Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100953
Original file (ND1100953.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20110302
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
 Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20090513 - 20090916     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Current Enlistment: 20090917     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20091013      Highest Rank/Rate: SN
Length of Service: Y ear s M onth s 27 D ays
 Education Level:        AFQT: 72
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: NONE         Behavior: NONE   OTA: NONE

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NONE

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP : NONE S CM : NONE SPCM: NONE C C : NONE Retention Warning Counseling: NONE

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ JFC ”
          “ ERRONEOUS ENTRY (OTHER) ”
The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:           Service/Medical Record:           Other Records:  
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation:           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:           From/To Representation:           From/To Congress member:        

Pertinent Regulation/Law
A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11 effective 20 June 2005 until Present, Article 1910-130, Separation by Reason of Defective Enlistments and Inductions - Erroneous Enlistment.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant seeks a Reentry (RE) Code change to re-enlist in the U. S. Navy.
2.       The Applicant contends he did not withhold any information about his medical history and, therefore, believes his enlistment was not erroneous as indi cated by Separation Code JFW.
3.       The Applicant wants his disc harge upgraded to Honorable.

Decision

Date: 20 1 2 0426             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation : NONE

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion
The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included no NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings and no misconduct resulting in nonjudicial punishment or court-martial. The Applicant was administratively processed for separation following a diagnosis of right shoulder joint pain from an injury that occurred prior to his enlistment but that had been revealed by the Applicant during the enlistment process . W hen notified of administrative separation processing using the notification procedure, the Applicant waived his rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement . The Applicant was not entitled to an administrative separation.

: (Non - decisional) The Applicant seeks an RE Code change to re-enlist in the U. S. Navy . Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, it is not authorized to change an RE code. An unfavorable RE code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to RE codes.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he did not withhold any information about his medical history and, therefore, believes his enlistment was not erroneous as indicated by Separation Code JFW. JFW is the Separation Code for Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards, which is covered under MILPERSMAN 1910-130, Erroneous En try. A ccording to Navy regulations, a service member may be separated for erroneous enlistment if the enlistment would not have occurred if relevant facts had been known by the Department of the Navy, it was not the result of fraudulent conduct on the part of the service member, and the defect is unchanged in any material respect. The NDRB found evidence in the Applicant’s service record supporting his claim that while at the Military Entrance Processing Station he did disclose his pre-service medical history about his right shoulder injury. On 25 September 2009, while at recruit training, the Applicant sought medical att ention for pain in his right shoulder. A qualified medical officer determined that the pain was related to his pre-service injury and that his condition could not be corrected to meet Navy standards. Thus, the Navy made an error when it still allowed him to enlist ; there was no fraud on the part of the Applicant, and the narrative reason for separation would have said Fraudulent Enlistment if this was the case. Rather, the Navy, aware of the injury, allowed the Applicant to proceed to basic training but subsequently determined that the Applicant did not meet the standards for continued service. The NDRB determined the discharge was proper and equitable and confirmed that Erroneous Entry was the proper narrative reason for separation . Relief denied.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant seeks an upgrade to an H onorable discharge. Navy regulations direct that the Character of Service for members notified of intended recommendation for discharge while in an entry level status (within the first 180 days of enlistment) be Uncharacterized except in circumstances where service has been so meritorious that an Honorable is clearly warranted. The Applicant’s record showed no meritorious service that would warrant an Honorable characterization of service. The NDRB found the Applicant’s characterization of service to be appropriate as assigned. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490, for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901942

    Original file (ND0901942.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the NDRB applauds the Applicant’s effort, but will not consider these post-service accomplishments to change either the character of service or narrative reason for separation. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400180

    Original file (ND1400180.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade to qualify for G.I. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200546

    Original file (MD1200546.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001724

    Original file (MD1001724.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant desires to have his re-enlistment code changed. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800955

    Original file (MD0800955.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is clear no such circumstance exists in the Applicant’s case and as such the NDRB determined the discharge characterization should remain “Uncharacterized.” Finally, with respect to nonservice-related administrative matters, i.e., VA benefits, educational pursuits and especially civilian employment, an uncharacterized separation is considered the equivalent of an honorable or general (under honorable conditions) discharge.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101510

    Original file (ND1101510.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:ELIGIBLE FOR RE-ENLISTMENT Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20100108 - 20100322Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20100323Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20100602Highest Rank/Rate: SRLength of Service: Years Months 10 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 68EvaluationMarks:Performance:NONEBehavior:NONEOTA: NONEAwards and Decorations (per...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001628

    Original file (ND1001628.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20080624 - 20090310Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20090311Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20090402Highest Rank/Rate: SRLength of Service: YearMonth22 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 72EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1501059

    Original file (ND1501059.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400255

    Original file (MD1400255.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the Applicant’s medical condition, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s separation was warranted, but a narrative reason of Erroneous Entry, Other would be more appropriate. Full relief to Honorable was not granted, because the Applicant served less than 180 days.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found the discharge was warranted and equitable. ” Additional...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1002237

    Original file (ND1002237.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...