Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900463
Original file (ND0900463.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-FC3, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20081219
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 3620225 [personality disorder]

 Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to: SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19900320 - 19900909     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Current Enlistment: 19900910     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 19931223      Highest Rank/Rate: FC3
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 14 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 61
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.9 ( 2 )      Behavior: 3.9 ( 2 )        OTA: 3.80

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      (WITH 1 STAR)

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP : S CM : SPCM: C C :

Retention Warning Counseling:

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ MILPERSMAN 3620225 ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:                   Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:     
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:                  From /To Representat ion :            From /To Congress m ember :         

Oth er Documentation :   



Applicant Testified:
Applicant Available for Questions:
Witnesses:
Observers:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 5, effective 5 March 1993 until 21 July 1994, Article 3620200, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT.

 B. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C, Change 5, effective 930305 - 940721), Article 3620225, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT ON THE BASIS OF PERSONALITY DISORDER.

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. I n-service mental health problems warrant change in characterization and nar rative r eason for separation .
3. Post -service conduct warrants consideration.

Decision

Date: 20 0 9 1118 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The NDRB found no evidence in the Applicant’s record of service of any NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings or misconduct resulting in nonjudicial punishment (NJP) or court-martial. The staff psychologist (Fleet Mental Health, Naval Station, San Diego) diagnosed the Applicant with personality disorder, not otherwise specified, with oppositional and self defeating traits, on 9 December 1993, and recommended expeditious administrative separation. When processed for a dministrative s eparation, the Applicant waived his right s to consult with qualified counsel and submit a written statement; he was not eligible to r equest an administrative discharge b oard.

Issue 1 : (Decisional) ( ) PARTIAL . The Applicant contends his discharge does not accurately reflect his character of service in light of his mitigating in-service mental health problems and requests a change in narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority . The Applicant was diagnosed by a competent military medical authority who determined the Applicant was suffer ing from a personality disorder, was unsuitable for retention in the U.S. Navy, would neither require nor benefit from hospitalization or psychiatric treatment, was judged to represent a continuing danger himself and others , and was recommended for expeditious administ rative separation by reason of convenience of the g overnment due to personality d i sorder . The NDRB determined the record of evidence reflects the Applicant met the requirements for processing by reason of convenience of the g overnment due to personality disorder at the time of discharge, and discerned no impropriety in the discharge action. However, based on the Applicant ’s documented proficient and industrious performance of duty and no military or civilian misconduct , the NDRB did discern an inequity in the characterization of service and voted unanimously to upgrade it .

The Applicant was involuntar ily separated from the n aval service by reason of c onvenience of the g overnment – p ersonality d isorder. The Applicant’s personality disorder was not considered a disability, but determined to potentially interfere with his assignment or performance of duty. The Applicant provided no documentary evidence to refute his diagnosis. Therefore, t he NDRB determined “Personality Disorder ” was the most appropriate reason for separation.

Issue 2: (Decisional) ( ) The Applicant contends his post-service conduct warrants consideration for an upgrade in characterization. The NDRB did review this issue, but since the NDRB granted partial relief based on the first issue no further response is required.
Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, and medical r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .




ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Association of Service Disable Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501476

    Original file (ND0501476.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20010911 by reason of convenience of the government on the basis of a diagnosed personality disorder (A) with a service characterization of general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant was discharged on 20010911 with a DD Form 214 that listed the separation authority as MILPERSMAN 1910-102 and the narrative reason for separation as personality disorder. On 20010926, the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00193

    Original file (ND03-00193.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    My reason for discharge was a medical condition.” Documentation The Applicant’s service record and discharge package were not available. At this time, the applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider. Therefore, relief will not be granted.The applicant is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00817

    Original file (ND04-00817.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00817 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040422. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION 030926: DD Form 214 issued, Applicant discharged with Honorable characterization by reason of personality disorder.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902154

    Original file (ND0902154.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300574

    Original file (ND1300574.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00480

    Original file (ND99-00480.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation Only the service record and medical record was considered since the applicant did not provide additional documentation. The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an applicant's discharge, will change the reason for discharge if such a change is warranted. The summary of service clearly documents that personality disorder was the reason the applicant was discharged.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301529

    Original file (ND1301529.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his discharge narrative reason should be changed to “medical. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain.The...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101308

    Original file (ND1101308.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Narrative Reason for Discharge:Authority for Discharge:MILPERSMAN3620225 [PERSONALITY DISORDER] DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends she received an improper “ RE ” code and request it be changed. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100823

    Original file (ND1100823.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The NDRB determined that changing the characterization of service would be against regulations. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00914

    Original file (ND04-00914.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests his discharge characterization of service received at the time of discharge changed to honorable. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the characterization of discharge shall change to: HONORABLE and the narrative reason shall remain personality disorder, authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-122, Separation Code “KFX.” PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Under applicable regulations, separations based on a personality disorder should be honorable unless a general...