Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701098

Original file (ND0701098.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-FCSN, USN
ND07-01098

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070808 Characterization Received:

Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT Authority: MILPERSMAN 3630600

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Re ason change :

Applicant’s Issues:       1. Better employment opportunities.
                           2. Isolated incident.
                           3. Post Service – College (transcripts 126 credit hours) , employed, family, Army National Guard                                     Honorable discharge , local and state police records checks, and four letters of recommendation.

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .

Date: 20 08 0117             Location: Washington D.C         R epresentation :

Discussion

: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 ( ): The Applicant stated that his discharge was based on one isolated incident . Although this may have been the action which forced the command to process the Applicant for administrative discharge he was processed properly for both misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to drug abuse. T he summary of service clearly documents the Applicant ’s two NJPs for violations of UCMJ Article s 92 (failure to obey) and 112a (wrongful use of a controlled substance) . Each violation of Articles 92 and 112a compose the “co mmission of a serious offense” which is punishable by a dishonorable discharge and up to 5 years of imprisonment if adjudicated by a Courts Martial. The commission of a serious offense is the actual basis for discharge in this case. Despite a servicemember’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses warrant separation from the n aval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline . The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of service, reflects the Applicant’s willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade in the characterization of service.

Issue 3 ( ): The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the re characterization of a discharge . However, there is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the servi ce. Normally, to permit relief a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. O utstanding post-service conduct to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant provided transcripts documenting 126 hours of college credit, and Honorable discharge certificate from the Minnesota National Guard, a local and state police records check, four letters of recommendation, along with his statement of employment to the board as doc umentation of his post-service accomplishments. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing than those provided. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of a drug free lifestyle , a verifiable employment record, and doc umentation of community service . The Board applauds the Applicants achievements in civilian life, never-the-less this does not mitigate the misconduct which resulted in the Applicant’s discharge and characterization of his service .

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: US N R (DEP) 19911127 - 19920825
Reserve:         Minnesota National Guard 03 Yrs 08 Mths 02 Days - HON
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19920826               Years Contracted : 4       Extension: 24 months      Date of Discharge: 19950428
Length of Service : 02 Yrs 08 Mths 03 D ys                                                                Lost Time :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment: 18     AFQT: 84          Highest Rank /Rate : FCSN
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 3.0 ( 3 )      Behavior: 3.0 ( 3 )                 OTA: 3.07 (3)
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NDSM

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

19940609:        Applicant reported for duty aboard USS TARAWA (LHA 1).

19941020:        NJP – Viol ation of UCMJ Art icle 92 (failure to obey, stud in tongue)
         Awarded - FOP ($ 200/month for one month ).

19950331:        NJP – Viol ation of UCMJ Art icle 112a (wrongful use of a controlled substance , methamphetamine )
         Awarded - FOP ($ 525/month for two months); Restr ( 45 days); Extra duties ( 45 days).

19950428:        Applicant discharged.

Discharge Process

Date Notified:                                       19950404
Reason for Discharge:     -
         -

Least Favorable Characterization:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  19950404
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)
         Administrative Board

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 19950407 )
Separation Authority (date):     BUPERS ( 19950420 )
Reason for discharge directed: -
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       19950428

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective 22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article s 92 and 112a .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901323

Original file (MD0901323.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found clemency was not warranted and the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offenseshe committed. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701251

Original file (ND0701251.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800050

Original file (ND0800050.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Post Service – Finished three trade schools, one year from completing Bachelors degree, no criminal record (no docs) Decision Date: 20080207Location: Washington D.C Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT - DRUG ABUSE.Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Board determined that...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800208

Original file (ND0800208.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Awarded - ,,, and Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800471

Original file (ND0800471.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: /HONORABLE Narrative Reason change: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19910708 - 19911015 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19911016Period of enlistment:4 Years Date of Discharge:19941208Length of Service: 03 Yrs 01Mths23 DysEducation Level: 12Age at Enlistment:20AFQT: 74Highest Rank/Rate:ATAAEvaluation marks:Performance: 3.9 (3) Behavior:3.7 (3)OTA: 3.93 (3)Awards and Decorations (per DD...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700936

Original file (MD0700936.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Post Service – employed and volunteer service Personal Appearance Hearings NDRB Documentary Review Conducted (date): 20041008NDRB Documentary Review Docket Number: MD04-00679NDRB Documentary Review Findings: 5-0 no change Applicant Testified: YesApplicant Available for Questions: YesWitnesses: None Observers: NoneDate: 20080312Location: Washington D.C Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.Discussion : either which the...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901654

Original file (MD0901654.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

In the Applicant’s administrative separation memorandum, the commanding general clearly notes that he considered the Applicant’s pre-service drug waiver on the issue of separation, but not in determining the characterization of service. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800346

Original file (ND0800346.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900797

Original file (MD0900797.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The NDRB determined the characterization of service received, Bad Conduct Discharge, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violation involved, and based on the limited post-service documentation provided clemency would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service and Medical Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800573

Original file (ND0800573.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20040722 - 20040729 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20040730Period of enlistment:4 YearsDate of Discharge:20051110Length of Service: Yrs Mths10 DysEducation Level: 12Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 82Highest Rank/Rate:AZANEvaluation marks:Performance: 4.0 (3) Behavior:2.0 (3)OTA: 2.94 (3)Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):,,,and NJP:20050907: Violation...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701098

Similar Decisions