Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700046
Original file (ND0700046.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-ENFA, USN
ND07-00046
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

 Application Received: 20 061018    Characterization of Service:
Reason for Discharge : ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE     Discharge Authority : MILPERSMAN 1910-152

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
        
Applicant’s Issues (as summarized by NDRB):
1. Want GI Bill
2. Medical problems contributed to reason for discharge.
Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .     
By a vote of the Reason for Discharge shall ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE .
Date of Decision: 20 070823                 Location of Board: WASHIN gton D.C.

Discussion

Issue(s) 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 ( ). The Applicant implies that his problems in the Navy can be attributed to his “medical issues.” The Board was unable to discern any connection between the medical problems the Applicant cited (spider bite, asbestos) and his clearly documented alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure . Further, the Applicant’s record indicates that he met the criteria for discharge for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense or due to a pattern of misconduct. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. In light of the Applicant’s documented 2 retention warnings, 3 nonjudicial punishments and his alcohol rehabilitation treatment failure, the Board determined that an upgrade of his characterization of service to honorable was not warranted.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.

Summary of Service

 Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20030623 - 20030707                  Active:                                    
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 20030708      Years Contracted : ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 20050919
Length of Service : 02 Yrs 02 Mths 12 D ys ( d oes not exclude lost time)     Lost Time:
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 33          Highest Rate/Rank: ENFN
Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance : 3.0 ( 4 ) Behavior : 2. 3 ( 4 ) OTA : 2. 78
Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214): NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, BATTLE "E" RIBBON, GWOT SERVICE MEDAL


Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Reason for Discharge

 Not dated:       Waiver for pre-service 1 Chart “C” offense on 20030527.

 20031022:        OIC NJP for viol UCMJ , Art 121: Larceny ( switching price tag at Navy Exchange ). Award: F OP $240.00 for 1 month ($115.00 suspended for 6 months), Rest/EPD 14 days (9 days suspended for 6 months).
        
20040406:        Medical entry: Reason for visit: referred for substance abuse evaluation—at work with alcohol on breath, 20040214.
         Diagnosis: No diagnosis V79.1
         Recommendation: Substance Abuse treatment indicated, recommended Impact course.
20050331:        Medical entry: Reason for visit: screening for Substance Abuse Rehabilitation Program.
         Diagnosis: AXIS I: 305.00 Alcohol Abuse (Sustained Full Remission).
         Recommendation: Schedule counseling with base Chaplain (family issues), DAPA to call and schedule an appointment for treatment, DAPA monitoring for 12 month(s), ASAM Level 2, Intensive Outpatient Treatment for Alcohol Abuse, Physical exam required 30 days before attending treatment.
20050420:        CO NJP for viol UCMJ , A rticle 92: Failure to obey lawful order or regulation and A rt 134: Drunkenness, incapacitation for performance of duties through prior wrongful indulgence in intoxicating liquor or any drug.
         Award: Rest/EPD 45 days (15 days Rest suspended) , reduction to E-2 (suspended) .
        
20050420:        Retention Warning for Art 92 (Failure to obey lawf ul order or regulation) and Art 134 (Drunkenness, incapacitation for performance of duties through prior wrongful indulgence in intoxicating liquor or any drug).
20050722:        C ompleted Level II Substance Abuse Rehabilitation Program . R equired to participate in a one year aftercare plan.

20050816:        Retention Warning for alcohol dependence.

20050908:        CO NJP for viol UCMJ , Art 134: Disorderly conduct, drunkenness , and Art 134: Threat, communicating.
         Award: Forfeiture of $692.25 for 2 months, reduction to E-2.
        

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY]

 Date Notified :                                        NOT FOUND IN RECORD
         Reason for Discharge
         Least Favorable Characterization Authorized :    

Date Applicant R esponded to N otification:                 NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Rights E lected at N otification :                           
Consult with Counsel                      
Obtain Copies of Documents                
Submit Statement(s) (date)                         
Administrative Board                      
GCMCA Review                               
Commanding Officer R ecommendation (date):       
S eparation Authority (date):                       
         Reason for discharge directed :            
         Characterization directed:                        
Date Applicant Discharged:                         20050919


Additional Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:     Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)      

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, 29 April 2005 until Present, Article 1910-152, SEPARATION BY REASON OF ALCOHOL REHABILITATION FAILURE.

B . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II , Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 92, Failure to obey order or re gulation; Article 121, Larceny; and Article 134, Threat, communicating.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701010

    Original file (ND0701010.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, because the Applicant’s service record did not contain copy of the administrative separation package and the documents submitted by the Applicant appeared regular on its face, the Board considered the Applicant’s discharge in light of a recommendation for an honorable discharge. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700785

    Original file (ND0700785.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “ PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT ” The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate. Summary of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700496

    Original file (ND0700496.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant contends that his discharge was inequitable due to inconsistencies in documentation of his alcohol dependency.The service records that the Board reviewed indicate the following: 1) The Applicant went to NJP 20041014 for drunk and disorderly conduct in Guam and damage to government property, 2) completed Alcohol Impact 20041104, 3) was diagnosed as alcohol dependent by a psychologist 20050222, 4) went to NJP on 20050224 for drunk and disorderlyconduct and assault on a commissioned...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700001

    Original file (ND0700001.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Complete Service Record: Complete Medical Record: Complete Discharge Package: Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge: Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge: Discussion Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. 20030418: NJP for violations of UCMJ: Article 134: Drunkenness Article 86: Unauthorized absence Elements of Discharge:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801020

    Original file (ND0801020.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe): DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801620

    Original file (ND0801620.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500815

    Original file (ND0500815.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. ONLY EVIDENCE IS SIGN-IN SHEETS AT AA MEETINGS.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19990921 - 20010111 ELS USNR...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700535

    Original file (ND0700535.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s service was marred by two retention warnings and the award of two nonjudicial punishments (NJP) for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 86 (Failure to go to appointed place of duty, Article 86 (Absent from appointed place of duty, and Article 134 (Drunkenness).An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700135

    Original file (ND0700135.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    To be administratively discharged via MILPERSMAN 1910-152 (alcohol rehabilitation failure) a member must first attend an intensive alcohol treatment program and subsequently be involved in a serious alcohol incident or violate his aftercare treatment plan. Date Applicant Responded to Notification:20030602 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board GCMCA review Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901605

    Original file (ND0901605.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined the awarded characterization of service was warranted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews :...