Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700953

Original file (ND0700953.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-FA, USN
ND07-00953

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070703 Characterization Received:

Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-140

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Applicant d oes not use illicit drugs and the witness falsely accused the Applicant .
                           2. Evidence was not sufficient for a Special Courts-Martial conviction

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .

Date: 20 080103             Location: Washington D.C          R epresentation :

Discussion

Issue s 1 & 2: ( ). The Applicant implies that he does not use illicit drugs and that the witness falsely accused the Applicant of smoking marijuana . The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any credible evidence, to support his c ontention . The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case.

For the Applicant’s knowledge, his separation from the Naval Service was by reason of Pattern of Misconduct. The pattern was based on the finding of guilty for violation of Article 112a, (Wrongful use of controlled substance) at Special Courts-Martial, a retention warning, and one nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for violation of Article 92 (Failure to obey an order) and two specifications of Article 134, (Disorderly conduct, Drunkenness.) Violation of Articles 92 and 112a are considered serious offenses for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate .

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP)      20000203 - 20000209              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20000210      Years Contracted : ; Extension: Date of Discharge: 20021126
Length of Service : 2 Yrs 9 Mths 17 D ys    Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d : 15
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 62          Highest Rank /Rate : FN
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       NONE FOUND IN RECORD
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, ARMED FORCES EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL, OVERSEAS SERVICE RIBBON, MERITORIOUS UNIT COMMEMDATION RIBBON, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON.

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20020503:        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 92 – Failure to obey lawful general order, Art. 134 (2 specs) – Disorderly conduct, drunkenness.
         Awarded - FOP ($650.00) for (2 months); RIR (E-2); Restr for (45 days); Extra duties (45 days).

20020503 :        Retention Warning for CO’s NJP .

20020913 :        S PCM -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a – Wrongful use of Marijuana .
         Awarded - FOP ( $ 700.00 ) for ( 1 months); RIR ( E-1 ); Confinement (15 days) .

Discharge Process

Date Notified:                                       20020919
Reason for Discharge:     -
         -

Least Favorable Characterization:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20020919
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)
         Administrative Board
         GCMCA review

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20021003 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMNAVPERSCOM ( 20021024 )
Reason for discharge directed: -
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       20021126

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe) Courts-Martial review request dated 20040315

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 August 2002 until 25 January 2004, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600), SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article s 92 and 112a.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700142

Original file (MD0700142.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20000405 - 20000827 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20000828Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20030103 Length of Service: 02 Yrs 04Mths06 DysLost Time: 10 Days UA: 9Days Confined: Education Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 53MOS:3531Highest Rank:Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): N/A/N/A Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL Medical/Service Record Entries Related to...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701044

Original file (ND0701044.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s service was marred by one retention warning and the award of two nonjudicial punishments (NJP) for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 86 (Unauthorized absence), Article 92 (Disobey a lawful order), and Article 92 (Dereliction of duty). After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700897

Original file (ND0700897.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s service was marred by three retention warnings and three nonjudicial punishments (NJP) for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 86 (Unauthorized absence), Article 92 (Failure to obey a lawful order), and Article 111 (Drunken operation of a vehicle. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701177

Original file (ND0701177.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Date: 20080124Location:Washington D.C Representation: Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred by three nonjudicial punishment for a violation of the Uniform Code of Military...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801651

Original file (MD0801651.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

- 20021218: For Personality Disorder - 20030116: For Personality Disorder Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: - Record of Trial from 20 May 2003 ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700968

Original file (MD0700968.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “ UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS ” The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate. Summary...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700506

Original file (MD0700506.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Recommendation on Separation: BY Recommendation on Characterization: BY Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20030401)SJA review (date): (20030711) Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, 3D MARINE DIVISION (20030715) Basis for discharge directed: DUE TO: Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 2030729 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service and/or Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300727

Original file (ND1300727.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700857

Original file (MD0700857.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred by one retention warning, one nonjudicial punishment for a violation of UCMJ Article 92 (Failure to obey an order or regulation) and Article 108 (Destruction of government property), and one Summary Court Martial finding of guilty for two specifications of Article 112a (Wrongful use of controlled substance). After a...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700265

Original file (MD0700265.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

19930423: NJP imposed and suspended on 19930409 for a period of 6 months vacated.19930803: CO's NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 19930824 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (19930823) SJA review (date): (19930830) Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, 1 ST Marine Division (19930910) Basis for discharge directed: DUE TO: Characterization directed: Date...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700953

Similar Decisions