Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00707
Original file (MD02-00707.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT


ex-LCpl, USMC
Docket No. MD02-00707

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 020422, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. Subsequent to the application, the Applicant obtained representation by the Veterans of Foreign Wars.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030124. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6419.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


 Issues, as submitted

1. My discharge should be changed to honorable because it was based on one isolated incident in 3 1/2 years of faithful, dedicated, and honorable service with no adverse actions.
 I loved the Marine Corps and would've made it a career. Now I'm trying to become a Texas State Trooper. I need this upgraded in order to become a trooper.
 I was the Marine of the Quarter board, I was on the color guard for 1 1/2 yrs and I was the color sergeant.
2. Applicant indicated above requested that Veterans of Foreign Wars act as counsel concerning his application. His records were reviewed on 11/12/02 and the following comments are hereby submitted.
Based on the records we reviewed, it is obvious that a question of inequity and propriety issue exist. Awardement of a UOTH discharged for a DWI offense does not make any sense. We fully concur with his contention that his discharge be upgraded to Honorable. This was an outstanding marine.
We refer this case to the Board for the careful and compassionate consideration and request the Applicant's discharge be reviewed for upgrade to honorable.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant's DD Form 214
Seventeen pages from Applicant's service record

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                940801 - 950702  COG
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 950703               Date of Discharge: 981222
Length of Service (years, months, days):

          Active: 03 05 20
          Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4
Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 42

 Highest Rank: Cpl
Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 4.7 (8)                       Conduct: 4.7 (8)
Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, MM, Letter of Commendation (2), Letter of Appreciation, Letter of Recognition, GCM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 49
Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6419.
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

971231:  Applicant informed eligible but not recommended for promotion to Cpl for the month of January 1998 because of a pending DWI.

980129:  Applicant informed eligible but not recommended for promotion to Cpl for the month of February 1988 because of a pending DWI.

980331:  Applicant informed eligible but not recommended for promotion to Cpl due to a pending DWI IAW MCO P1400.32B, par 1204.3k for a period of 1 month, if applicable, unless waived by my Commanding Officer.

981119:  GCMCA [Commanding General, 1 st Marine Aircraft Wing] directed discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of conduct triable by courts-martial. Enclosure (3) materially supports the basis for separation. However, it has been removed per paragraph 6419 of reference (a).
Partial separation package missing from service record.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

 Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 981222 under other than honorable conditions in lieu of trial by court-martial (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).
Issues 1 and 2. The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment opportunities as requested in the issue. The Applicant did not submit sufficient documentation to overturn the presumption that his request for separation in lieu of trial by court-martial and admission of guilt to the offenses charged against him was proper and equitable. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
A. Paragraph 6419, SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective
18 Aug 95 until present.
B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

 E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                   Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                   Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00265

    Original file (MD00-00265.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    [Not recommended for promotion to Cpl for 1997Prom Qtr because of recent pg 11] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.971023: Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00530

    Original file (MD01-00530.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00530 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010314, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. My DD 214 was issued once and it states both characters of service for both of my enlistments. I never received a single DD214 for my Honorable discharge from my first enlistment.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01128

    Original file (MD03-01128.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01128 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030616. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record review.

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00639

    Original file (MD02-00639.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00639 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020404, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 030116. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 870402 under conditions other than honorable in lieu of trial by court-martial (A and B).

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00192

    Original file (MD00-00192.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00192 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 991117, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In the applicant’s issue 1, while the applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board, the Board found no evidence...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00200

    Original file (MD04-00200.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requested the service characterization received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. (For both Issues, please see my letter to Review Board)” ______________________________________________________________________ In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166 and SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue in supplement to this Applicant’s petition.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00357

    Original file (MD00-00357.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00357 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000121, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. 831017: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86:Specification: Unauthorized absence from 0400, 22Sep83 to 0400, 23Sep83 (1 day).Violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Specification: Violated BO P5000.2F by operating a M-51 dump truck without proper license on 1130, 27Jun83.Awarded correctional custody for 30 days, reduction to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00956

    Original file (MD02-00956.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00956 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020618, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 000322: Applicant informed eligible but not recommended for promotion to Cpl for the Apr-Jun promotion period due to lack of military appearance and needing to work on PFT run. At this time, the Applicant has not provided such documentation for the Board to...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00932

    Original file (MD99-00932.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-00932 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990629, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable conditions. I went to Lt.Col W_ and requested to get out of the Marines that I was not happy about the way my career was being changed for some one else. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01257

    Original file (MD99-01257.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD99-01257 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990930, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint.