Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700934
Original file (MD0700934.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-LCPL, USMC
MD07-00934
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20060626   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT-DRUG ABUSE Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Employment opportunities.
                           2. Poor decision and i mmaturity.
                           3. Post service.

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT-DRUG ABUSE.

Date: 20 08010 3            Location: Washington D.C.         Representation :

Discussion

 Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 (Equity). T he Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. T he Applicant contends that h is problems were attributed to poor decision making and immaturity. While he may feel that this was the underlying cause of misconduct, the record clearly reflects willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. A under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by one discharge warning and one nonjudicial punishment for a violation of UCMJ Article 112a. A v iolation of UCMJ Article 112a is considered a serious offense for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.

Issue 3 (Equity). The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge, may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant provided no documentation other than the personal statement for post-service accomplishments. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing than those provided. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a verifiable employment record, documentation of community service, evidence of a rug free lifestyle, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found that
Summary of Service

 Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     19900619 - 19900814              19900815 – 19931129      HON
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 199 31130      Years Contracted : 4 ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 19950505
Length of Service : 0 1 Yrs 0 6 Mths   06 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level: 12       Age at Enlistment: 24     AFQT: 53          MOS: 0411      Highest Rank: SGT
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      4.8 ( 10 ) / 4.8 ( 10 )        
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): GCM, SSDR, NDSM, MUC x 2, SASM, CERT COMM x 2, RIFLE MM


Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 19900618:        Applicant signed Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.

19920723 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for failing to maintain authorized alternate maximum weight limit off 220 pounds. Discharge warning issued.

19950405 :         NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 19950331 , tested positive for cocaine.

19950410 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a (cocaine).
         Awarded - FOP ($ 636 ) for ( 1 month) (suspended for 3 months) ; RIR ( E-4 ).

19950413 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for wrongful use of a controlled substance. Discharge warning issued.

Discharge Process

 Date Notified:   19950420
Basis for Discharge:      DUE TO
        
Least Favorable Characterization:       
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:   

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  19950420
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                      

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 19950420 )
SJA review (date):       ( 19950426 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDING GENERAL, MARINE CORPS LOGISTICS BASE, ALBANY ( 19950501 )
Basis for discharge directed:   DUE TO
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       19950505






Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6210, Misconduct , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, ( MCO P1900.16D), effective 27 Jun 89 until 17 Aug 95.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801086

    Original file (ND0801086.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee clemency will be granted, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct justifies clemency. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service and Medical Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found clemency was not warranted and the sentence awarded the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200686

    Original file (ND1200686.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his discharge was based on an isolated incident.2. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701098

    Original file (ND0701098.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    19950428: Applicant discharged. Discharge Process Date Notified: 19950404Reason for Discharge:--Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification:19950404Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative BoardCommanding Officer Recommendation (date): (19950407)Separation Authority (date): BUPERS (19950420)Reason for discharge directed: - Characterization directed: Date Applicant...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701065

    Original file (MD0701065.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the Applicant’s post service conduct did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700655

    Original file (MD0700655.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Narrative reason and characterization of service are not proper per service regulations 3. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700854

    Original file (MD0700854.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Civil charges later dropped for lack of evidence DecisionBy a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT Date:20071220Location:Washington D.C.Representation: Discussion Issue 1: ().A Marine may be separated for a commission of a serious military or civilian offense when the specific circumstances of the offense warrant separation. 20051031: Administrative Separation Proceeding are withdrawn 20051105: Applicant notified of Administrative Separation...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800534

    Original file (MD0800534.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19900326– 19900626Active: 19900627 – 19941031 HON Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19941101Period of enlistment:3 Years MonthsDate of Discharge:19960410Length of Service: 01 Yrs 05 Mths10 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:22AFQT: 67MOS: 0351Highest Rank: CPLProficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): 4.8(2) / 4.8(2)Awards and Decorations...

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1401282

    Original file (MD1401282.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 8 May 2009, an Administrative Separation Board determined that a preponderance of evidence proved the Applicant’s pattern of misconduct, and recommended the Applicant be separated from the Marine Corps with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. ...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001552

    Original file (MD1001552.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Of note in the Applicant’s separation process, the Applicant’s proficiency and conduct markings were substantially above average, and he received markings of 4.8/4.8 just prior to his separation proceedings.The characterization of service at discharge is recognition of a Marine’s performance and conduct throughout a period of enlistment and is not necessarily dependent upon the narrative reason for separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400115

    Original file (ND1400115.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:HUMANITARIAN REASONS OR Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19990226 - 19990517Active:19990518 - 2003051520030516 - 20071015 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20071016Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20130815Highest Rank/Rate:FCCSLength of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 0 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT:...