2009-00607.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00607 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reason for discharge of “Erroneous Enlistment” be changed to “Medical”. In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of letter from her Senator’s office and a copy of her DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge from the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02525

    Original file (BC-2010-02525.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02525 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. On 20 Oct 08, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for Erroneous Enlistment. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...