Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901886

Original file (ND0901886.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SR, USNR

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20090624

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:       REFLECT CORRECT REASON FOR DISCHARGE

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         NONE             Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20080623     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20081029      Highest Rank/Rate: SR
Length of Service :
Inactive: Y ear ( s ) 02 M onth ( s ) 17 D a y ( s )
Active: Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 20 D a y ( s )

Education Level:        AFQT: 32
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: NFIR         Behavior: NFIR OTA: NFIR

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NONE

Periods of UA /C ONF : NJP : S CM : SPCM: C C :
Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
DD 214:                   Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :
         Health/Medical Records:          Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:          Community Service:                References:
Additional Statements :
From Applicant:                  From /To Representat ion :          From /To Congress m ember :
Oth er Documentation :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), effective 20 June 2005 until Present, Article 1910-130, Separation by Reason of Defective Enlistments and Inductions - Erroneous Enlistment.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant believes his discharge should not have been characterized as erroneous since his knee injury was fully healed prior to enlistment and the Navy was aware of the prior injury.

Decision

Date : 20 10 0805 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included no NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings or any misconduct resulting in nonjudicial punishment or court-martial. The Applicant was involuntarily discharged at recruit training for erroneous entry not related to drug or alcohol abuse as evidenced by his separation code on his DD-214. T he NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived rights to c onsult with a qualified counsel or submit a written statement. The Applicant was not entitled to an administrative board.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant would like an Honorable discharge and believes his discharge should not have been characterized as erroneous since his knee injury was fully healed prior to enlistment and the Navy was aware of the prior injury. The Applicant claims he reinjured his knee during recruit training and was subsequently separated. Enlistment medical documentation clearly shows the Applicant fully disclosed a prior knee injury and associated corrective surgery , and the Navy did accept him for enlistment . The NDRB did not have access to the Applicant’s separation package but presumes regularity on the part of Recruit Training Command in that it separated the Applicant when he reinjured his knee. Per Naval Military Personnel Manual (MILPERSMAN), Article 130, “a member may be separated on the basis of erroneous enlistment, reenlistment, induction, or extension of enlistment when a. the enlistment would not have occurred if relevant facts had been known by Department of the Navy or had appropriate directives been followed and b. the enlistment was not the result of fraudulent conduct on the part of member.” Because the Applicant was truthful at enlistment and the Navy accepted him despite his previous injury, Erroneous Entry is the appropriate Narrative Reason for Separation, because it was the Navy’s erroneous decision to accept him for enlistment. Erroneous Entry is not considered a negative Narrative Reason for Separation and differs from Fraudulent Entry, which is warranted when a potential recruit lies or withholds relevant information. The reenlistment code on the Applicant’s DD-214 , RE-3E , indicates erroneous ind uction and the separation code , JFC, indicates “erroneously enlisted, not related to drug or alcohol abuse . ”

Additionally, an Honorable discharge is not warranted, because the Applicant served for less than 180 days. Per MILPERSMAN , Article 1910-308, an Uncharacterized (Entry Level Separation) is authorized when separation occurs “within first 180 days of continuous active duty.” Uncharacterized is not considered a negative character of service. The NDRB found no change in characterization or narrative reason to be warranted.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002229

Original file (MD1002229.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The Applicant contends he was cleared to enlist in the Marine Corps with a pre-existing knee injury and does not believe he should be penalized for disclosing that information.Marine Corps regulations direct that members notified of intended recommendation for discharge while in an entry level status (within the first 180 days of enlistment) receive an Uncharacterized...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400533

Original file (ND1400533.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801216

Original file (ND0801216.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Additionally, the Board determined the characterization of service was also appropriate based on the evidence of record. The NDRB advises the Applicant that, with respect to nonservice related administrative matters, i.e. Department of Veterans Affairs benefits, civilian employment, etc., an uncharacterized separation shall be considered the equivalent of an honorable or general (under honorable conditions) characterization.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300415

Original file (MD1300415.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

There is no indication in the evidence of record or in the documentation submitted by the Applicant that the Applicant was recommended for or processed for a medical board by proper authority. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100673

Original file (ND1100673.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20090515 - 20100315Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20100316Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20100423Highest Rank/Rate:ARLength of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 08 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 43EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902410

Original file (ND0902410.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Furthermore, with respect to non-service related administrative matters, i.e. Department of Veterans Affairs benefits, civilian employment, etc., an Uncharacterized separation shall be considered the equivalent of an Honorable or General characterization.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and administrative separationprocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101395

Original file (ND1101395.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000703

Original file (ND1000703.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Partial relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found the characterization of the discharge was proper and equitable, but the narrative reason was not. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100395

Original file (ND1100395.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400507

Original file (ND1400507.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20101027 - 20110130Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20110131Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20111118Highest Rank/Rate:AALength of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 18 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 62EvaluationMarks:Performance:N/ABehavior:N/AOTA: N/AAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):Periods of UA/CONF:...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901886

Similar Decisions