Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700105
Original file (ND0700105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-AN, USN
ND07-00105
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20061031   Characterization received:
Narrative Reason: IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL      Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-106

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Entrapped into committing offense
                           2. Inadequate representation
                           3. Post-service conduct

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .     
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL .
Date: 20 071011                    Location: Washington D.C.      

Discussion

Issue 1 ( ). The Applicant contends that he was pressured for six weeks by an, unbeknownst to him, cooperating witness who finally broke down his resistance to attempting to purchase Ecstacy. The record demonstrates that the Applicant had the opportunity to defend himself at trial by court-martial, but chose to not do so. In so choosing, the record also demonstrates that the Applicant had the opportunity to review the evidence against him, discuss that evidence and his options with detailed defense counsel, and admitted guilt to the charge against him in order to avoid such a trial. The Applicant explicitly acknowledged the likelihood and consequences of an administrative discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions. The Applicant’s uncorroborated assertions of entrapment do not overcome the plain evidence of record that demonstrate that the his discharge was proper and equitable.

Issue 2 ( ). The Applicant contends that he was inadequately represented, although he does not indicate in what manner his representation was inadequate. This contention is in direct conflict with his written acknowledgement, made at the time he requested administrative separation in lieu of trial by court-martial, that he was satisfied with his counsel in all respects. Nothing in the record provides a scintilla of evidence suggesting that the Applicant’s counsel did not competently act in his best interests.

Issue 3 ( ). There is credible evidence in the record, to include his own admission, that the Applicant abused illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no impropriety or inequity after a review of Applicant’s case. There is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that could be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of service.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (DEP)      20020226 - 20020625              Active:         
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20020626      Years Contracted : ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 20051019
Length of Service : 03 Yrs 03 Mths 24 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 35          Highest Rank /Rate : AN
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 2 . 7 ( 4 )       Behavior: 2. 5 ( 4 )                   OTA: 2.9 1
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, ARMED FORCES EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL, GWOT SERVICE MEDAL, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON (2), OVERSEAS SERVICE RIBBON (2)

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 20031107 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 92 – Failure to obey order or regulation; viol UCMJ Art. 134 – Disorderly conduct, drunkenness; viol UCMJ Art. 108 – Destruction of government property; viol UCMJ Art. 107 – False official statement .
         Awarded - FOP ( $ 300.00 ) for ( 2 months); RIR ( E-1 ) suspended for 6 months ; Restr for ( 60 days ) .
Discharge Process
Charge(s) Preferred: 20050901
Charge(s) and Specification(s): Article 80 : Attempt to wrongfully possess one pill of Ecstasy on or about 20050813.
        
Date Applicant Submitted SILT request:            20050926
         Consulted with or Waived Counsel:                
         Acknowledged Understanding Elements:    
         Acknowledged Guilt to:                     Article(s) 80             BCD/DD authorized for offense(s)        
         Acknowledged Consequences of OTH:       
         Type of Characterization Requested:     

Separation Authority (date):     COMMAND ER, CARRIER STRIKE GROUP FIVE ( 2005100 6 )
          Reason for Discharge directed:           
         Characterization directed:                        
Date Applicant Discharged :                         20051019

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative: Other Documentation (Describe)      

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective 31 May 2005 and Present, Article 1910-106, SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV , Para 403m(7)(b), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes a punitive discharge as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article s 80 , Attempts and 112a, Wrongful use, possession, etc. of controlled substances .
Recorder’s Signature: _____________________________________________

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701058

    Original file (MD0701058.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the Applicant’s post service conduct did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700353

    Original file (MD0700353.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that . Discharge Process Charge(s) Preferred: 19970605 Charge(s) and Specification(s):Article 134: Adultery Date Applicant Submitted SILT request: 19970612 Consulted with or Waived Counsel: Acknowledged Understanding Elements: Acknowledged Guilt to: Article(s) 134 BCD/DD authorized for...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701135

    Original file (MD0701135.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Record of service. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700931

    Original file (MD0700931.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19930903 - 19940801 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19940802Years Contracted:4; Extension: Date of Discharge:19980814Length of Service: 04 Yrs 00Mths13 DysLost Time:Days UA: NONE Days Confined: 13Education...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800699

    Original file (ND0800699.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant should be aware post service conduct alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of the discharge.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Pertinent...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600598

    Original file (ND0600598.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s service was marred by nonjudicial punishment for failing to go to his appointed place of duty due to a prior overindulgence of alcohol, attempting to steal merchandise from a vending machine, and failing to report a fellow Sailor’s theft of, and damage to, an automobile, in violation of Articles 80, 86 and 92 of the UCMJ; an administrative discharge board recommendation for separation with a characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions; his admission...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701013

    Original file (MD0701013.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    19930427 Consulted with or Waived Counsel: Acknowledged Understanding Elements: Acknowledged Guilt to: Article(s) 86, 92 BCD/DD authorized for offense(s) YES, Article 92 Acknowledged Consequences of OTH: Type of Characterization Requested: Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (19930428) Separation Authority (date): COMMANDER, 2D MARINE DIVISION (19930505) Reason for Discharge directed: Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 19930525 Types of Documents Submitted by...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700484

    Original file (MD0700484.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19990313 - 19990517Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19990518Years Contracted:Date of Discharge:20020630 Length of Service: 03 Yrs 01Mths13 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level: Age at...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700151

    Original file (ND0700151.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred byone nonjudicial punishment for violates the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 86 [Unauthorized Absence (two specifications)], Article 91 (Failure to obey lawful order), and Article 134 (Alter public Record).Additionally, the record reflects the Applicant violated the UCMJ, Article 86 [Unauthorized...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700493

    Original file (ND0700493.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Applicant’s Issues:1.Request change of RE Code to reenlist in Army2. Further, the Applicant's misconduct is clearly documented. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20030926 -...