Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902154

Original file (ND0902154.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-FC3, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20090728

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:       HARDSHIP

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20040831 - 20041026     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20041027     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20071109      Highest Rank/Rate: FC3
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 10 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 80
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.5 ( 2 )      Behavior: 3.0 ( 3 )        OTA: 3.39

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :

S CM :

SPCM:

C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214:

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, should read: “ NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
DD 214:                   Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :
         Health/Medical Records:          Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:          Community Service:                References:
Additional Statements :
From Applicant:                  From /To Representat ion :          From /To Congress m ember :
Oth er Documentation :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 16, effective 24 July 2006 until 28 May 2008, Article 1910-122, Separation By Reason of Convenience of the Government - Personality Disorder(s).

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. Requests a narrative reason for separation of Hardship, because he was n ever diagnosed with a personality disorder and was under a tremendous amount of stress.

Decision

Date: 20 10 0722 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included no incidents of misconduct. During a 15 October 2007 psych ological evaluation at Naval Health Clinic Hawaii, however, a staff psychologist diagnosed the Applicant with Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Disturbance of Emotions and Conduct and recommended an administrative separation. Based on th is diagnosis, his command administratively processed for separation. T he NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review .

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends that he was never diagnosed with any kind of personality disorder but was under a tremendous amount of stress due to his wife’s mental illness and her inability to care for their three children while he was deployed. Therefore, he requests a narrative reason for separation of Hardship rather than Personality Disorder. After reviewing the Applicant’s service and medical records, there is no doubt that he had a lot of stress with three young chi ldren and a mentally ill wife. His command provided support by sending him home from deployment in 2006 to attend to his wife and (at the time) two children. Further, the Exceptional Family Member Program was available, though the Applicant never enrolled his wife in this program.

Per Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 16, effective 24 July 2006 until 28 May 2008, Article 1910-110, Separation by Reason of Convenience of the Government – Hardship, a service member must meet seven criteria to be considered for a Hardship discharge. The Applicant did not meet two of the se criteria (1. a severe hardship exists, not normally encountered and resolved by other members of the Naval Services and 2. the member and family have made every reasonable effort to alleviate the hardship). Ultimately, it is the responsibility of the service member to apply for a Hardship discharge while still on active duty.

The Applicant submitted a psychiatric evaluation conducted on 1 July 2009 that indicated no depression or personality disorders. The Applicant’s psychological evaluation in October 2007, however, as referenced above, revealed a personality disorder for which he was appropriately separated with an Honorable discharge.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001937

Original file (MD1001937.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant.The Applicant’s record of...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300574

Original file (ND1300574.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900463

Original file (ND0900463.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.In-service mental health problems warrant change in characterization and narrative reason for separation.3. Decision Date: 20091118Location: Washington D.C.Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301529

Original file (ND1301529.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his discharge narrative reason should be changed to “medical. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain.The...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600053

Original file (ND0600053.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION It is therefore predictable he will not be effective in the performance of his duties. The Board discovered no impropriety after a review of Applicant’s case.
NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00990

Original file (ND04-00990.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION I am requesting that my separation code is changed from personality disorder to hardship. My wife was also enlisting and shipping to training at the same time.
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201092

Original file (ND1201092.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

The Applicant contends his discharge was inequitable, because he was told he would receive a medical discharge or an Honorable characterization of service.After being diagnosed with an Adjustment Disorder, the Applicant was processed for administrative separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900418

Original file (ND0900418.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001376

Original file (ND1001376.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

(3) The Applicant contends that his discharge was improper and that a narrative reason for discharge of “Hardship” was the more appropriate reason for separation. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, and medical record entries, and the Applicant’s attestation of the events surrounding his discharge action, the NDRB determined that Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301682

Original file (ND1301682.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:HARDSHIP Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20040830 - 20050720Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20050721Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20080408Highest Rank/Rate: FC3Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 19 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 62EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(1)Behavior:3.5(2)OTA: 3.17Awards and Decorations (per DD...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902154

Similar Decisions