Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01298
Original file (MD03-01298.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Pvt, USMC
Docket No. MD03-01298

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030723. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040514. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Pattern of misconduct (administrative discharge board required but waived), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.3.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 No issues were submitted by the Applicant.

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Letter from Applicant

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: None
         Inactive: USMCR(J)                900823 - 901008  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 901009               Date of Discharge: 920325

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 05 17
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 36

 Highest Rank: PFC

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Proficiency: 3.6 (3)                       Conduct: 3.8 (3)

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 1

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Pattern of misconduct (administrative discharge board required but waived), authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6210.3.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

910730:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (3 specs):
 Specification 1: UA from 0731 – 1452, 910628.
Specification 2: UA from 0550 – 1110, 910723.
Specification 3: UA from 910709 to 910710.
Violation of UCMJ, Article 121: Used GSA Fleet Management Card to appropriate $8.03 of gasoline.
Awarded forfeiture of $334.00, restriction and extra duties for 45 days, reduction to Pvt. Not appealed.
910730:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Violations of UCMJ Articles 86 and 121.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
910910:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: UA from 0945 – 1400, 910817.
 Violation of UCMJ, Article 134 (4 specs):
Specification 1: Break restriction on 910817.
Specification 2: Dishonorable check for $50.00.
Specification 3: Dishonorable checks for a total of $100.00.
Specification 4: Dishonorable check for $100.00.
Violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Derelict in performance of duties by not delivering orders to TMO.
Awarded restriction and extra duties for 45 days (30 days suspended for 6 months). Not appealed.
910913:  Counseled for deficiencies in performance and conduct. [Violations of UCMJ Articles 86 and 134.] Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
920110:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 91 (3 specs):
 Specification 1: Disrespectful to SSgt M_ on 911219.
Specification 2: Disobeyed lawful order of SSgt M_.
Specification 3: Disobeyed lawful order of SSgt C_.
Violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Violate BaseO 5101.3P by having an unauthorized person operate his vehicle on base.
Violation of UCMJ, Article 111: DUI at 0059, 911130 with BAC of 0.179%.
Awarded forfeiture of $392.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duties for 45 days. Appealed. Appeal voluntarily withdrawn on 920122.
920110:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by three NJPs.
920110:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
920130:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

920221:  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.

920224:  GCMCA [CG, MCB, CAMPEN, CA] directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
920323:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 121: Took missing government B&G pager charging unit.
 Violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Violate BaseO 5000.2H by having unauthorized weapons in his BEQ room.
 Awarded forfeiture of $363.00 per month for 2 months. Not Appealed.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19920325 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

 The Applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. A characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions is warranted when the member's conduct constitutes a significant departure from that expected of a Marine. The Applicant’s service was marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on four occasions and adverse counseling entries on other occasions. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his disobedience of the orders and directives which regulate good order and discipline in the naval service. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.
The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.













Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6210, Misconduct , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, ( MCO P1900.16D), effective 27 Jun 89 until 17 Aug 95.

B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence; Article 91, disrespect to a SNCO; Article 92, disobey a lawful order; Article 111, drunk driving; Article 121, larceny; and Article 134, dishonorable debt.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-01001

    Original file (MD01-01001.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-01001 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010727, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. At the time of my problems in the Marines, I now consider myself to have been immature and have come to regret my actions. After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00510

    Original file (ND00-00510.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.910901: [USS MOUNT WHITNEY (LCC-20)] notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct an misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense [EXTRACTED FROM CO'S MESSAGE]. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 911220 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01125

    Original file (ND02-01125.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 (Member 1 and 4) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 990424 - 990527 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 990528 Date of Discharge: 011105 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 05 08 Inactive: None 011028: Applicant...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00015

    Original file (MD00-00015.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00015 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990930, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Charge III, violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Did on or about 851214, having been placed on duly imposed restriction, without authority, break said restrictions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01152

    Original file (MD03-01152.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: Inactive: USMCR(J) 970620 - 980614 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 980615 Date of Discharge: 010601 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 11 17 Inactive: None Chronological Listing of Significant Service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00898

    Original file (MD04-00898.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Marine Corps and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00331

    Original file (MD04-00331.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. 911010: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions.920117: SJA review determined the case sufficient in law...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00251

    Original file (ND01-00251.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.931123: [USS SPARTANBURG COUNTY (LST-1192)] notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a Pattern of misconduct as evidenced by all punishments under the UCMJ in your current enlistment.931123: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ, Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01185

    Original file (MD03-01185.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01185 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030627. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Ten pages from Applicant’s service record Character reference from N_ N_, ARNP Character reference from R_ J. S_, MEd, Ed S, CM Letter from Applicant PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00885

    Original file (MD00-00885.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00885 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000706, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Letter from J____ J. M______ Attorney at Law Copy of Service...