Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200460

Original file (ND1200460.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SA, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20111227

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:       ERRONEOUS ENTRY

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20080111 - 20080527     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20080528     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20080617      Highest Rank/Rate: SA
Length of Service: Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 20 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 40
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: N/A          Behavior: N/A    OTA: N/A

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NONE

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :     S CM :    SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11 effective 20 June 2005 until Present, Article 1910-130, Separation by Reason of Defective Enlistments and Inductions - Erroneous Enlistment.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.        The Applicant seeks a change in his RE-code to reenlist .
2.       The Applicant seeks a change in his characterization of service and separation code.
3 .       The Applicant contends the recruiter failed to acknowledge his dependent.

Decision

Date : 20 1 3 0110             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service did not include any NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings, non-judicial punishments or trials by court-martial for violation s of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The Applicant had a dependent at the time of his enlistment , however, this information was not properly annotated in the Applicant’s military records prior to entering the military. Had this information been known by the Navy, it may have changed the Navy’s decision to enlist the Applicant. Based on an error committed by the Navy, and no fraudulent intent on the part of the Applicant, his command administratively processed him for separation.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks a change in his RE-code to reenlist into the Armed Forces Reserves. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the B oard for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant seeks a change in his characterization of service and separation code . An Uncharacterized discharge is warranted when separation is initiated while a member is within the first 180 days of continuous active duty except when the characterization of service as Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) is authorized or Honorable is clearly warranted. The Applicant had no misconduct that would rate an UOTHC discharge, and there was no evidence of unusual circumstances involving personal conduct and performance that would merit an Honorable characterization. Since the Applicant served only 20 days, an U ncharacterized discharge is the most appropriate characterization of service. The JFC separation code correlates w ith the narrative reason for why the Applicant was discharged. Erroneous Entry (Other) is an accurate description per the Naval Military Personnel Manual . No other narrative reason or separation code more clearly describes the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s processing for administrative separation. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends the recruiter failed to acknowledge his dependent at the time of enlistment. The Navy discharged the Applicant for Erroneous Entry, not Fraudulent Entry, which would have been appropriate if it had been determined that the Applicant withheld information about his dependent. Erroneous Entry, however, is assigned when an error is committed by the Navy. After the information came to the attention of the Applicant’s command, they determined to separate the Applicant . The NDRB noted no impropriety or inequity in the discharge proceedings. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100760

Original file (ND1100760.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the Applicant’s failure to disclose pre-service drug use, his command administratively processed him for separation due to Erroneous Enlistment - Drug Abuse.The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived his rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601064

Original file (ND0601064.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By a vote of the Reason for Discharge shall -ERRONEOUS ENLISTMENT.Summary of Service:Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19990414-19990509Active: NONE Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19990510Years Contracted:; Date of Discharge: 19990602 Length of Service: 00Yrs 00 Mos 23 Days (does not exclude lost time, if any)Time Lost During This Period: Education Level: Age at this Enlistment: AFQT: 54Highest Rate/Rank:FRPerformance Evaluation Averages:NOT APPLICABLEAwards and...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101900

Original file (ND1101900.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Decisional issues: The Applicant did not identify any decisional issues related to the propriety or equity of the discharge action; however, he requested an NDRB review, contending he warrants a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of his service at discharge. The NDRB conducted a thorough review of the Applicant’s military service record, administrative separation package, the circumstances that led to the discharge, and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001025

Original file (ND1001025.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19990429 - 19990505Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19990506Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:19990610Highest Rank/Rate:ARLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)05 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 52EvaluationMarks:Performance:N/ABehavior:N/AOTA: N/AAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000330

Original file (ND1000330.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801193

Original file (ND0801193.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board found his “Uncharacterized ” discharge appropriate and an upgrade to “General (Under Honorable Conditions)” would be inappropriate.The Applicant should be aware that, with respect to nonservice-related administrative matters, i.e., VA benefits, educational pursuits, and especially civilian employment, an “Uncharacterized ” separation is considered the equivalent of an “Honorable ” or “General (Under Honorable Conditions) ” discharge.After a thorough review of the available...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001077

Original file (ND1001077.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20050614 - 20051106Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20051107Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20051129Highest Rank/Rate:SRLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)23 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 61EvaluationMarks:NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of UA/CONF: NJP:SCM: SPCM:CC:Retention...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001469

Original file (ND1001469.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Separation Authority directed that the Applicant be discharged for Defective Enlistment or Induction – Erroneous Enlistment and that the Applicant’s characterization of service at discharge be General (Under Honorable Conditions). Propriety - In accordance with the MILPERSMAN, a member of the Naval Service may be separated on the basis of erroneous enlistment when that enlistment would not have occurred if relevant facts had been known by the Department of the Navy and the enlistment...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700396

Original file (ND0700396.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the circumstances that resulted in the characterization of discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100953

Original file (ND1100953.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

According to Navy regulations, a service member may be separated for erroneous enlistment if the enlistment would not have occurred if relevant facts had been known by the Department of the Navy, it was not the result of fraudulent conduct on the part of the service member, and the defect is unchanged in any material respect.The NDRB found evidence in the Applicant’s service record supporting his claim that while at the Military Entrance Processing Station he did disclose his pre-service...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200460

Similar Decisions