Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00462
Original file (ND04-00462.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-AOAR, USN
Docket No. ND04-00462

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20040121. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20041001. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct - Pattern of misconduct, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

 1. “I would like to have my discharge changed to a general discharge due to the fact that I would like to re-enter the military and I can not re-enter with the discharge and reentry code I was given when I was discharged.”

2. “The reason for my misconduct in the military was because my command told me that my rate had been closed. And that it would not reopen for approximately 3 years. Then I asked if I could cross rate they said that I would have to wait until enlistment was up. I did not think that it was worth doing my advancement books if I was unable to advance.

I apologize for my misconduct, I was young and did not know what my actions would cause at the time. I have grown up and realized that was the biggest mistake of my life. I have since then married and have two children and would like the chance to reenlist in the military. To have the chance to serve my country. I miss the military life and discipline that the military has to offer me and my family. This is why I am requesting a change in my discharge and reenlistment code to be given this opportunity to prove myself to my county.”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     900829 - 910715  COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 910716               Date of Discharge: 930722

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 00 07         Does not exclude lost time
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 33

 Highest Rate: AOAA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2.93 (3)    Behavior: 2.80 (3)                OTA: 2.80

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 1

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):
UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct - Pattern of misconduct, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

910717:  You are being retained in the Naval service, despite your defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry into naval service as evidenced by your failure to disclose your pre-service civil involvement /drug abuse. 6/91 Speeding violation, Howell, NJ (PD $99.00 fine). 6/91 Tinted windows, Freehold Borough, NJ (PD $31.00 fine). This decision is based on the information you provided the Recruit Quality Assurance Interviewer and if it is found that additional information has not been disclosed, this waiver is void and you could be subject to other judicial or administrative proceedings. However, any further deficiencies in performance or conduct may result in processing for administrative separation.

920702:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (4 specs): (1) Unauthorized absence from appointed place of duty on 0630-0730, 920612, (2) Unauthorized absence from appointed place of duty on 0630-0642, 920615, (3) Unauthorized absence from appointed place of duty on 0630-0700, 920622, (4) Unauthorized absence from appointed place of duty on 0630-1115, 920629.
         Award: Correctional custody for 30 days, forfeiture of $100 per month for 2 months. No indication of appeal in the record.
920703:  Retention Warning from USS CONSTELLATION (CV 64): Advised of deficiency (Unauthorized absence from appointed place of duty to wit: Workcenter on 0630-0730, 930612, 0630-0642, 920615, 0630-0700, 920622 and 0630-0730, 920629), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

 920916:  Retention Warning from USS CONSTELLATION (CV 64): Advised of deficiency (Wrongfully use reproachful words toward an E-2 onboard USS CONSTELLATION (CV 64)), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

 930219:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (3 specs): (1) Fail to go to appointed place of duty on 0500, 930106, to wit: Forward mess decks, (2) Unauthorized absence from 0700, 930110 to 1050, 930111 (1 day/surrendered), (3) Fail to go to appointed place of duty on 0700, 930219, to wit: Weapons Quarters, violation of UCMJ, Article 91: Disrespectful in language and deportment towards a PO3 on 930118.
         Award: Forfeiture of $250 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 30 days, reduction to E-1. No indication of appeal in the record.
930219:  Retention Warning from USS CONSTELLATION (CV 64): Advised of deficiency (Fail to go to appointed place of duty, to wit: Forward Mess Decks on 0500, 930106, unauthorized absence from 930110 until 930111; fail to go to appointed place of duty on 0700, 930219 and disrespectful in language towards a PO3 on 930118), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

930529:  Report chit: Two liberty cards.

930603:  Report chit: Failed to get 3-M qualified after given the required date of 930603.

930612:  Report chit: Late to morning muster by 20 minutes. Fourth offense and fourth counseling. All four were for lateness.

