Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500987
Original file (ND0500987.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-SA, USN
Docket No. ND05-00987

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050525. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

 Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20051006. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge and reason for discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct .


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“I believe now that my conduct in the Navy was wrong. Since my discharge from the Navy I have tried to improve myself. I am attending Teterboro School of Aeronautics with the hope of becoming an aircraft mechanic. I believe that I have become a more mature individual. I believe that my Navy record should be changed. ”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record and medical record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Job reference, dtd May 9, 2005
Job reference, dtd May 2, 2005
Letter of recommendation, dtd January 12, 2005
Letter of recommendation, dtd September 10, 2004

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     20001212 - 20010828      COG
          Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 20010829             Date of Discharge: 20040701

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 10 03
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence:    None
         Confinement:                       None

 Age at Entry: 18

 Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 46

 Highest Rate: ITSN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.0 (3)              Behavior: 2.0 (3)        OTA: 2 .78
Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): National Defense Service Medal


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/ PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600).
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

030128:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 121: Larceny.
         Award: Forfeiture of ½ pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-2. Forfeiture for 1 month suspended. No indication of appeal in the record. [Extracted from Commanding Officer’s letter dated 040609.]

030130:  NAVPERS 1070/613 warning : No further information found in service record. [Date extracted from Commanding Officer’s letter dated 040609.]

 040531:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 107: False official statement.
 Violation of UCMJ, Article 121: Larceny and wrongful appropriation.
         Award: Forfeiture of $718 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-2. No indication of appeal in the record.
040531:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of misconduct due to pattern of misconduct. Applicant notified that the least favorable characterization of service possible is under other than honorable conditions.
040531:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
040609:  Commanding Officer, USS HOWARD (DDG 83) recommended discharge with a under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to pattern of misconduct. Commanding Officer’s comments: “On 28 January 2003, SA M_ (Applicant) was found guilty at CO’s NJP of larceny for stealing over $900 from the rack of one of his shipmates. He was awarded 45 days restriction, 45 days extra duty, forfeiture of ½ months pay for 2 months (one month suspended) and reduced in rate to E-2. SA M_ (Applicant) was ordered to pay back the stolen money. On 31 May 2004, SA M_ (Applicant) was found guilty at CO’s NJP of larceny and giving a false official statement for stealing a digital camera from one of his shipmates while on watch than lying about it to the CMAA. He was awarded 45 days restriction, 45 days extra duty, forfeiture of ½ months pay for 2 months and reduced in rate to E-2. He has repeatedly demonstrated total disregard for the Navy Core Values as well as his shipmates. In my opinion, he has no potential for future Naval service; therefore, I recommend separation with a discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to pattern of misconduct.”

040615:  COMCARGRU SEVEN directed the Applicant's discharge with under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to pattern of misconduct.

Service Record contains a partial Administrative Discharge package.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20040701 by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (D).

 By regulation, a discharge shall be deemed proper, unless it is determined that an error of fact, law, procedure, or discretion has substantially prejudiced the rights of the Applicant. The Applicant was discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. A review of the Applicant’s service record reveals that a preponderance of evidence supports the finding that the Applicant committed misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. The Applicant was awarded nonjudicial punishment on 20030128 for a violation of UCMJ Article 121, larceny. Subsequently, the Applicant received a NAVPERS 1070/613 retention warning which was violated by nonjudicial punishment on 20030531 for violations of UCMJ Articles 121, larceny and wrongful appropriation, and 107, false official statement. The record further reveals that on 20040531 the Applicant was properly processed and notified for separation by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct with a least favorable characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions. On 20040531, the Applicant elected to not consult with qualified counsel and waive all of his procedural rights. On 2004609, the Commanding Officer, USS Howard, recommended to Commander, Carrier Group Seven, that the Applicant be discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of commission of a serious offense. On 20040615, Commander, Carrier Group Seven directed the Applicant’s discharge. Based upon the above review, the Board unanimously concluded that the Applicant’s discharge processing was in substantial compliance with applicable statutes, rules, and regulations. Despite the Applicant’s contentions, the Board could find no error of fact, law, procedure, or discretion that might afford the Applicant relief. Thus, the Board concluded that relief is not warranted.

Regulations require that a Sailor’s characterization of service be based upon the member’s total performance of duty and conduct during the current enlistment. When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has met the standard for acceptable conduct and performance, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when a member's conduct involves one or more acts or omissions that constitute a significant departure from the conduct expected of members of the Naval Service. T he Applicant’s service was marred by two nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of UCMJ Articles 107 and 121, and one NAVPERS 1070/613 retention warning. Based upon this misconduct, the Board concluded by unanimous vote that the Applicant’s service was equitably characterized as under other than honorable conditions and reflects his failure to meet the minimum standards required for an honorable discharge. The Board concluded that relief is not warranted.

There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded, based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that could be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board received and considered all of the Applicant’s submissions, including his letters of reference and letters of employment. After careful consideration, the Board concluded the Applicant’s post-service achievements have been insufficient to mitigate his misconduct while in the Naval service. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide any additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 2002 until Present, Article 1910-140 (formerly 3630600), SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501246

    Original file (ND0501246.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    My medical conditions were due to no fault of my own so I would request at this time that your office review all my military and medical records and correct my discharge to “ Honorable ” instead of “General Under Honorable Conditions.” I have attached a copy of my DD 214 for your review.Thank you for reviewing this request.Sincerely, Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (2)...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01116

    Original file (ND03-01116.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Thank you A_ T_ (Applicant)” No indication of appeal in the record.911219: LOS ALAMOS (AFDB-7) notified Applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as result of you being found guilty of the following charges at CO’s nonjudicial punishment: 911213, violation of UCMJ, Article 86:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100048

    Original file (ND1100048.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600231

    Original file (ND0600231.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. I went into the military for a change of life, venture, career help, and to send money home to my mother for watching my son. 000118: Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense.Service Record was missing elements of the Summary of Service.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500648

    Original file (ND0500648.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Issues submitted by Applicant’s counsel/representative (Civilian Counsel):“Whether the characterization of discharge was warranted given the circumstances of the offense charge and considering the entire service member’s exemplary record during the period of his enlistment. The Applicant’s violations of Articles 107, 108 and 121 are...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501071

    Original file (ND0501071.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND05-01071 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050614. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (2) Appointment of Veterans Service Organization as Claimant’s Representative, dtd June 7,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00055

    Original file (ND04-00055.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00055 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031006. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :020801: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 117 provoking speeches and gestures, violation of UCMJ, Article 128: Assault.Award: Forfeiture of $552.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600958

    Original file (ND0600958.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. No indication of appeal in the record.930116: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and/or misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.930116: Commanding Officer recommended discharge under...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01298

    Original file (MD03-01298.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Derelict in performance of duties by not delivering orders to TMO. Appeal voluntarily withdrawn on 920122.920110: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by three NJPs.920110: Applicant advised of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00090

    Original file (ND02-00090.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    With this discharge there in nothing I can do for them or myself. 010123: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to pattern of misconduct as evidenced by NJP held on 000725 and a foreign civil conviction of 001205 during current enlistment, misconduct due to commission of a serious offense as evidenced by NJP held on 000725 for violation of the UCMJ, Article 121, larceny of two debit check cards and wrongfully obtaining...