Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1102057

Original file (ND1102057.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SR, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20110830

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:       RE-1

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         NONE              Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20061122     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20070402      Highest Rank/Rate: SR
Length of Service:
         Inactive:        Y ear s M onth 16 D a ys
         Active   Y ear s M onth s 25 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 62
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: N/A          Behavior: N/A    OTA: N/A

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NONE

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :     S CM :    SPCM:    C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :
- 20070313 :       For an RTC Incident Complaint Report to include: inappropriate behavior and unprofessional conduct, to wit: recruit-to-recruit while in a trainee status, failure to obey the rules and regulations at Recruit Training Command, and substandard performance.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11 effective 20 June 2005 until Present,
Article 1910-130, Separation by Reason of Defective Enlistments and Inductions - Erroneous Enlistment.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant wants to re-enlist.
2 .        The Applicant contends his reason for separation was erroneous .

Decision

Date : 20 1 2 0925             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to his discharge and the discharge process to ensure his discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included one NAVP ERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning . The Applicant was administratively processed for separation by his command due to Erroneous Enlistment because of back pain caused by abnormal curves in the upper back. The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived his rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement .

Issue 1: (Nondecisional) The Applicant wants to re-enlist. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a re - enlistment code. Only the B oard for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to re - enlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing re - enlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for re - enlistment through a recruiter. The Applicant submitted medical documentation that cleared him for military service. He should take that paperwork to a recruiter to obtain a medical waiver for re-enlistment.

Issue 2: (Decisional) (Propriety/Equity) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant contends his reason for separation was erroneous. After complaining of back pain at Recruit Training Command, c ompetent medical authority diagnosed the Applicant with kyphoscoliosis, determined that the condition existed prior to entry into the Navy, and further determined that he was unable to effectively service with this condition. Had all the relevant facts about the Applicant’s condition been known by the Navy, or had appropriate directives been followed, it is unlikely that the Applicant would have been allowed to enlist. Based on an error committed by the Navy, and no fraudulent intent on the part of the Applicant, his command administratively processed him for separation. Unless significant, substantial, and credible information exists to rebut the medical authority’s findings that occurred at or about the time of the Applicant’s separation from service, the NDRB does not have jurisdictional authority to override medical authority diagnoses or findings that result in administrative separation. Despite the medical documentation provided by the Applicant, the NDRB voted not to change the Erroneous Entry narrative reason. Relief denied.

An Uncharacterized discharge is warranted when s eparation is initiated while a member is within the first 180 days of continuous active duty except when the characterization of service as Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) is authorized or Honorable is clearly warranted. The Applicant had no misconduct that would rate an UOTHC discharge, and there was no evidence of unusual circumstances involving personal conduct and performance that would merit an Honorable.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found T herefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901886

Original file (ND0901886.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:REFLECT CORRECT REASON FOR DISCHARGE Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:NONEActive: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20080623Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20081029Highest Rank/Rate:SRLength of Service: Inactive: Year(s)02Month(s)17 Day(s)Active: Year(s)Month(s) 20 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 32EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA:...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200460

Original file (ND1200460.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks a change in his RE-code to reenlist.2. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100953

Original file (ND1100953.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

According to Navy regulations, a service member may be separated for erroneous enlistment if the enlistment would not have occurred if relevant facts had been known by the Department of the Navy, it was not the result of fraudulent conduct on the part of the service member, and the defect is unchanged in any material respect.The NDRB found evidence in the Applicant’s service record supporting his claim that while at the Military Entrance Processing Station he did disclose his pre-service...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001295

Original file (ND1001295.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found the characterization of service inequitable and the narrative reason for separation proper.Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400228

Original file (ND1400228.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100240

Original file (ND1100240.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Because the Narrative...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001579

Original file (ND1001579.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the re-characterization of a discharge and changing the Narrative Reason for Separation. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300598

Original file (ND1300598.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

DOLPH, Jennifer R., XXX-XX-4025, ex-SN, USN Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request Application Received: 20130115 Characterization of Service Received: Narrative Reason for Discharge: Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: JHD Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20120703 - 20120729 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20120730 Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment:...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000747

Original file (ND1000747.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20060906 - 20061119Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20061120Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20061218Highest Rank/Rate:FRLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)29 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 67EvaluationMarks:Performance:NONEAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000468

Original file (ND1000468.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB conducted a thorough review of the Applicant’s military service record, administrative separation package, the circumstances that led to her discharge, and the discharge process to ensure her discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety.In accordance with the MILPERSMAN, a member of the Naval Service may be separated on the basis of erroneous enlistment when that enlistment would not have occurred if relevant facts had been known by the Department of Navy and the...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1102057

Similar Decisions