930624:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (2 specs): (1) Fail to go at the time prescribed to appointed place of duty on 930526, (2) Fail to go at the time prescribed to appointed place of duty on 930612; violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Fail to obey a lawful order to become 3-M qualified on 930603.
         Award: Forfeiture of $407 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 30 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
930702:  USS CONSTELLATION (CV 64) notified Applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of serious offenses as evidenced by your failure to obey a lawful order to become 3-M qualified on or about 930603 and disrespectful in language and deportment towards a PO3 on 930118 and misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct as evidenced by your three nonjudicial punishments each within the current enlistment, to wit: 930624, 930219, 920702.
930702:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
930709:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

930716:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19930722 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issues 1and 2. A characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions is warranted when the member's conduct constitutes a significant departure from that expected of a sailor. The Applicant’s service was marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on three occasions and adverse counseling entries on other occasions. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his disobedience of the orders and directives which regulate good order and discipline in the naval service. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.
Concerning a change in reenlistment code, the NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for waiver is normally done only during the processing of a formal application for enlistment through a recruiter.

The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an inequity or impropriety must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such inequity or impropriety occurred during the Applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle, are examples of verifiable documentation that may be provided to receive consideration for relief, based on post-service conduct. The Applicant’s evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate his misconduct sufficient to warrant an upgrade to his discharge. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.




Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C, Change 5, effective 05 Mar 93 until 21 Jul 94), Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00134

    Original file (ND00-00134.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :891026: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 107: False official statement on 16Oct89, violation of UCMJ Article 134: Obstructing justice on 16Oct96. No indication of appeal in the record.910508: USS CONSTELLATION (CV-64) notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense as evidenced by larceny of car audio equipment of a value of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00114

    Original file (MD01-00114.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00114 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001030, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. In the applicant’s issues 1 through 3, the Board found that although the applicant may have gotten a divorce, straightened out his financial problems and went back to school, this was not enough to upgrade his discharge to honorable. At this time, the applicant has not provided...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500502

    Original file (ND0500502.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge changed to general/under honorable conditions. Age at Entry: 19 Years Contracted: 4 Education Level: 12 AFQT: 39 Highest Rate: FN Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: 3.00 (1) Behavior: 3.00 (1) OTA: 3.00 Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SSDR, AFEM Days of Unauthorized Absence: 17 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00012

    Original file (ND01-00012.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    870427: Vacate suspended forfeiture and reduction awarded at CO's NJP of 4Feb87 due to continued misconduct.870427: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 0730, 7Apr87 to 0730, 11Apr87 (4 days/surrendered). No indication of appeal in the record.870621: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86 (3 specs):Specification 1: Unauthorized absence from appointed place of duty on 2100, 1Jun87. Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86 (4 specs): Specification 1:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00163

    Original file (ND01-00163.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00163 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001121, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Specification 2: Unauthorized absence 0730, 12Jul90 to 0730, 13Jul90 (1 day). Accordingly, I recommend administrative separation under other than honorable conditions.920106: BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00582

    Original file (ND03-00582.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00582 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030221. The Applicant requests the reason for the discharge be changed to “general but not honorable my offenses were not honorable.” The Applicant requests a personal appearance hearing discharge review before the Board in the Washington National Capital Region. In the acknowledgement letter to the Applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00414

    Original file (ND02-00414.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00414 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020221, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Award: Forfeiture of $416 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to SR. No indication of appeal in the record.940603: USS AMERICA (CV 66) notified Applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00613

    Original file (ND02-00613.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I found out that allot of recruits were offered A, C, & E schools among other things. told me they too wanted to strike out but the dept. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Letter from Applicant's mother to Captain, USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN (CVN-72) dated April 11, 1990 Letter to Applicant's mother from Commanding Officer, USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN (CVN-72) dated April 27, 1990 PART II - SUMMARY OF...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00185

    Original file (ND02-00185.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00185 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 011227, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. After my discharge we were divorced.2.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600573

    Original file (ND0600573.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Based on the available facts in this case, I separated SA S_ on 14 March 1997 from the Naval service with a General Discharge.” PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19970314 by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A and B) with a service characterization of general (under honorable...