Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600779
Original file (MD0600779.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-LCpl, USMC
Docket No. MD06-00779

Applicant ’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20060516 . The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable . The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.
Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20070302. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB at the time of issuance. However, after consideration of the Applicant’s post-service accomplishments, the Board determined that partial relief was warranted on the basis of equity. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the discharge shall change to: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/ Conduct triable by courts-martial (request for discharge for the good of the service), authority: authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6419, Separation Code “JFF1. ”

PART I - ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Decisional Issues
EQUITY – Youth impaired ability to serve.
EQUITY – Post war complications impaired ability to serve.
 EQUITY – Discharge was the result of one major and a few minor incidents.
Documentation
In addition to the service and medical records, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant ’s DD Form 214 (US MC )
Applicant ’s DD Form 214 (Army/ARNG)
 Army Commendation Medal for service from February 25, 2004 thru February 23, 2005
Army Commendation Medal for service from April 27, 2002 thru May 11, 2002
 Army Achievement Medal for service from June 2, 2001 thru June 22, 2001
 Command Sergeant Major’s Training Excellence Award, dated June 22, 2001
Solider of the Year Certificate 2001
NCO Evaluation Report, dated January 20, 2006 (2 pages)
 Character Reference ltr from Chief S_ B_, undated
 Job/character r eference ltr from E_ C_, Employee Relations Manager, Spartanburg Steel Products, dated June 16, 2006
NCO Evaluation Report, dated January 4, 2005 (2 pages)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USMCR (DEP)    19890213 - 19890724       COG
         Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19890725              Date of Discharge: 19921014

Length of Service (years, months, days):

 Active: 0 3 0 2 2 0 (Does not exclude lost time )
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period :
         Unauthorized absence: 54 day s
         Confinement:              None

Age at Entry: 18
Years Contracted: 4
Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 41

Highest Rank: LCpl                                  MOS: 0481

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4 . 2 ( 13 )                                Conduct: 3.8 (1 4 )
Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as stated on the DD Form 214): Rifle Sharpshooter Badge, Sea Service Deployment Ribbon, National Defense Service Medal, Southwest Asia Service Medal w/1 Bronze star (Saudi Arabia/Iraq/Kuwait) , Kuwait Liberation Medal, Combat Action Ribbon, Navy Unit Commendation, Meritorious Unit Commendation


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):
UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Conduct triable by courts-martial (request for discharge for the good of the service), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6419.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

900921:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct ( S t eady decline in pro/con marks, a d irect result of poor performance, poor military appearance and failure to be at appointed place of duty resulting in being dropped from the rifle range.), necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
910930:  Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (Violation of Article 86, in that LCpl M_( Applicant ) reported to his unit , BTO Co 2 nd LSB , at approximately 1 630, 910927 vice 0645, 910927. ), necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
920108:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: UA from 0730, 911210 to 0900, 911211. Award: Forfeiture of $216.00 per month for 1 month, correctional custody for 7 days. Forfeiture suspended for 3 months. Not appealed.
920417:  Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0731.

920519:  Applicant declared a deserter.

 920602:  Applicant from unauthorized absence at 1130.
920714 :  Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0701 .
920721 :  Applicant from unauthorized absence at 1300 .
920816 :  GCMCA, Commanding Officer, 2d Force Service Support Group, approved the Applicant 's request for discharge under other than honorable conditions in lieu of trial by court-martial.

921014:  DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of conduct trialable by court martial (request of discharge for good of service), authority: MARCORSEPMAN par. 6419.

 Service Record Book contains a partial Adm inistrative Discharge package.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19921014 in lieu of trial by court-martial (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable at the time of issuance but that partial relief is warranted on the basis of post-service conduct (C and D). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (E).

The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. In the Applicant’s case, in the absence of a complete discharge package and without credible and substantial evidence to refute the Board’s presumption, the Board invoked the presumption of regularity. Specifically, the Board presumed that the Applicant requested discharge to escape trial by court-martial; that the Applicant had the elements of the offense(s) for which he was charged fully explained by counsel; that the Applicant admitted guilt to the offense(s); and that the Applicant had a complete understanding of the negative consequences of his actions.

The Board found that the Applicant’s post-service conduct was sufficiently creditable to warrant an upgrade to his characterization of service to general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant’s honorable service in the Army/ANG, to include honorable service in Operation Iraqi Freedom, and his employment history demonstrate that he possesses character that was not evident during his service as a Marine. His post-service actions show that his misconduct was most likely an isolated incident not reflective of his overall character. However, the Board found that the Applicant’s post-service conduct does not sufficiently mitigate his misconduct to warrant full relief in the form of an honorable discharge. Therefore, partial relief is granted.

The Applicant implies that his discharge is inequitable due to personal and familial problems as a result of his wartime service and his youth at the time of service. While he may feel that his immaturity and personal and familial complications was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief on this basis is not warranted.

The Applicant implies that his discharge is inequitable because it was the result of only one major and a few minor incidents. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violation of Article 86 of the UCMJ. The Applicant also received two retention warnings for deficiencies in his performance and conduct. Subsequent to the Applicant’s retention warnings and nonjudicial punishment, the Applicant violated Article 86 of the UCMJ on two occasions. One of the Applicant’s periods of unauthorized absence was in excess of 30 days and is, therefore, the commission of a serious offense. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the Marine Corps and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief on this basis is not warranted.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6419, SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16D), effective 27 Jun 89 until 17 Aug 95 .
B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004 , Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs .


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy    Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501569

    Original file (MD0501569.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION I seek to have my discharge upgraded to a general as a means of attaining all the privileges and right that are endowed under a general discharge.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Professional...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00564

    Original file (MD01-00564.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00564 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010323, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Age at Entry: 20 Years Contracted: 4 Education Level: 12 AFQT: 42 Highest Rank: LCpl Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Proficiency: 4.1 (5) Conduct: 4.3 (5) Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: None Days of Unauthorized Absence: 4920 Character, Narrative Reason, and...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00305

    Original file (MD02-00305.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00305 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020117, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. We request equitable relief of the current discharge based on the good prior service of the member. 871231: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under conditions other than honorable by reason of conduct triable by courts-martial, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00765

    Original file (MD01-00765.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00765 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010510, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies) Three pages from applicant's service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600397

    Original file (MD0600397.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19810114 - 19810707 COGActive: USMC 19810708 - 19840927 HON Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 19840928 Date of Discharge: 20010322 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 16 0522(Does not...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01099

    Original file (MD01-01099.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-01099 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010820, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600776

    Original file (MD0600776.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days, Article 92, failure to obey order/regulation or Article 112a, wrongful use of a controlled...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00392

    Original file (MD01-00392.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00392 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010208, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence for more than 30 days.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01257

    Original file (MD99-01257.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-01257 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990930, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00101

    Original file (MD04-00101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD04-00101 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031017. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USMCR(J) 970829 - 970914 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment:...