Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301682

Original file (ND1301682.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-FCSN, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20130820

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:       HARDSHIP

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        20040830 - 20050720     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20050721     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 200804 08      Highest Rank/Rate: FC3
Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 19 D ay(s)
Education Level:        AFQT: 62
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.0 ( 1 )      Behavior: 3.5 ( 2 )        OTA: 3.17

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):

Periods of C ONF :

NJP :

- 20071217 :      Article (Absence without leave)
         Article (Failure to obey order or regulation)
         Awarded: Suspended:

S CM :    SPCM:    C C :

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 20080122 :      For failure to maintain or be able to comply with the Family Care Plan

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant contends serious family issues led to his other than honorable discharge .
2. The Applicant contends his command denied him the opportunity to submit a statement about his severe family hardship to the Separation Authority.

Decision

Date: 20 1 4 0227 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning and for o f the Uniform Code of Mil itary Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Absence without leave , 1 specification) and Article 92 ( Failure to obey order or regulation , 1 specification ) . Based on the Applicant’s inability to comply with a Navy Family Care Plan, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review .

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends serious family issues led to his other than honorable discharge. The NDRB recognizes that serving in the military is challenging. Most service members, however, serve honorably and therefore earn their Honorable discharges. In fairness to those service members, commanders and separation authorities are tasked to ensure that undeserving Sailors receive no higher characterization than is due. With the Applicant’s NJP for violating UCMJ Articles 86 and 92, he met the requirements to be administratively separ ated for Misconduct (Serious Offense). However, the command leniently processed the Applicant for separation due to Parenthood or Custody of Minor Children after he was unable to comply with a Navy Family Care Plan. Per Naval Military Personnel Manual, NAVPERS 15560C, Change 14, effective 29 March 2006 until 3 August 2010, Article 1910-124, SEPARATION BY REASON OF CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT – PARENTHOOD, characterization of service should be Honorable unless a General is warranted. An Honorable characterization of service is warranted when the quality of a member’s service generally meets the standard of acceptable conduct and performance for Naval personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization of service would be clearly inappropriate. A General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge is warranted when the quality of the member’s service has been honest and faithful but significant negative aspects of the member’s conduct or performance of duty outweighed the positive aspects of the member’s service record. In addition to the NJP, his commanding officer stated in the recommendation for administrative separation that the Applicant “was an administrative burden during his tour on ARLEIGH BURKE due to repeated misconducts. Additionally, his performance was lackluster, and he often skirted his responsibilities.” After a complete review of the Applicant’s record, the NDRB determined his discharge was proper and equitable. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his command denied him the opportunity to submit a statement about his severe family hardship to the Separation Authority. On 23 January 2008, his commanding officer notified the Applicant, in writing, of his intent to process him for administrative separation for Parenthood or Custody of Minor Children where the least favorable characterization of service could be General (Under Honorable Conditions). The Applicant, in writing on 23 January 2008, waived his rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement to the Separation Authority , and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review . On 11 February 2008, his command sent the separation recommendation to the Separation Authority (Comma nder, Navy Personnel

Command). After waiving his right to make a statement, the Applicant still had 19 days to change his mind before the command sent the recommendation to the Separation Authority. The NDRB found no evidence that he was denied the opportunity to submit a statement about his severe family hardship. Quite the contrary to what the Applicant alleges about an unjust discharge, his command and the Separation Authority took into consideration his severe family hardship by approving a Parenthood or Custody of Minor Children discharge with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service when he warranted an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge for Misconduct (Serious Offense). Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C, Change 14, effective 29 March 2006 until 3 August 2010, Article 1910-124, SEPARATION BY REASON OF CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT - PARENTHOOD.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000177

Original file (ND1000177.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

On 20 August 2001, the Separation Authority approved the recommendation for administrative separation and the Applicant was discharged under Honorable conditions with a re-enlistment code of RE-3B (Parenthood or custody of minor children a member is unable to perform prescribed duties, or unable to comply with family care plan requirements-Ineligible to reenlist without a Commander, Navy Recruiting Command waiver). Pursuant to the Commanding Officer’s recommendation for administrative...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1102150

Original file (ND1102150.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:HDG to MDB Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20010108 - 20010122Active:20010123 - 2003033020030331 - 20070201 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20070202Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20110119Highest Rank/Rate:MM1Length of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 18 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 79EvaluationMarks:Performance:4.0(4)Behavior:3.8(4)OTA:...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700764

Original file (ND0700764.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-EM3, USN ND07-00764 Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request Application Received: 20070515 Characterization Received: Narrative Reason: PARENTHODD OR CUSTODIAN OF MINOR CHILDREN Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-124 Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: FAMILY HARDSHIP Applicant’s Issues: 1. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “http://Boards.law.af.mil.” Additional Reviews: Subsequent to a document...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500211

Original file (ND1500211.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall change to HONORABLE and the narrative reason for separation shall remain PARENTHOOD OR CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILDREN. ” Additional Reviews : After a document...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101110

Original file (ND1101110.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmentalaffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500409

Original file (ND1500409.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall change to HONORABLE and the narrative reason for separation shall remain PARENTHOOD OR CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILDREN. ” Additional Reviews : After a document...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601017

Original file (ND0601017.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation Record not available. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE Date Notified:19990811Reason for Processing:CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT - Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 19990811Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) GCMCA Review Administrative...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301058

Original file (ND1301058.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:HARDSHIP/DEPENDENCY Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20030730 - 20040322Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20040323Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20051014Highest Rank/Rate:SNLength of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 22 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 82EvaluationMarks:Performance:4.0(2)Behavior:4.0(2)OTA: 3.50Awards and Decorations (per...
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501287

Original file (ND0501287.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requested that her narrative reason for separation be changed to “Hardship”. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (D).The Applicant requested that her narrative reason for separation be changed to “hardship”.
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400038

Original file (ND1400038.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. DEPARTMENT OF THE...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301682

Similar Decisions