Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001937

Original file (MD1001937.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20100730

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to: HARDSHIP/RE-2

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20050804 - 20050814     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20050815     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20080729      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 15 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 42
MOS: 3381
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle Pistol

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP:
- 20070910 :      Article (Larceny)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM: SPCM: CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20070223 :       For my lack of judgment and violation of Article 92. Specifically, in July 2006 I was prescribed Percocet as a result of dental surgery. During January of 2007, I used that prescription for a thumb injury that occurred during physical training , which eventually was detected on a random urinalysis.

- 20070718 :       For my insubordinate conduct toward a Sergeant in the United States Marine Corps. In addition I displayed a lack of integrity, maturity , and responsibility. Specifically, on 20070714 I failed to follow direct orders given to me by a Sergeant of Marines. As a Corporal I must lead by example and prevent actions that are contrary to good order and discipline.

- 200804 27 :       For domestic violence. Specifically on 20080211, you and your wife were in a verbal altercation that escalated into a domestic dispute.

- 20080724 :       Informed I am not eligible for reenlistment due to my separation from the U.S. Marine Corps by reason of convenience of the government due to my personality disorder, and I will be assigned a reenlistment eligibility code of RE-3P.

- 20080724 :       For violation of restraining order case number 08CVC1020, on 20080715 at 1200. It was brought to the attention of my chain of command that I was in or around the residence of my estranged wife while a restraining order is in place by the Havelock Police department.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant desires to change his reenlistment code to RE-2.
2. The Applicant contends he does not have a personality disorder, was under a tremendous amount of stress, and let his emotions get out of control. Additionally, he wishes to change his narrative reason for separation to H ardship.

Decision

Date: 2011 0428          Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings , and for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article ( , ). Based on his diagnosis, and the recommendation of competent medical authority, the Applicant ’s command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing , the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant desires to change his reenlistment code to RE-2. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the B oard for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he does not have a personality disorder, was under a tremendous amount of stress, and let his emotions get out of control. Additionally, he wishes to change his narrative reason for separation to H ardship. The record shows the Applicant was referred to mental health at the Cherry Point Naval Hospital for suicidal ideations. Following approximately three weeks of observation, competent medical authority recommended expeditious separation from the Marine Corps with a diagnosis of Adjustment and Personality Disorder. In support of his contention, the Applicant submitted a psycho-therapy assessment from a civilian mental health care provider dated 1 June 2010. This assessment is not overtly conclusive but indicates the Applicant is currently in good overall health. Regardless of the Applicant’s current mental health situation, at the time of his separation, he was clearly diagnosed with Adjustment and Personality Disorder by competent medical authority. The Applicant was recommended for expeditious separation and was found to be a danger to himself and others. Despite having average proficiency and conduct markings of 4.2/4.2, t he Applicant had significant misconduct refle cted in his one NJP for larceny and retention warnings for domestic violence and violation of a protective order, which warranted a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service. The Applicant presented no documentation or evidence to warrant a change to his narrative reason for separation or to overcome the NDRB’s presumption of regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs. The NDRB determined the characterization of service and nar rative reason for separation to be appropriate as assigned. No change is warranted.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6203.3 CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300208

Original file (ND1300208.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant wants his separation code changed to RE-3H to reenlist.2. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall but the narrative reason for separation shall remain.The Applicant remains...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901366

Original file (MD0901366.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20060610 - 20070604Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20070605Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20080915Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)11 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:41MOS: 9971Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):(3)/ (3)Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500690

Original file (MD1500690.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000097

Original file (MD1000097.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Separation Authority directed that the Applicant be discharged with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge and that for reporting purposes, the primary basis for separation was Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure; the Applicant’s Form DD-214 erroneously reflects a narrative reason for separation of Convenience of the Government (Personality Disorder). The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected to reflect the narrative reason for...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1002333

Original file (ND1002333.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500600

Original file (MD1500600.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100627

Original file (MD1100627.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities as regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and the administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300434

Original file (MD1300434.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Therefore, the NDRB determined the Applicant warranted an upgrade to Honorable. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902616

Original file (MD0902616.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

However, even if he had been in processing for medical separation, appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons.The NDRB determined the Applicant was properly separated by reason of misconduct and not eligible to receive a medical discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1102039

Original file (ND1102039.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Neither did the NDRB find any information in his service record indicating he ever submitted a request to be discharged due to a hardship. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001937

Similar Decisions