Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801086
Original file (ND0801086.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-ADAR, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20080418
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 3640420

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP) 19860512 - 19860611                Active: 19860612 - 19920603 HON

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19920604     Period of E nlistment : Years Extension          Date of Discharge: 19970304
Length of Service : Y ear s M onth s 19 D a ys       Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 63
Highest Rank /Rate :       AD2       Evaluation M arks: Performance:    4.0 ( 4 )   Behavior: 4.0 ( 4 )         OTA: 4.00
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): Rifle Pistol

Periods of UA /C ONF : UA: 19950420 - 19950502 (13 days)
19950620 - 19950708 (19 days)
19950807 - 19960316 (220 days)
19960510 - 19970304 (295 days)

CONF: 19960316 - 19960507 (49 days)

NJP :
- 19920819 : Art icle 111 (Drunken driving)
Awarded : Susp ended :

S CM : CC:

SPCM:
- 19960502 :       Art icle 86 (U A)
                  - Specification 1: 19950420 - 19950503 (13 days)
                  - Specification 2: 19950620 - 19950709 (19 days)
                  - Specification 3: 19950807 - 19960316 (220 days)
         Article 112a ( Drug use, w rongful use of cocaine)
          Sentence : BCD; RIR to E1; FOP $500 per month for 3 months; confined for 75 days .

Retention Warnings:
- 19920819 : For NJP for violation of NJP Article 111 (Drunk driving)

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:         Service/ Medical Record:                  Other Records:

         -Record of trial dated 2 May 1996.




Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:        From Representat ion :    From Congress m ember :

Other Documentation (Describe) :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 14, effective 3 October 96 until
14 December 1998, Article 3640420, DISCHARGE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE
OF COURT-MARTIAL

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

D . The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 and 112a .




DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Military benefits.
2. Isolated incident.
3 . Record of service.
4. Mitigating circumstances.
5. Post-service conduct.

Decision

Date: 20 08 1121             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall COURT MARTIAL .
Discussion

 : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum , specifically the paragraph concerning , regarding .

: ( ) . The Applicant contends he is entitled to clemency due to his record of service, mitigating circumstances which contributed to his misconduct (specifically marital and financial problems) , and because his misconduct was an isolated incident in nine years of service. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service was marred by one NJP and a retention warning for a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Articl e 111 ( D runken driving). The Applicant was subsequently found guilty by a SPC M for violation of Article 86 ( U nauthorized absence) for a total of more than 250 days, and Article 112a ( Drug use, w rongful use of a controlled substance). These are considered serious violations which resulted in the Applicant being awarded a “Bad Conduct Discharge”.

In response to the Applicant’s clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency which reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB carefully reviewed the Applicants record of service and considered the marital and financial problems he was facing at the time of his misconduct. The NDRB determined clemency founded on the length and character of the Applicant’s military service, including circumstances the Applicant feels mitigated his misconduct, would be inappropriate.

 : ( ) . The Applicant contends clemency is warranted in his case due to post-service conduct. T he NDRB is authorized to consid er post-service factors in consideration if a case warrants clemency . Supporting documentation to help support post service clemency includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record ; documentation of ongoing community or church service ; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities ; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card company’s, or other financial institutions; character witness statements; and particularly for cases involving drug abuse, documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee clemency will be granted, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct justifies clemency . The NDRB determined the Applicant did not provide sufficient grounds to merit clemency at this time. The Applicant submitted evidence of long-term employment and a character reference with his DD-293 Application. While this does indicate some degree of good post-service conduct, the NDRB determined this does not meet the high standard required to warrant clemency.

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service and Medical Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found clemency was not warranted and the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offense s he committed.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.
Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable Discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.
Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700934

    Original file (MD0700934.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Date:20080103Location:Washington D.C.Representation: Discussion Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant’s service was marred by one discharge warning and one nonjudicial punishment for a violation of UCMJ Article 112a. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700467

    Original file (ND0700467.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discussion Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. After a thorough review of all available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note an administrative...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001411

    Original file (ND1001411.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to Navy Regulations, when a member is separated upon expiration of enlistment or fulfillment of obligated service, the service will be characterized as Honorable unless General (Under Honorable Conditions ) is warranted on the basis of the enlisted Performance Evaluation System. Because relief is granted based on impropriety discovered by the NDRB, the Applicant’s issues will not be addressed.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100350

    Original file (ND1100350.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant contends he warrants an upgrade based on his in-service conduct. Partial relief warranted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found the discharge was proper and equitable at the time of the discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900180

    Original file (ND0900180.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant contends he is entitled to clemency because the punishment adjudged was too harsh for his misconduct. The NDRB determined the awarded discharge characterization was within the parameters established by the Navy for the Article 86 violation in question and clemency was not warranted.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service and Medical Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600191

    Original file (ND0600191.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Please correct the enlistment code so I can reenlist in the military.”Additional issues submitted by Applicant’s counsel/representative (Disabled American Veterans): “Dear Chairperson: After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of evidence...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900428

    Original file (MD0900428.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined clemency is not warranted based on the member’s record of service. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service and Medical Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the sentence awarded the Applicant at her court-martial was appropriate for the offensesshe committed, but she should receive an upgrade to her discharge as an act of clemency based on post service...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000543

    Original file (MD1000543.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 1105,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700413

    Original file (ND0700413.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board voted 5-0 that the characterization of service shall change to Honorable.The Commander of USS SACRAMENTO (AOE 1) chose to discharge the Applicant by recommending the Applicant’s discharge to BUPERS by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure with a service characterization of honorable. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100860

    Original file (ND1100860.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of...