Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600777
Original file (MD0600777.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-PFC, USMCR
Docket No. MD06-00777

Applicant ’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20060516 . The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable . The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.
Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20070223 . After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant ’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of separation in lieu of trial by court -martial.

PART I - ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Decisional Issues
EQUITY – Post-service.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant ’s DD Form 214 (Member 4)
Meritorious Mast Certificate dated April 22, 1999
 Two Certificate s of Achievemen t from the Marine Corps Association , dated April 22, 1999
Character Reference ltr from L_ J. O_, United States Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Fresno, CA, dated March 24, 2006
 Character Reference ltr from B_ R_, Associate Chief Deputy Commissioner, Board of Parole Hearings, dated April 12, 2006
Character Reference ltr from D_ R_, Supervisor, Department of Corrections, dated March 28, 2006
Character Reference ltr from J_ W_, Captain, USMC Ret, dated April 18, 2006
Character Reference ltr from Maj K_ N_, US Army (RET), dated April 11, 2006
Character Reference ltr from J_ L_, Program Director, Turning Point of Central California, dated April 12, 2006
Certificate of Achievement, dated June 2, 2002

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: None
         Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19980608              Date of Discharge: 20030618

Length of Service (years, months, days):

 Active: 00 08 10 (Does not exclude lost time)
          Inactive: 0 3 10 28

Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: 6
         Confinement:              None

Age at Entry: 1 8

Years Contracted: 8

Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 41

Highest Rank: PFC                                    MOS: 2531

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4 . 2 ( 6 )                                 Conduct: 3.9 ( 6 )
Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as stated on the DD Form 214): Rifle Marksman Badge


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):
UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6419.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

981109:  Applicant reported for initial tour of active duty for training.

990423:  Applicant released from initial tour of active duty for training with an Honorable by reason of completion of required active service (USMCR) IADT.

991108:  Letter of unsatisfactory participation for 18-19 September and 1-3 October 1999 sent.

991205:  Applicant administratively reduced to Private for unsatisfactory participation in the SMCR with an effective date of 11 November 1998.

001225:  Applicant not recommended for promotion due to assignment to weight control.

010529:  Letter of unsatisfactory participation for 18, 19, 20 May 2001 sent.

xxxxxx:  Applicant not recommended for promotion for 1 st Quarter 2002 due to assignment to weight control.

xxxxxx:  Applicant not recommended for promotion for 2 nd Quarter 2002 due to unauthorized absences.

xxxxxx:  Applicant not recommended for promotion for 3 rd Quarter 2002 due to unauthorized absences.

xxxxxx:   Applicant not recommended for promotion for 4 th Quarter 2002 due to unauthorized absences.

021208:  Applicant not recommended for promotion for Jan 2003 due to unsatisfactory participation.
030324:  Commenced active duty. Activated in support of OEF.

030326 :  Applicant to unauthorized absence. [Extracted from DD Form 214, Block 29.]

030331 :  Applicant from unauthorized absence (6 days ). [Extracted from DD Form 214, Block 29.]

030613 :  GCMCA, Commander, Marine Corps Air Bases Western Area , directed the Applicant 's discharge under other than honorable conditions in lieu of trial by court-martial.


Service Record Book contains a partial Adm inistrative Discharge package.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 20030618 in lieu of trial by court-martial (A) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable ( B and C ). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs ( D ).
In the absence of a complete discharge package, the Board presumed regularity of governmental affairs. As such, the Board presumed that the Applicant requested discharge to escape trial by court-martial; that the Applicant had the elements of the offense(s) for which he was charged fully explained by counsel; that the Applicant admitted guilt to the offense(s); and that the Applicant had a complete understanding of the negative consequences of his actions. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no impropriety after a review of Applicant’s case. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6419, SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective
01 September 2001 until Present.

 B . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

D . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs .


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy    Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00305

    Original file (MD02-00305.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00305 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020117, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. We request equitable relief of the current discharge based on the good prior service of the member. 871231: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under conditions other than honorable by reason of conduct triable by courts-martial, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600779

    Original file (MD0600779.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 920714: Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0701.920721: Applicant from unauthorized absence at 1300.920816: GCMCA, Commanding Officer, 2d Force Service Support Group, approved the Applicant's request for discharge under other than honorable conditions in lieu of trial by court-martial.921014: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600678

    Original file (MD0600678.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s vote was 3-2that the discharge shall change to: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. The characterization of service shall be under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct.Service Record was missing elements of the Summary of Service. Subsequent to the Applicant’s unauthorized absence, he tested positive for illegal drug use on two occasions and requested discharge in lieu of court-marital for...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00566

    Original file (MD02-00566.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00566 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020318, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The discharge shall change to: UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL)/Conduct triable by courts-martial (request for discharge for the good of the service), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6419 .A general discharge is written “ UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS (GENERAL)” (See MCO P1900.16D, page 1-33, effective 27 Jun 89) An...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01148

    Original file (MD03-01148.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01148 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030618. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. 020204: GCMCA [Commander, Marine Corps Base, Quantico, VA] determined that Applicant had no potential for further service, that separation in lieu of trial by court-martial was in the best interest of the service, and directed discharge under other than...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500635

    Original file (MD0500635.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD05-00635 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050228. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00708

    Original file (MD03-00708.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-Pvt, USMC Docket No. The Applicant requested the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 85, Desertion; Article 86,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00576

    Original file (MD01-00576.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00576 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010327, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant is not eligible for further review by the Naval Discharge Review Board. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).A characterization of service of under other than...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00707

    Original file (MD02-00707.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00707 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020422, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 Seventeen pages from Applicant's service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600776

    Original file (MD0600776.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days, Article 92, failure to obey order/regulation or Article 112a, wrongful use of a controlled...