Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601107
Original file (MD0601107.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-PFC, USMC
MD06-01107

 Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request :

Application Received:                               20 060815
Narrative Reason for Separation:                          
Character of Service:                               
Discharge Authority :                                MARCORSEPMAN 6203.2
Last Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:       SACO SO I TRNG CMD CAMLEJ NC

Applicant’s Request:
          Narrative Reason change to:               NONE REQUESTED      
         Characterization chang e to:               
         Review Requested :                          
Representation:                                             


Decision:

Date of Decision:                                            20070706
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:                                    YES
 Complete Medical Record:                           YES
Complete Discharge Package:                        YES
Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:     
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:         EQUITABLE

 By a vote of the Characterization shall UNCHARACTERIZED
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall remain CONDITION NOT A DISABILITY
Applicant’s Issues, as summarized by the Board:
 1. Change re-enlistment code.
2. To be able to reenlist.
3. Characterization of service is inequitable.


Summary of Service :

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMC R (DEP)                               20000511 - 200 01 016
Active: NONE
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment:                                 200 0 1017
Years Contracted :                                   ;      
Date of Discharge:                                  20010713
Length of Service:                                  00 Yrs 08 Mos 27 Days Does not exclude lost time, if any.
Time Lost During This Period:                     
Days Unauthorized Absence:                              
Days Confinement:                                        

Education Level:                                   
Age at this Enlistment:                                    
AFQT:                                                 32
MOS:                                                   9900
Highest Rate/Rank:                                   PFC

Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
 P roficiency :                                         4. 1 ( 2 )
Conduct :                                              4. 1 ( 2 )

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214):
R I FLE EXPERT BADGE



Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation

20010201:        Counseled concerning the following deficiency: your diagnosed physical condition not a disability: knee injury and ankle injury. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, and disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

20010530:        Counseled concerning the following deficiency: your deliberate concealment of a pre-existing condition of lower extremity pain following exercise. Fraudulent enlist ment i n the Marine Corps as a Private and received payment under the enlistment.



Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation

 20010108:        Applicant on light duty for 30 days.
20010212:        Podiatry consult: Applicant states he was seen by podiatry 2 years ago for foot pain.

20010304:        Camp Geiger Sports Medicine Clinic: Dr. notes that Applicant has had these pains all of his life. States Applicant did not say anything about his foot braces or his lifelong ankle and leg pain upon enlistment.

20010306:        Applicant on light duty for 30 days.

 2001040 9 :        Applicant waived Physical Evaluation Board.

20010409:        Naval Hospital, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. Applicant seen for follow up. Underwent compartmental pressure test on 200104 05 which confirmed diagnosis of exercise induced compartment syndrome. Applicant reports B lower extremity pain with exercise (running) for entire life (EPTE). Not mentioned on entrance physical. Desires administrative separation. Refuses further treatment for same after discussion of treatment options.
         Assessment: Exercise induced compartment syndrome, EPTE.
         Plan: PEB waiver signed after lengthy counseling.
         Applicant will be recommended for administrative separation.
         Limited duty until discharged.
         Administrative separation letter written.
20010503:        Commanding Officer, Naval Hospital, Camp Lejeune letter recommending separation of Applicant due to fraudulent enlistment and Exercise Induced Compartment Syndrome.


Elements of Discharge: [ IN VOLUNTARY]

Discharge Process :                                  Notification Procedure
Date Notified :                                        20010410      
Basis for Discharge :                                PHYSICAL CONDITION NOT A DISABILITY
Le ast Favorable Characterization:                          UNCHARACTERIZED
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation :    UNCHARACTERIZED
Record Supports Narrative Reason :                          YES
Date Applicant R esponded to N otification:                 20010410      
Rights E lected at N otification :
Consult with Counsel                       WAIVED
Administrative Board                       WAIVED
Obtain Copies                              ELECTED
Submit Statement(s) (date)                          WAIVED

 Re commendation of Commanding Officer (date):     PHYSICAL CONDITION NOT A DISABILITY (20010607)
SJA review (date):                                        
Discharge directed by (date):     COMMANDING OFFICER, SCHOOL OF INFRANTRY, TRAINING COMMAND, CAMP LEJEUNE ( 20010712 )
Narrative reason directed :                                  
Characterization directed:                                 
Date Applicant Discharged:                         20010713


Additional Information Considered by Board

 Type of d ocumentation submitted by t he Applicant and considered by the Board
        Document Type                                        #Pages
 Related to Period of Service Under Review :
          Service/Medical Record :                              2
         Other Period of Service:                                    0
Related to Post-Service Period:
          Community Service :                                   0
         Education :                                           0
         Employment :                                          0
         Health /Medical :                                       0
         Character Statements:                               0
         Criminal Records Checks:                                    0
         Additional Statements from Applicant:             0
Other Documentation (Describe Below)                      0

Total Number of Pages:                              2

D escription of Other Documentation:     

Applicant’s Issues, as summarized by the Board:
 1. Change re-enlistment code.
2. To be able to reenlist.
3. Characterization of service is inequitable.
Issues 1 and 2: The Board determined that these Issues were not issues which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding this issue.

