Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800534
Original file (MD0800534.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-LCPL, USMC
        
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20071226     
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN (separation in lieu of trail by court-martial)

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     19900326 – 19900626      Active: 19900627 – 19941031 HON         
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19941101               Period of enlistment : 3 Years Months   Date of Discharge: 19960410
Length of Service : 01 Yrs 05 Mths 10 D ys          Education Level:         Age at Enlistment: 22     AFQT: 67
MOS: 0351        Highest Rank: CPL
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): 4.8 (2) / 4.8 (2)    
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): GCM, CAR, NMCAM, SSDR x 2, KLM, SASM x 2, NDSM, NUC, LOA x 2, Rifle EX , Pistol SS

Periods of UA / CONF : 11 / 0

NJPs :     NONE

6105 Counseling :


Types of Documents Submitted

 Related to Military Service:      DD 214:          Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:             From Representat ion :              From Member of Congress:
Other Documentation (Describe)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. One incident in service.
2. Record of service.
3. Post service (employed as a police officer, college education, family).

Decision


 Date: 20 08 0509 Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

Issue s 1-2 (Equity). The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. During Board reviews the government is presumed to conduct its affairs with regularity unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant .

The NDRB review ed all of the available records , supporting documents, facts, e lements of d ischarge , evidence submitted by the Applicant , and circumstances unique to this case . A particular circumstance of interest was the Applicant’s outstanding service record prior to the one incident in question. Additionally, it was presumed the Applicant’s actions were in line with c onduct and training at his unit. During this timeframe, there was a crackdown on this type of “training” and the Applicant may have been caught up in this crackdown. Although still holding the Applicant responsible for his actions, the NDRB concluded there was an i nequity in the Applicant’s discharge action and therefore an upgrade to General (Under Honorable Conditions) is warranted.

Issue 3 (Equity). The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge, may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, good conduct, or favorable endorsements in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant provided no documentation of post service accomplishments other than his own statement. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of a verifiable and continuous employment record, evidence of continuing educational pursuits, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board determined the statements alone provided by the Applicant concerning post service conduct did not mitigate the circumstances that resulted in the characterization of discharge. As a result the Board determined an change was not warranted.

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found










Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6419, SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 August 1995 until 31 August 2001.

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article (s) 92, 93 .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(b), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
 Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400115

    Original file (ND1400115.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:HUMANITARIAN REASONS OR Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19990226 - 19990517Active:19990518 - 2003051520030516 - 20071015 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20071016Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20130815Highest Rank/Rate:FCCSLength of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 0 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200686

    Original file (ND1200686.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his discharge was based on an isolated incident.2. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entriesand discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700934

    Original file (MD0700934.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Date:20080103Location:Washington D.C.Representation: Discussion Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant’s service was marred by one discharge warning and one nonjudicial punishment for a violation of UCMJ Article 112a. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700854

    Original file (MD0700854.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Civil charges later dropped for lack of evidence DecisionBy a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT Date:20071220Location:Washington D.C.Representation: Discussion Issue 1: ().A Marine may be separated for a commission of a serious military or civilian offense when the specific circumstances of the offense warrant separation. 20051031: Administrative Separation Proceeding are withdrawn 20051105: Applicant notified of Administrative Separation...

  • USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1401282

    Original file (MD1401282.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 8 May 2009, an Administrative Separation Board determined that a preponderance of evidence proved the Applicant’s pattern of misconduct, and recommended the Applicant be separated from the Marine Corps with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801364

    Original file (ND0801364.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined to change the Narrative Reason for Separation would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800485

    Original file (MD0800485.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)Active: 19910604 – 19951003 HON Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19951004Period of enlistment:NFIRDate of Discharge:20030612Length of Service: 10 Yrs 04 Mths 04 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:22AFQT: 58MOS: 0121Highest Rank: SGTFitness reports: Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): 4.8 / 4.7Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):GCM,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902464

    Original file (MD0902464.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20001030 - 20010813Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20010814Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20051202Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)19 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:49MOS: 0311Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000245

    Original file (MD1000245.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. As such, Applicant seeks correction to his narrative reason for separation and the corresponding characterization of service and re-enlistment code from the Marine Corps.The NDRB reviewed the Applicant’s issues and the discharge process. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1002329

    Original file (ND1002329.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL...