Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700227
Original file (ND0700227.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-AA, USN
ND07-00227
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20061213   Characterization Received: OTHER THAN HONORABLE
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT DRUG ABUSE Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-146

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Applicant claims his discharge was improper based on never testing positive on a urinalysis test.
                           2. Post service - Equity

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .     
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT DRUG ABUSE .
Date: 20 070920 Location: Washington D.C. The Board found that

Discussion

 Issue 1 ( ) : The Applicant claims his discharge was improper based on never testing positive on a urinalysis test. Although the Applicant was never tested for drugs , he self a dmitted drug usage and was subsequently process ed for administrative separation . The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. The NDRB recognizes that serving in the U.S. Navy is challenging. Our country is fortunate to have men and women willing to ensure the hardships and sacrifices required in order to serve their country. The Applicant ’ s self-admission to drug use is considered as “ wrongful use of a controlled substance ” punishable under the UCMJ, Article 112a. The NRDB found that the Applicant ’ s service was equitably and properly characterized.

Issue 2 ( ) : There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant ’ s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (DEP)      20000728 - 20000911              Active:         
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20000912      Years Contracted : ; Extension:                   Date of Discharge: 20011206
Length of Service : 01 Yrs 02 Mths 25 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 38          Highest Rank /Rate : AA
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: N/A          Behavior: N/A             OTA: N/A
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NONE

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 20010105 :        CO's NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 8 1 – Conspiracy; viol UCMJ Art. 92 – Failure to obey order or regulation; viol UCMJ Art. 134 – Disorderly conduct, drunkenness . Awarded - FOP ($ 521.00 ) for ( 1 month); Restr for ( 30d ays); Extra duties ( 30 days).

20010213:        Retention Warning for (Inappropriate conduct ashore that brings discredit upon the Armed Forces and is in contrary to Navy Core Values of Honor, Courage, and Commitment. Specifically, violating UCMJ Article 111, drunken or reckless operation of a vehicle).
20010531:        Suspect’s Rights Acknowledgement Statement: Applicant stated he smoked marijuana and methamphetamines.
Discharge Process

 Date Notified:                                       20010611
Reason for Discharge:     -
        
Least Favorable Characterization:       

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20010719
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                       
         GCMCA review                               

Administrative Board Date :       20010830
Findings, by preponderance of the evidence:     BY - .
         BY SEPARATION WARRANTED.
Recommendation on Separation:   BY 12 MONTHS
Recommendation on Characterization:     BY

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20011015 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDER, NAVAL AIR FORCE, U.S. PACIFIC FLEET ( 20011120 )
 Reason for discharge directed:  -
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       20011206

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe) Letter of Completion of 2 months First phrase Ministry program,


Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 33, effective 16 Jul 2001 until 21 Aug 2002, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 111 ( drunken or reckless operation of a vehicle) and 112a (wrongful use of a controlled substance) .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701047

    Original file (ND0701047.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19920910 - 19930120Active: 19930121 - 19970115 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19970116Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:19990602Length of Service: 02 Yrs 04Mths17 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700210

    Original file (ND0700210.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMC (DEP)19960913 - 19961020Active: USMC19961021 - 19961125Inactive: NONE Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20000622Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20011230 Length of Service: 01 Yrs 06Mths09 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level: Age at...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700046

    Original file (ND0700046.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ex-ENFA, USNND07-00046Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request Application Received: 20061018Characterization of Service:Reason for Discharge: ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE Discharge Authority:MILPERSMAN1910-152Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Applicant’s Issues (as summarized by NDRB):1. By a vote of the Reason for Discharge shall ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE. In light of the Applicant’s documented 2 retention warnings, 3 nonjudicial...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700712

    Original file (MD0700712.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “ CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 960725 UNTIL 000816 ” “ NONE”The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700131

    Original file (ND0700131.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Improper2. The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700221

    Original file (ND0700221.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct which resulted in the Applicant’s discharge and characterization of his service. After a thorough review of the available evidence, including the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20020043 - 20020514Active: Period of Service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700953

    Original file (ND0700953.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Process Date Notified: 20020919Reason for Discharge:--Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification:20020919 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board GCMCA review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20021003) Separation Authority (date): COMNAVPERSCOM (20021024)Reason for discharge directed: - Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20021126 Types...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700369

    Original file (ND0700369.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Awarded - FOP ($amount) for (months); RIR (paygrade); Restr for (# days); Extra duties (# days).20030319: Retention Warning for provoking speeches or gestures, assault, sub-standard performance as stated on NAVPERS 1610/2 dated 20011207-20020715, lack of responsibility, unsatisfactory demeanor/conduct, failure to live up to the Navy Core Values, unwillingness and/or inability to follow lawful orders and/or regulations, unwillingness and/or inability to work with others, failure to understand...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700258

    Original file (ND0700258.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record clearly reflects that the applicant established a pattern of misconduct evident by two nonjudicial punishments for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 86 (Unauthorized absence), Article 92 (failure to obey an order), and Article 111 (Drunken and reckless operation of a vehicle). Discharge Process Date Notified: NOT FOUND IN RECORDReason for Discharge:Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification:NOT FOUND IN RECORDRights...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700105

    Original file (ND0700105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In so choosing, the record also demonstrates that the Applicant had the opportunity to review the evidence against him, discuss that evidence and his options with detailed defense counsel, and admitted guilt to the charge against him in order to avoid such a trial. 20050926 Consulted with or Waived Counsel: Acknowledged Understanding Elements: Acknowledged Guilt to: Article(s) 80 BCD/DD authorized for offense(s) Acknowledged Consequences of OTH: Type of Characterization...