Decisional Issues:
 The Board accepted Issue 3 for consideration .

Issue 3 ( Equity ). By regulation, members notified of intended recommendation for discharge within the first 180 days of enlistment are eligible for an uncharacterized or entry-level separation characterization of service. Unless there were unusual circumstances regarding a service member’s performance or conduct that would merit an honorable characterization, an uncharacterized discharge is generally considered the most appropriate characterization of a member’s service. The Applicant's service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during his less than 6 months in the military prior to notification of separation to warrant a change of discharge to honorable. T he Applicant’s service was marred by one retention warning and a counseling entry notifying the Applicant that he had committed a fraudulent enlistment. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Marine Corps. Therefore the Board found his un characterized characterization appropriate. Relief denied.

The Applicant should be aware that, with respect to non - service-related administrative matters, i.e., VA benefits, educational pursuits, and especially civilian employment, an uncharacterized separation is considered the equivalent of an honorable or general (under honorable conditions) discharge.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.

Minority Opinion

 None.
Pertinent Regulation/Law
A. Paragraph 6203, CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16 F ), effective 30 May 2001 until present. .
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 83, Fraudulent enlistment, appointment, or separation.




ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant
Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/ RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                                    Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                     Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                     720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600220

    Original file (MD0600220.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The subject named Marine’s (Applicant) evaluation and treatment plan had been reviewed by by Lt L_, Senior Medical Officer, Camp Geiger Branch Medical Clinic.Private G_ (Applicant) is a 20-year-old male with Lumbar Back Strain and Thoracic Back Strain.Private G_ (Applicant) is recommended for administrative separation for Lumbar Back Strain and Thoracic Back Strain which existed prior to entry (EPTE) and was not revealed on the military entrance physical examination at MEPS. The factual...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00731

    Original file (PD-2012-00731.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded exercise-induced compartment syndrome and decreased sensation and weakness lateral aspect right lower extremity (LE), status post (s/p) exercise syndrome release as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501 to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). RECOMMENDATION: The Board therefore recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability rating and separation determination: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Left Lower Extremity Exercise-Induced Compartment...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600327

    Original file (MD0600327.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. I’m Requesting my RE code be changed from RE 4 to the Best RE Code for Reenlistment.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Service 2)Twenty-one pages from Applicant’s service and medical records University Orthopedics Center evaluation, dtd June 4,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00363

    Original file (PD2011-00363.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    CI CONTENTION : “I was more disabled than the military rated me for and my leg conditions are more disabling. The NARSUM, dated 3 months prior to separation (9 months post-operative) stated the CI’s “foot and ankle ROM is normal with good strength in all planes bilaterally, and his compartments are soft.” The CI was taking no medications for the condition. No other conditions were service-connected with a compensable rating by the VA within 12 months of separation or contended by the CI.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01403

    Original file (PD2012 01403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB characterized his condition as “exercise-induced compartment syndrome”EICS and forwarded it to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.ThePEB adjudicated bilateral lower leg pain secondary to EICS as unfitting, rated 0%, citing the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals, and was medically separatedwiththat rating. The narrative summary (NARSUM) notes the CI had a lower leg pain that...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500314

    Original file (MD0500314.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to RE-1. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION 030425: Commanding Officer recommended the Applicant’s uncharacterized discharge by reason of fraudulent entry into the U.S. Marine Corps.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00440

    Original file (PD-2012-00440.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RATING COMPARISON: Service FPEB – Dated 20090417 Condition Code Left Leg Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Right Leg Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome Left Leg Chronic Compartment Syndrome Right Leg Chronic Compartment Syndrome Mild Exercise Induced Asthma Low Back Bilateral Pes Planus Bilateral Planter Fasciitis Atypical Non‐Cardiac Chest Pain 5099‐5003 Rating 10% 5099‐5003 10% 5099‐5003 5099‐5003 0% 0% Not Unfitting Not Unfitting Not Unfitting Not Unfitting Not Unfitting VA (2 Weeks Pre‐Separation)...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901034

    Original file (MD0901034.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. For the Applicant’s edification, per MCO P1900.16E, Chapter 1 Section 1004 (Characterization of Service), paragraph 5 (Uncharacterized Separations), an uncharacterized separation shall be considered as the equivalent of an honorable or general (under honorable conditions) characterization.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00864

    Original file (MD02-00864.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00864 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020603, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. 000919: Orthopedic Clinic, Naval Hospital Camp Lejeune, NC: medical evaluation of ankle sprain. The Applicant's Commanding Officer, therefore, was required to issue an uncharacterized discharge unless the Applicant's service record indicated unusual meritorious personal conduct or performance of military duty.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601162

    Original file (MD0601162.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    NONE Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 20040128: Applicant’s statement. Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 20030613: MEPS Report of Medical History signed by the Applicant declaring no recurrent back pain or any back problem. SEPARATION (20040128) SJA review (date): NOT FOUND IN RECORDSeparation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, MARINE CORPS RECRUIT DEPOT, SAN...